similar to: Browsing with 1.9.18p7 and WfW 3.11

Hi I use messages (net send...., smbclient -M ....) to let a server dial to my provider, or to let him fetch my mial. This worked until I switched to 1.9.18p3. My server is named FGP, my group FGP_GROUP. One of the nt-clients is named SAUSCHNELL - and one of the users on SAUSCHNELL is names fgp - like the server. Since I use 1.9.18p3 all the messages sent to FGP from a NT-computer are actually

Hi THis look like NT uses the dns-server to resolv netbios names (can be configured in the network properties). Try disabling that, and pray that nt, win95 und unix-servers find each other - if all the computers show up in all the network neighbor hood's , you won. Otherwise - well, contact microsoft - they invented wins, not-working-network-neighbor hood's and things like this...

Hi I think this should be possible. If the linux-server doesn't have to be a PDC, you can simply use samba with the parameter security = server password server = <real PDC> in your smb.conf If the linux-server has to be a PDC; you have to use the samba-NTDOM version. You can obtain it only via public CVS from samba.anu.edu.au. mfg, fgp -------------------------------------

Hi, Sorry if this is the documentation somewhere; however, I need a little tutorial help on howto configure a Wfw client for Samba: I have two samba servers, 1.9.18p2, on a couple of our Sun machines running Solaris 2.3. I know how to gain access from various Win95 machines in our group; however, I was requested to set up access for a Win3.11 machine today, and I'm kinda stumped. This

Hi, we're having quite a strange problem with our Linux samba (1.9.18p10) server: when doing a directory list from a Windows for Workgroups 3.11 Client all files an directories appear except <.> and <..>. While this is not a serious problem when using ?dir?, some applications (e.g. Ami Pro 3.1) seem to rely on these entries. In the file dialogues this particular application does

My server is RH 5.2 and i use Samba 1.9.18p10 and the client use WFW 3.11 with tcp/ip protocols installed. The subnet and the IP Address is right but I still only telnet form WFW 3.11 to Linux...not the reverse. On Linux telnet is working. I've checked it through this cmdline "telnet localhost 23 or telnet 127.0.0.1" . And I also testparm smb.conf and nothing wrong happen. FYI I set

Hi. I wanted to set diskless win95 but I read the list archives and I decided not to do it diskless. So I tried diskless windows but I got a problem. I do this. 1.- I did booting images with bootware proms. 2.- I managed to install DOS clients from microsoft. That was painfull because the one I downloaded from MS didn't connected to my samba server. I used a dos clients that creates a NT

I have installed samba for the first time and I try to start it in a windows 95 environement. I started nmbd and smbd with the config file listed at the end of this mail (I remove all comment for clarity) I expect to use samba with the SHARE protocol of Windows 95 (No WINS) The new server (sdmpcsv02) is recognised by the other pc's but the can list the exported files The smbclient -L

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: Buffer overflow in mars_nwe Advisory ID: RHSA-1999:037-01 Issue date: 1999-09-13 Updated on: Keywords: mars_nwe buffer Cross references: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Topic: There are several buffer overruns in the mars_nwe

Hi there, we've got the following problem, while Windows-Clients works with samba and a DOS-Client connects over Mars_NWE to the same Linux-Server: When the DOS-Client opens a file on the linux-server and the WinClient opens the same file, and when both clients want to write the same file, the windows-client gets an error and crashes. We tried it only with the windows-clients and there

Specifying Browser Computers When you start a computer running Windows 2000, the browser service looks in the registry for the entry MaintainServerList to determine whether a computer will become a browser. MaintainServerList is found in the following registry subkey: \HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Browser\Parameters Table I.1 shows the values to which MaintainServerList

Dear All, we have shared a directory which includes several subdirectories from a Unix server. Browsing the subdirectories on an Windows 3.11 Client leads to an unestimated result. All files in the second subdirectory-level are invisible. The files in the first subdirectory-level could be accessed normally. This is only a problem on WfW Clients, browsing the directories on a NT host leads to no

Hi. I followed the advises from yours but I still can't do tcp/ip from wfw when booting diskless. I was told to run the wsahdapp.exe file, but when I do it windows tells me : winsock api Instalation Error The DOS sockets TSR is not loaded and of course when I try to run netscape it tells me: Netscape was unable to create a network socket connection There may be insufficient system

Please, remove my registration from your mailing-list. For weeks I tried everything I could, but without any response!! I followed all hints found under http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc Sincerely Bernhard Himmel himmel@warnow.e-technik1.uni-rostock.de himmel@saphir.physik1.uni-rostock.de himmel@physik1.uni-rostock.de > Reply-to: samba@samba.org > From:

When I do this in Windows XP : HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSetXXX\Services\Browser\Parameters\MaintainServerList " isdomaine master = false maintainserverlist = no nbtstat -a 192.168.2.135 give these informations : MO99 <0x00> Unique Workstation Service BOM <0x00> Group Domain Name MO99

Hello, I need to serve one fileshare to different users in different groups ( I do so ). I gave different users different groups and told samba to make new files owned by user:group, mod 775. But now some users have the need to write in the directory of another group. Is it possible to force user and group per directory and not per share, or is it possible to create links in the filestructure

Headway Research is closed for the Christmas and New Year holidays. Normal work will be resumed Monday January 4, 1999. Your email will receive the appropriate attention upon our return. We wish you a safe and happy holiday season!! *************************************************************************** Headway Research, Inc. |Telephone: 972-272-5431 3713 Forest Lane

One of our group companies has just 'gone live' on a new laboratory management package. Although the software is M$-based (ie: expects a M$ server at the heart of it), it is running with its core database on a CentOS3 server using Samba for client access - in fact, the developers are amazed at the performance and say it beats a Win2K/2K3 server 'hands down'!!! Anyway, the old lab

samba@samba.org schrieb: > SAMBA Digest 1926 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Three problems with Windows NT > by terminus@backinthe.ussr.net (Jeremy Malcolm) > 2) Re: Encrypted passwords and OS2/Win95/Win98 > by Benjamin Scott

I've now tried 2.0.6pre2 with a SuperMicro P6DNF dual PPro as well as the Everex StepDP/Pro dual PPro MB; same result, large (more than 1 MB) file copies usually crash with only a message about oplock errors in the logfile. Running a single CPU kernel works fine (pre2 seems much faster, but I haven't done any testing). 2.0.5a does the same. NFS and mars_nwe with the same hardware and