similar to: No subject

Hi all, I've just installed the new version 1.9.18p7 on a Solaris 2.6 box. We have multiple domains in our organization with trust relationships (Domain authentication is handled by Windows NT servers). I would like to be able to have multiple servers listed as password servers. If the server authentication fails on the first server, it would try the next. With this, I could have many

Paul.Johnston@gwl.com wrote: > > I've just installed the new version 1.9.18p7 on a Solaris 2.6 box. We > have multiple domains in our organization with trust relationships > (Domain authentication is handled by Windows NT servers). I would like > to be able to have multiple servers listed as password servers. If the > server authentication fails on the first server, it

Ernie, Thanks for the great info.. Based on what you were seeing, would you suspect that part of the problem is with the combination of NT and the 3com card (3c595)? Currently, we are ONLY seeing this under NT Workstation (not server) and almost all of our machines have this same 3com 3c595 card (only if using 100BaseT).. -- Rick -----Original Message----- From: Ernie Oporto

In our users.map file we have the following entries: unix1 = nt1 unix2 = nt2 unix3 = @unixgroup3 unix4 = @unixgroup4 When we create shares on the samba server, we assign the valid users as @unixgroup3 or @unixgroup4. For whatever reason, if a share has @unixgroup4 as the valid users entry, we cannot connect to it from the nt side. If we flip-flop the group entries in the

Hallo out there, I've got a strange problem after updating my openssh-installation from 2.9.9p2 (SuSE-package) to openssh-3.1p1 (Installation from the source with a modified src.rpm). I will give you as much information as possible and I hope there is anybody who can help me. I asked in detail in usenet-groups but nobody had any idea to fix my problem by configuration. My system is a

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159 Summary: Password-Authentication with openssh-3.1p1 fails Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

Hi! Configuration: NT1 (NT Server 4.0 SP4) Unix2 (samba 2.0.3) Is this a normal behavior? My NT-Server and my samba-server a fighting to be the master browser. Look also at my smb.conf [global]-section. The OS-Level of my samba-server is much higher. /var/log/log.nmb: ***** [1999/10/06 14:01:07, 0]

I am getting the following level 5 logging for a Win95 PC under user-level sharing that is sharing to the user "backup" with "full-access". Can anyone help me get logged in via smbclient? shokk:/#> smbclient \\\\EOPORTO-DT\\DEPOT -U BACKUP doing parameter os level = 5 doing parameter domain controller = 137.202.xxx.xxx doing parameter wins proxy = yes doing parameter wins

At the bottom is what I got returned from AMANDA 2.3.0.5 after patching Samba 1.9.16p11 to give estimates. Any idea what I might not have done yet? My disklist reads: shokk \\thor\depot nocomp-user-gnutar To connect successfully to that server with smbclient, I have to do this, giving the same password that I now have in /etc/amandapass: smbclient \\\\THOR\\DEPOT -U BACKUP Also, the

Hi everyone, I have a configuration for a router that load-balances between two ISPs. What happens is that if a source-destination combination is looked up, one of the two gateways will be chosen, and further lookups will stay on that gateway until the chosen combination "stales" out. Web browsing works, ftp works, kazaa and other applications work. ssh on windows (using putty) works.

I've been messing around with running samba 3.4.14 inside a freebsd jail over the last couple of days, and am running into an odd problem where wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g succeed, but getent passwd fails (insofar that it shows only local users, but none of the domain users). Here's my smb.conf: [global] interfaces =192.168.0.16/32 bind interfaces only =yes security

Mick Cranston found an interesting and useful converse to my "add -browse to Solaris automounts" comment: He had mapped | a drive (for example g:) from my pc to \\sambasrv\net, then clicked on g: | in Explorer, Explorer would take 10-20 minutes to come back. Plus it was | eating my server alive because it was making all the NFS mounts possible | in /net. This is related to my

My whole problem as far as samba was concerned was not compiling with DES support *and* that I did compile with FAST_SHARE_MODES. One clue was this in the samba.log. file. I then did a dejanews search for smb_shm_open and came up with that portion of the solution. ERROR smb_shm_open : mmap failed with code 11 The DES portion came from just reading the WinNT.txt file that came with Samba. I

One thing that needs to be mentioned is that for PC backups, the amanda patch that has to be applied to samba requires that you use level 3 logging to see the "Total" line. Also, does anyone know what this error means? smb: \> recurse directory recursion is now on smb: \> dir received 5 entries (eos=1 resume=0) . D 0 Thu Jun 5

I hate to suggest this, but we need to do what has been done on a few other lists that I'm on. We need to close the list off to only people that are members. It's a shame to see so much spam here after seeing it in my personal mailbox all day long. At 11:21 PM 7/24/97 +0000, you wrote: >Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 11:14:25 +0200 (MET) >From: Konstantin Eftaxias <kef@eeb.de>

I'm getting the following in my logs when people try to connect to our Samba server. Any idea why this happens? The smb passwd file is there, and the user *does* exist. When I try to connect to the server, Win95 gets a message saying "You must supply a passowrd to make this conection. \\salamanda\IPC$". Security = server, the WinNT boxes have SP3 loaded, and this is Samba

smbstatus reports the following...that my NT users on this one samba server are connected as the guest user "nobody". All Win95 users are connected under their proper name. Anything I need to change? Samba version 1.9.16p11 Service uid gid pid machine ---------------------------------------------- gdl nobody nogroup 1555 gdl-dt (137.202.211.8) Wed

Can anyone tell me what the error is with recursion here? It is keeping my smbclient from giving AMANDA a sice for the share. Without recursion, and stepping through the directories manually, I can do the dir and get no errors. smb: \> ls received 8 entries (eos=1 resume=0) . D 0 Thu Aug 15 09:19:58 1996 .. D

Hi everyone, I would like to know if it's possible to start the smbd/nmbd daemons from an other HP Unix server. The installation of Samba has been made on a RAID mounted on an other Unix server (the main one). We want to do that because whe need to reduce the working flow in the main server. Thanks Daniel Comtois, Unix Tech. daniel.comtois@viasystems.com -------------- next part

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:43:07AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > ->mapping isn't even used by HMM users, and the field at the same offset > in the zone_device part of the union is declared as pad. (Which btw is > rather confusing, as DAX uses ->pgmap and ->mapping from two different > sides of the union, but DAX doesn't use hmm_devmem_free). > >