similar to: SAMBA digest 1706 (PR#7484)

> > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 17:28:41 +0000 > From: Jeff Wiegley <jeff@la.usweb.com> > To: samba@samba.anu.edu.au > Subject: ARGH!! why does my samba server lose domain master elections?? > Message-ID: <35743649.5CF3502F@la.usweb.com> > > Subject pretty much says it all. > > (And *please* don't point me

estewart@dudley.lib.usf.edu wrote: > > On an Ultra 1 running Solaris 2.6 and using gcc 2.8.1 > > ipc.c: In function `api_RNetServerEnum': > ipc.c:1194: warning: passing arg 4 of `qsort' from incompatible pointer > type > > Compiling nmbd_incomingrequests.c > nmbd_incomingrequests.c: In function `process_node_status_request': >

TO THE SAMBA TEAM: MAY YOUR TRIBE BE HERE FOREVER! YOU' SIMPLY GREAT BUT i CAN'T AFFORD TO BUY YOU A PIZZA BUT OUR NATIVE PIE "BUKO (YOUNG COCONUT) PIE" IS BETTER! i HAVE BEEN USING SAMBA 1.9.16P9 AND STILL ALRIGHT. PERHAPS I'LL DO CHANGE TO SAMBA 2.0 AND THIS IS A LONG WAY! i DID TRIED SAMBA SINCE MY OFFICE CAN'T AFFORD TO BUY NFS TO SERVE AT LEAST 20 PCs AND

Hi all, Inforworld (that's a rather large computer magazine is the USA) are thinking of doing an article on people using Samba to replace/supplement NT servers in commercial organizations within the USA. I told their editor I'd send out this request for people who fit the following criteria to send in their details : They need people who are : (a). USA Based. (b). Using Samba but

hi guys We use rsync extensively in keeping the site resources in synch across redundant infrastructure. While attempting rsync for one of the boxes we find that the rsync process simply sleeps. The situation remains the same even if we have sync very small contents of the order of 4 KB. The same run with the -an flag runs without any issues. We run rsync over ssh on solaris boxes. To debug the

Here is patch 1 of 2. Roger diff -rup nut-2.7.4.orig/clients/upsmon.c nut-2.7.4.dev/clients/upsmon.c --- nut-2.7.4.orig/clients/upsmon.c 2015-12-29 13:08:34.000000000 +0100 +++ nut-2.7.4.dev/clients/upsmon.c 2016-07-01 09:46:21.567766415 +0200 @@ -525,6 +525,18 @@ static int get_var(utype_t *ups, const c numq = 2; } + /* Subcommands for polling SIGUSR1, SIGUSR2 RP */ + if (strcmp(var,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4327 Summary: Sudden rsync errors Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: All URL: http://www.ercbroadband.org OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

Hello everybody. I've been trying for weeks to find a solution for my problem, but since I couldn't find anything, here I am. I manage a network of about 200 PCs, 90% windows XP and Vista, 10% linux. A samba server is located on the main server, acting as a WINS server, to manage the list of connected computers. However, when a resident computer is badly configured (ie no wins server

Here is patch 2 of 2. Roger diff -rup -x '*.html' -x '*.8' -x '*.5' nut-2.7.4.orig/docs/man/upsd.txt nut-2.7.4.dev/docs/man/upsd.txt --- nut-2.7.4.orig/docs/man/upsd.txt 2015-12-29 09:42:34.000000000 +0100 +++ nut-2.7.4.dev/docs/man/upsd.txt 2016-07-07 10:08:51.939354892 +0200 @@ -119,6 +119,16 @@ administrative functions like SET and IN controlled in

It is necessary to kick the state machine any time another thread blocks due to write() encountering a full buffer, to get the reader thread to learn that it must now poll on POLLOUT rather than just POLLIN. POSIX only provides two ways to do this: either poll() on a second fd (our pipe-to-self trick), or interrupt the polling with EINTR due to delivery of a signal. So, I played with the latter

Hi, I have a problem with rsyncing large data sets (consisting bunch of small files) over ssh. rsync 2.6.6 on both sides. Linux 2.6.10 on receiving side, 2.6.12.6 on sending side. This strace is from rsyncing over 2Mbit link but I can repeat it over 100Mbps lan, too (while testing on lan 2.6.11.3 was on sending and 2.6.12.6 on receiving side). I wonder what can be problem here? Some

Pishotta.Fred@Mayo.Edu wrote: > > Yes, I got those too, on an identical platform, but with p6. Things seem > to work, but it would be comforting to know if this is a non-issue. > > -- Fred P. > > On Wed, 13 May 1998, SI-Gaetan Boudreau wrote: > > > I get these messages when compiling on a Sun Sparc 5 running Solaris 2.6: > > > > Compiling ipc.c >

I got mcp mag a day or two ago, Great writeup!! I was a little surprised that they ran such a glowing review of samba, with some of the negative implications on NT. It is very nice to see Microsoft show an interest in interoperability. -Steve Roylance > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeremy Allison [SMTP:jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 1999 6:41 PM >

First off: Our clusters are LVS balanced Apache 2.2.3 + mod_proxy_balancer + gem mongrel 0.3.13.3 / mongrel_cluster 0.2 + memcached / gem memcache_client + gem rails 1.1.6 on debian boxen, and a pgcluster backend. On 2 of our deployed clusters, we are getting the "spinning mongrel" problem. As the clusters are very low volume right now, it takes days to collect a spinner, making it

I've exactly the same problem. My config looks similar to yours: 1 samba as wins server (wins support=yes" on one segment, 1 samba as "wins server client" (wins server = xxx). The "wins server client" never discards machines from segment 1. I looked at the browse.dat and the wins.dat on the server on segment 1. There are no entries of the shutdowned maschines. Only in

I can. I've removed every other compilation flags from clang and even used GCC, with the exact same behaviour. cheers, --renato On 29 July 2014 15:15, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote: > OK, we can switch to SIGHUP. Could you please verify that this SIGUSR1 > behavior is not caused by MSan? > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Renato Golin

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5695 Summary: rsync local timeout Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: gabriele.tozzi@gmail.com QAContact:

Hi. I have a Windows machine (XP/SP2) which i want backup to a Linux machine (named "Pippi") using rsync. I have cwRsyncServer running on the Windows machine (10.10.10.90). When i start rsync from the Linux machine after a while rsync stops - as far as i understand it because of a network timeout. > io timeout after 60 seconds -- exiting > rsync error: timeout in data

Hi Rsync Support, Recently we encountered issue on our prod environment because the rsync seems hanging, it took time building the list.Previously the rsync process was working before 10:24am not until 10:25am. See sample log below. We have one source server and the data files will be rsync to 2 webservers. Please advise what could be the cause of the issue. Please let me know if you need

Hi Arnaud, On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Arnaud Quette wrote: > The technique is very general and is to send SIGUSR1/SIGUSR2 to the upsd daemon.? SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 are events just like ONBATT and ONLINE. > The patch runs successfully on my opensuse 13.2 box, and solves my problem. In upssched.conf I now have declarations such as > > ? ?AT SIGUSR1 * CANCEL-TIMER