similar to: Slowdown when copying large files

Check out these MSKB articles. They describe how shortcuts are resolved. In particular, the last one describes the process required to "fix" this behaviour. I had a LOT of trouble when I first set up my LAN because people had a nasty habit of sharing drive C (even I used to do this until I discovered that this is a Bad Idea). The main problem is that the shortcut includes the UNC

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is > officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to attacks > using ptrace. > > There is a mitigation described here > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384344#c13 > > which doesn't fix the

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se>: >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 >> Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: >> >>> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is >>> officially patched? As far

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is > officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to > attacks using ptrace. I can confirm that c6 is vulnerable, we're running a patched kernel (local build) using a rhel6 adaptation of the upstream fix. Ask

Hi ! I have a problem with samba that I cannot seem to solve: smbclient put it extremely slow. I am setting up a two-computer home network, with a '95 client (also print server), and a Linux 2.2.0-pre8 server, using samba-2.0. I've finished the setup, and most things work fine. However, I noticed that doing a 'put' with smbclient is extremely slow. I've read the

On 10/26/2016 05:56 AM, Peter Kjellstr?m wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:21:54 -0700 > Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Leon Fauster >> <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se>: >>>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200

Hello there, My name is Alireza. I am interested in utilizing R-program for measurement of earnings management (accounting related issue). However, there are two source programs which should be used simultaneously with the R-program to be able to measure earnings management. Previously (i.e. in year 2006) I could obtain these two source programs off the R-Project website (i.e.

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Sat, October 22, 2016 7:49 pm, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, this: >> >> https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-centos-7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/ >> >> At least those of us who still have important multi user

Hi all I am a complete newbie to this list (just subscribed) and a newcomer to R (an S user from olden times). I have been using scatter3d to create a 3d scatter plot with surface. The graphic is created within the rgl package and I have used rgl.postscript to export it so I can generate a publication quality image. My problem is that the plotted surface is no longer transparent in the

Hi everybody on this list, Could somebody please tell me how to expand the size limit of a vector in R? In my simulation I get the following error message: > x=kronecker(diag(1,100),matrix(1,100,100)) Error: cannot allocate vector of size 781250 Kb In addition: Warning message: Reached total allocation of 511Mb: see help(memory.size) Thanks in advance Yours sincerely, Guoqi Qian

Hi, I came across this page while browsing in the list archives: http://bioserve.biochem.latrobe.edu.au/samba/ The link on the page about adding machines and users had some interesting things in it that I thought I would try out. Specifically this link is: http://bioserve.biochem.latrobe.edu.au/samba/adding.html I wna to be able to log into the samba 2.0.7 'domain' from an NT

Hi,I came across this page while browsing in the listarchives: http://bioserve.biochem.latrobe.edu.au/samba/ The link on the page about adding machines and users had some interesting things in it that I thought I would try out. Specifically this link is: http://bioserve.biochem.latrobe.edu.au/samba/adding.html I want to be able to log into the samba 2.0.7 'domain' from an NT

I have not found any Samba documentation explaining using DNS for name resolution. We are running a name server on the network which was set up for several reasons. I find our DNS server is faster, more reliable and doesn't generate mangled machine names like our NT WINS server, which can't be edited. This doesn't happen with DNS since the names are all entered statically. We have

I'm running FreeBSD 3.0-current and have just upgraded samba to 2.0.0. Previously, I used unencrypted passwords. After upgrading, they didn't work so I changed to use encrypted ones. I can now map my drives from the PC. However, I still have a number of problems that I think are all related. - I can't use swat. The authentication always fails. I get a message on the console

Hi I have a problem accessing NT boxes which have a service (host) name which is purely numeric, smbclient insists on treating it as an ip number. For example:- /opt/samba/bin/smbclient \\\\06842\\BACKUP xxxxx -U xxxxx returns :- Connecting to 0.0.14.34 at port 139 Connection to 06842 failed I am using HPUX 10.2 and samba version 2.0.4b. Surely it should be possible to connect to NT

Hopefully this is a samba question, and not a Microsoft Access question... I have a multiuser access database on a samba share... it worked fine with multiple users being able to connect to it at the same time no probs. I just upgraded the linux box to red hat 6, copied across the same smb.conf from before and now users are getting a error "Too many active users" when more than one

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:29:33 -0400 "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> > wrote: > > > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is > > officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to > > attacks using ptrace. > >

Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se>: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 > Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > >> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is >> officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to >> attacks using ptrace. > > I can confirm that c6 is

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:21:54 -0700 Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Leon Fauster > <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > > Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se>: > >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 > >> Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > >>

Greetings All: I hope everyone had a fun Halloween weekend (I carved 4 big pumpkins and gave out a bucket full of rubber eyeballs and stuff). I'm hoping somebody can explain the password behavior I've been seeing (and a couple of other things). Here's my setup: An isolated LAN (most clients have modems for dialling out) with one linux/samba machine (RedHat 4.2, kernel 2.0.30,