similar to: Unwanted browse lists

Hi, I was wondering how a linux box configured as a firewall stacked up against some of the commercial products like checkpoint-1 and gauntlet. Can someone direct me to a good book or online doc that compares linux to some other firewall methods? Mind you, I''m not talking about a firewall in the classical sense, ie ip forwarding turned off and used as a proxy, but the typical Linux box

>From time to time someone will comment in this list that their Samba server has disappeared from the list of hosts in Network Neighborhood. Browsing the list archive has yet to turn up any good explanation of this phenomenon. I think I have a clue. This morning my server disappeared again. When I checked the process list on the server I noticed that nmbd had been swapped out to disk. The

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi everyone - Someone I''m working with has a requirement to map ethernet card addresses to unique IP addresses, and then have a Linux IP masquerade server know of this mapping list and not allow any data to pass from any ethernet card that a) it doesn''t know about, or b) isn''t assigned the right IP. Ideally it would also log this

Hi, Eric. You asked: > Does the full version of Front Page request locks? If so, maybe I need > to purchase it or another html editor that does. It doesn't use SMB file transactions at all. Instead it uses GET/PUT http commands to communicate with a remote server. Users are authenticated with a username/password combo and are connected to a "web," MS's word for a

Hi, i have a annoying problem that drives me crazy. We have set up a Digital/Unix box with samba and the clients (W95) can mount the shares from this box. On the Unix side we create a textfile which will be periodically (or not) appended with new data. A Application on the W95 side reads this file. The Problem is, that the textfile has new lines, the Application don't see them !!! To

I'm connecting to 1.9.18p8 on Linux 2.0.33 from an NT 4.0 workstation. I connect to the share with username phl and unencrypted passwords. In smb.conf, "force group=httpd" for the share called "sites." Smbstatus correctly reports: [root@www /sites]# smbstatus Samba version 1.9.18p8 Service uid gid pid machine

Samba digest 1966, Jeremy Allison wrote: > For people who are looking for some objective > numbers to help recommend Samba to their employers (I > know there are some of you on this list :-) you might > want to look at the following couple of articles. > > The first one is in Smart Reseller (a USA trade press > magazine) at : > >

Hello Everyone, I have installed samba-1.9.17p4 on a linux 2.0.29 box, but the server work correctly only as a client. Testparm runs ok, but when i try to list the shares available on my server, this is the output: Added interface ip = 195.32.68.131 bcast = 195.32.68.191 nmask = 255.255.255.192 Session request failed (0,0) with myname = DNS2 destname = DNS2 Unspecified error 0x0 Your server

Hi, There have been a bunch of useful submissions for the compare /contrast thread. To reduce the load on your mailbox, they are gathered here in one go... Roger. Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 15:11:37 +0000 From: "David L. Sifry" <dsifry@linuxcare.com> To: "Matthew S. Crocker" <matthew@crocker.com> CC: Rob Bringman <rob@trion.com>,

I just downloaded samba-1.9.18p3.tar.gz and compiled it on a DEC 3000/300 running OSF/1 v3.0 (uname -mrsv gives: "OSF1 V3.0 347 alpha") using the built-in cc compiler. The compiler gives the following warning: Compiling nmbd_incomingdgrams.c /usr/lib/cmplrs/cc/cfe: Warning: nmbd_incomingdgrams.c, line 452: Unknown character \ ignored ((DEBUGLEVEL>=(5))?(Debug1

> On Jun 4, 2015, at 5:52 PM, Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> wrote: > > Are you sure B is correctly configured to forward packets at the layer > 3 level between the interface of the "router" tinc and the interface > of the "switch" tinc? (iptables, etc.) > No, I am not sure about this and I think this is what I don?t understand properly

Hi, When php3 module is compiled in apache, files in any directory will be interpreted by the parser and executed. This is a security breach. There is a way to correct this? Any comments? Thanks, lacj --- <levy@null.net> Levy Carneiro Jr. Linux & Network Admin From mail@mail.redhat.com Sat May 8 02:32:02 1999 Received: (qmail 28372 invoked from network); 8 May 1999 07:05:57

Is there a way to prevent browselists from machines other than those of my choosing to show up in the browselists/network neighbourhood? I don't want win95 clients that offer shares themselves to show up in the network neighbourhood. Michel. -- Michel van der Laan - michel@nijenrode.nl http://www.nijenrode.nl/~michel

Hey Y'all, I just set up a new old machine on my network. I did a net install of CentOS 6.7 on it replacing an outdated copy of Win XP. Of course I'm now in the throws of configuring the machine to be a useful member of society. [mlapier at peach ~]$ nmap -sn 192.168.15.0/24 Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-08-23 20:12 EDT Nmap scan report for 192.168.15.1 Host is up

I was wondering if anyone here has or knows how to implement ttysnoop w/ssh ?

On Tue, 16 Jun 1998, Avery Pennarun wrote: > Here is the script I use on my home IP masquerade system. It is designed > to deny everything except what is specifically allowed in some of the > definitions near the top. Note that there is one fatal problem -- the > input firewall is changed to allow incoming data back to ports 1024 > through 65535, because any of those might have

Since it seems that named is theme of the month. I though I would present an example of using firewall to protect your bind service. One of reasons for presenting is that in all examples shown so far it seemed that everyone suggested to leave named full-open. However, it does not always have to be case. Say, if you are running an private network then you want just to allow named get data

I guess you are in what I think of as "Newbie Hell." It sounds like you are learning linux like a lot of people, all by yourself. That's how I did it, and it is maddening and worse, very time consuming. The important thing is not to keep hitting your head against the brick wall over and over. So, what to do. First, I would join a linux email support group. I belong to a very good

* I sent this to the guy doing the Securing RH 5.x online book, but this is not RedHat specific, should be good for all Linux'es (?). I haven't seen anything on here about this, so my apologies if maybe I missed it. >Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 08:37:27 -0400 >From: Alan Spicer <aspicer@ebiznet.com> >Organization: Electronic Business Network >X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en]

Hi, I had installed squid with ntlm authentication and content filtering from this tutorial: http://www.howtoforge.com/dansguardian-with-multi-group-filtering-and-squid-with-ntlm-auth-on-debian-etch. Next to last point is firewall configuration by ipmasq but I have installed shorewall. This is content of I89tproxy.rul file: #!/bin/sh # # redirect http requests to non-local hosts to the