similar to: Samba failing to start!

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 13:46:24 +0100 Artur Moor via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > If I remove 'nmbd bind explicit broadcast = no' in 'smb4.conf', then > nmbd wan't start and I get following in the log: > > [2016/12/16 12:37:35.075428, 0] > ../source3/lib/util_sock.c:396(open_socket_in) > bind failed on port 137 socket_addr = 10.0.140.255.

If I remove 'nmbd bind explicit broadcast = no' in 'smb4.conf', then nmbd wan't start and I get following in the log: [2016/12/16 12:37:35.075428, 0] ../source3/lib/util_sock.c:396(open_socket_in) bind failed on port 137 socket_addr = 10.0.140.255. Error = Can't assign requested address [2016/12/16 12:37:35.075626, 0] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_subnetdb.c:127(make_subnet)

OS = AIX 4.3.3 Samba 2.2.8a smb.conf: [global] workgroup = METRAN [test] comment = For testing only, please path = /usr/local/samba/tmp read only = no guest ok = yes smbd fails to start but did log a pid in smbd.pid. The process is not in the process table. I ran smbd -i to display the messages: smbd version 2.2.8a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team

Hi All... While trying to start the smbd i am getting the following error message. [2004/03/22 15:01:23, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(666) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error = Address already in use I checked in /etc/services... Nothing is using on port # 139 Please let me know if any one has seen similar kind of problem. Thanks

I did a complete installation of Red Hat 7.2 on my Dell Inspiron 5000 laptop from RH6.2. I had SAMBA running on it fine until I wiped my hard drive and installed RH 7.2. So now I have to learn how to set up SAMBA with xinetd. I saw a newer version of SAMBA on the SAMBA.org web site so I downloaded it. After reading the INSTAll file and following the instructions it created an RPM in:

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:36:33 +0100 Artur Moor via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > If I remove 'nmbd bind explicit broadcast = no' then 'smbd' can't > start because samba is running i jailed einvironment. You should still be able to start 'smbd', are any Samba deamons running when you try the join? Which Samba daemons are you starting ? >

Hello, I can't connect to my SAMBA server. Testparm not report error. I test the IP settings, I can Ping the server from any PC, I can Ping the PC from the SAMBA server, I can Ping Localhost or servername on the SAMBA server, But when I do a 'ps -ef' only the smbd is started. The 'log.nmb' report that : 'bind failed on port 137 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error =

I have been looking at samba for about 3 days and on Unix to provide shares for our NT system. My problem is that I can't seem to start the smbd process. There are some started but by the guest user and I'm sure I need one started by the root user. If I simply type the command it returns no errors to the screen, but there are errors in the log.smb file. The error is: - standard

Hi. We have had SAMBA running successfully at work here for a while, it's on a Sun Sparc Solaris 2.6. The version of samba is 2.0.0. Unfortunately our sysadmin has left the company, and I have to try and fix a problem with Samba. When I try and start samba, "nmbd" starts ok, but "smbd" doesn't start. When I check the log files, I get these errors: [2001/09/24

HI, I am running Red Hat 7.2 on a PC. Until today I have been able to start smb. Now I am no longer able to start smb. When I start it with /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start it say OK. However, when I execute /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb status it says that smbd is stopped, but nmbd is running. If I execute smbstatus it says "Failed to open byte range locking database, Can't initialize locking module -

SAMBA newbie here........New 2.2.8 install on 5.1 AIX, nmbd will not start. Here is my error: [2004/06/29 14:05:29, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(804) bind failed on port 137 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error = Address already in use Any ideas? Thanks !!! Larry S. Singleton lars@thornwood.com Systems Analyst E-Mail Administrator/Webmaster/"Guru in Training" Thornwood Furniture

I am install Samba on a New RS/6000 M 80. I am installing Samba 2.0.7. I have the services and inedt.conf files with the needed entries and have add a program check my entry. I get the following error in the log file and can not figure out what is wrong. [2001/01/17 12:31:59, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(863) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr=0.0.0.0 (Address already in use)

Hello! I have cross-compiled Samba 2.2.3a for my Dreambox(PPC DVB receiver with Linux). smbd runs without any problems but when I start nmbd I get the following error message: -------------------------------------------- standard input is not a socket, assuming -D option open_socket_in(): setsockopt: SO_REUSEADDR = True on port 137 failed with error = Protocol not available Failed to set socket

Mrs, I´m a Brazilian and i don´t speak english very well, but i need try , ok . I need your help. Well, i want install the samba 2.0.7 in HP-UX 10.20. The install process is not completely ok, but install. This is the message in the install process : _______________________________________ /var/tmp/AAAa23547/catalog/samba/samba-ROOT/configure[101]: Syntax error at line 129 :

I have upgraded samba to 2.2.7a and cannot print to my printer attached to my BSD machine. I can use the share dirs, etc, but cannot print. My log file contains: [2003/03/17 16:17:19, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(804) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error = Address already in use [2003/03/17 16:18:02, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(252) 50163099sp (204.250.145.147)

Mrs. I´m a Brazilian and i don´t speak english very well, but i need try , ok . I need your help. Well, i want install the samba 2.0.7 in HP-UX 10.20. The install process is not completely ok, but install. This is the message in the install process : _______________________________________ /var/tmp/AAAa23547/catalog/samba/samba-ROOT/configure[101]: Syntax error at line 129 :

Hi folks, We're seeing an odd thing happening on about 8 out of 100 UNIX machines running Samba 1.9.18p7. Mostly on HU-UX 10.20 systems, but at least once on an IRIX 6.4 system. The scenario: - SAMBA up and running in this environment for about 2 years sharing UNIX home directories with NT boxes. - SAMBA set up to start via inetd. - Had a plant shutdown over a weekend a month ago, all

Help please. I am in the process of configuring Samba 3.0.14a onto 4 AIX 5.3 systems. It seems to be working OK on 3 of the 4, but on the last one, I cannot start smbd. nmbd seems to start fine. The smb.conf file matches the other servers except that the server name is changed. Here's the error showing up on the log.smbd file. [2007/05/02 15:19:47, 0] smbd/server.c:main(835) standard

Rowland penny <rpenny <at> samba.org> writes: > Why are you using ntvfs ? > Also how are you starting the Samba deamons ? > > Rowland > Hi Rowland, Your mention of ntvfs is the first I've heard of it. A cursory search reveals it was implemented in alpha versions of Samba4, did I provision this domain incorrectly? Below are the commands I used when provisioning

Hello Everyone, I have installed samba-1.9.17p4 on a linux 2.0.29 box, but the server work correctly only as a client. Testparm runs ok, but when i try to list the shares available on my server, this is the output: Added interface ip = 195.32.68.131 bcast = 195.32.68.191 nmask = 255.255.255.192 Session request failed (0,0) with myname = DNS2 destname = DNS2 Unspecified error 0x0 Your server