similar to: Using a secondary WINS server with Samba

I've got a Solaris 2.6 SPARC system running Samba 2.0.6 and an NT-4.0sp5 PDC system. If Samba is running on the Sun system when the NT PDC is rebooted it (the NT system) complains that there is already another PDC in the domain. This should not be as far as I can see as I've tried specifically to configure the Samba systems not to do this and in fact prior to upgrading to Samba version

Well, I screwed around a bit and after doing a "wbinfo -u" and a "wbinfo -g" I stopped getting the "unable to map SID" error. Now I'm getting a different error. ;-D [2004/05/25 09:09:34, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(FC2-i386-disc1.iso) returning 0744 [2004/05/25 09:09:34, 3] smbd/posix_acls.c:convert_canon_ace_to_posix_perms(2500)

Does anyone know of an ACL/extended attributes enabled version of the Red Hat 9 kernel exist in RPM form? -- Michael St. Laurent Hartwell Corporation

I'm seeing random disk full errors when saving large Excel files to a Samba share. The users will retry and the second or third time (usually the second time) it will save correctly. This is with version 3.0.21a on i386 Red Hat 9, kernel 2.4.20-31 patched with ACL. -- Michael St. Laurent Hartwell Corporation "This is the captain speaking. We may experience some turbulence... and

Is there a yum repository which contains the package gtkterm for CentOS-5? -- Michael St. Laurent IT Department Hartwell Corporation -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Samba version 3.0.10 seems to be ignoring the map file on my system. I have the line: root = administrator in the file but when the administrator account tries to access the system the add user script is run for the user "administrator". -- Michael St. Laurent Hartwell Corporation

Is there a simple fix for the illegal input sequence errors I'm seeing with the smb.conf man page? This is on a Redhat 9 system. Do I need to update the groff package or some such? -- Michael St. Laurent Hartwell Corporation

A recent post suggested using the Fedora packaging to get the separate RPMs to build for Redhat. I gave that a try but am getting the following error when doing so on a Redhat 9 system: make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.0.21b/source' rm -f /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.0.21b/source/include/includes.h.gch gcc -I. -I/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.0.21b/source -O2 -g

What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the latest updates support it? -- This e-mail may contain technical information which is controlled by the United States Government, Department of State, International Traffic & Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR 120-130) which requires an export license prior to sharing with foreign persons. Lacking such license, ITAR technical

rowl@earthlink.net wrote: > > We are experiencing the same behaviour with Autocad R14 at Hartwell > Corporation. The Engineering Department reported it to me just yesterday. > We too are using samba version 1.9.18p8 on a SPARC architecture Solaris > 2.5.1 system. > > At 07:21 PM 6/16/98 +1000, Jem Atahan wrote: > >Hi all. > > > >We have here a Sun sparc 5

I found part of the problem... the Red Hat 9 kernel does not ship with the ACL patches installed. ;-) Does anyone know if there is a repository that hosts Red Hat kernel RPMs with the ACL patches applied? Michael St. Laurent <> wrote: > I have a newly upgraded Red Hat 9 Samba server (now ver. 3.04, > formerly ver. 2.2.7a) on which I would like to start using ACLs to > provide the

Hi all, I'm having trouble getting ntlm_auth working with the "--require-membership-of=" option. I did rebuild the Samba RPM so that it had the --enable-auth="ntlm,basic" and --enable-external-acl-helpers="wbinfo_group" settings. The command line test for the squid-2.5-basic protocol returns an "OK". The one using the squid-2.5-ntlmssp protocol

I've just installed an HP Jet Direct Network Print Server and configured our SCO 5.0.2 box to print to it. I can send anything to it as long it's from the Unix side. Then I configured Samba to share the printer and tried sending a test page from one of the NT workstations but nothing came out and I could find no error messages in the log files (even at debug level 9)! The log file just

I've got ACLs enabled in the kernel now and I can add and/or remove them using the unix command line program (setfacl/getfacl). However, there still seems to be a problem. When I try to add an ACL type permission to a file (through Samba) I get the following in the log file: [2004/05/24 18:14:57, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(1381) create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID

Is there a problem with "username map" in version 3.0.9? It seems to be ignoring the map file on my system. I have the line: root = administrator in the file but when the administrator account tries to access the system the add user script is run for the user "administrator". -- Michael St. Laurent Hartwell Corporation

Ben Bolstad experienced something odd while running R CMD check over a package of ours using r-devel (yesterday's fresh). He tracked down the problem to a vignette calling 'library(MASS)'. Please kindly ignore if this is a known (and temporary) issue. Laurent ----- Forwarded message from Ben Bolstad <bolstad@stat.berkeley.edu> ----- Return-Path:

Hi, I tried to use the 'make' file discussed in the last R-news. The step 'make R' dies with: make[2]: Entering directory `/home/laurent/these/R/RCrossBuild/WinR/R-1.7.1/src/gnuwin32' sed -e s/@RVER@/`cut -d' ' -f1 ../../VERSION | sed -n 1p`/g -e s/@RWVER@/rw1071/g rw-FAQ.texi | \ makeinfo --no-headers --number-sections -o rw-FAQ makeinfo --no-split --html

I am running Red Hat 7.2 and using smbmount to mount a PC share from a NT4 SP5 Workstation. I have a folder, in this share, of around 300 files and when I do ls -l I get inconsistencies. Sometimes files are missing, and if I keep repeating the command the files are then appear again. Other times the size information is wrong. No one else is using, or changing, any of the files on the source

Hi Sam, On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 09:08:13PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 04:18:52PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Am 06.03.20 um 15:22 schrieb Laurent Pinchart: > > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 04:59:28PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > >> A call to drm_simple_encoder_init() initializes an encoder without > > >> further

Hi Laurent Am 06.03.20 um 15:22 schrieb Laurent Pinchart: > Hi Thomas, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 04:59:28PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> A call to drm_simple_encoder_init() initializes an encoder without >> further functionality. It only provides the destroy callback to >> cleanup the encoder's state. Only few drivers