similar to: rsync: stat "/path/to/dest/file" failed: No such file or directory (2)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3693 Summary: rsync can use same --link-dest file several times, leading to incorrect hard links Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

[please Cc: 666024-forwarded at bugs.debian.org on any replies, thanks] Please see the attached Debian bug report, which includes a helpful bug-reproducing shell script; I've confirmed this still happens with 3.0.9. Paul Slootman On Tue 27 Mar 2012, Ian Jackson wrote: > Package: rsync > Version: 3.0.7-2 > > With rsync --link-dest, if two different source files (not hardlinked

Hi, I am using --link-dest for my rotating backups. Noticing the "--detect-renamed-lax" patch to rsync 3.0.0. I was hoping to make use of the --detect-moved. Unfortunately, "--detect-moved" does not seem to recognize the --linkdest option. A moved file is getting transferred again and a new file is created at the receiving end instead of linking to the moved

Hourly I have an rsync job backup /home to /home/backup. I have 24 directories (one for each hour): home.0 ... home.23 Here is the script I am running via cron: #! /usr/local/bin/bash dest=`date +%k | sed 's/ //g'` linkdir=`date -v-1H +%k | sed 's/ //g'` chflags -R noschg /home/backup rm -rf /home/backup/home.$dest rsync -ahHP --numeric-ids --delete --stats --link-dest=../

I use rsync to backup several servers to harddisk on a backupserver. To save space i use the --link-dest option which creates a hardlink to the file of the last backup if the file hasn?t changed. If a file already exists in the destination directory then an maybe existing file in the --link-dest directory is ignored. The existing file will be overwritten with the new version regardless whether

>> >> I highly recommend the following site: I intentionally deleted the dangerous link that was previously posted here. >Sure. >And take the next time more time to explain why you recommend it. >Mostly because to get beyond a moderator of this mailinglist. > >In other words: >Stappers considered the blut URL dropping as spam. >He flagged the posting E-mail

Hello ladies & gentlemen, Which combination of options/output redirection permits to display the progress (--progress) at the standard output and ONLY (no file listing) the stats (--stats) in a log file? If the stats are also displayed at the standard output, it's ok Thank you. ps: rsync 3.0.2 -- View this message in context:

I have the following script that I am working on #!/bin/bash date=$(date +%F--%T) #ssh parameters user=aquj001 remotehost=qa4app localdir=/home/aquj001/INFENG/scripts remotedir=/home/aquj001/recievingDir.$date linkdest=$(ssh $user@$remotehost /usr/linux/bin/readlink/ /home/aquj001/recievingDir.current) rsync -a --compress --link-dest=$linkdest --out-format='%i %n%L %l %M'

Hello, I'm trying the latest rsync(3.0.0prev7) on Mac OS 10.5.1 and getting the following error: rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 887 bytes [sender]: Broken pipe (32) recv_xattr_request: internal abbrev error! rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (26242 bytes received so far) [sender] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(600) [sender=3.0.0pre7] Can

Hi Larry, Your tech details are way beyond my knowledge, but maybe python can do the job for you too? I use this python script (from the python cookbook) and crontab to keep my sheep in the dry: #!/usr/bin/env python #wraps up rsync to synchronize two directories # ! -- should contain check of disk space using rsync -n option for drytest ! from subprocess import call import sys import time

Hi, I just noticed that the value of the '--compare-dest' argument is simply prepended to the DEST argument, even if that has path compnents. For example with this command: rsync -a --compare-dest=$comparedest \ remote::something/1/ \ /local/path/to/1/ if the remote 'something' module has a file called '1/2/3/4/file' (which is going to be mirrored to

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3198 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-10-20 09:45

Hi all I have dovecot-lda set up to run as vmail:vmail, with some sieve scripts in /var/lib/dovecot/sieve. The sieve scripts fail to be found with the following (detailed and very helpful) error message: Oct 14 16:13:33 gatekeeper dovecot[8109]: lda(minfrin at example.com)<8109><ZJ9nMo0Hh1+tHwAAKdTwig>: Error: sieve: file storage: Failed to stat sieve storage path:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11866 Bug ID: 11866 Summary: rsync fails (failed to re-stat) when using double fuzzy + link-dest on renamed files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167 Summary: --dry-run --stats --link-dest provides incorrect stats Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: michele.giacomoli

Hi, everyone I'm building the newest libvirt from git repository, of version 782afa98e4a5fa9a0927a9e32f9cf36082a2e8e7 and failed complaining as the following. make[3]: Entering directory `/home/harvey/open-projects/libvirt-build/po' cd ../../libvirt/po && : --update af.po libvirt.pot cd ../../libvirt/po && rm -f af.gmo && : -c --statistics -o af.gmo af.po mv:

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

On 13 Dec 2017, at 9.55, Mar?a Arrea <maria.arrea at gmx.com> wrote: > > > We have upgraded today from Dovecot 2.2.31 to Dovecot 2.2.33.2 and modified our config to include ITERINDEX in mail_location and we are detecting some errors like this: > > > /Dec 13 08:17:31 buzon_rhel7 dovecot: imap(rboloix): Error: stat(/buzones/location/18/48/rboloix/mailboxes/SIT -

Hi: I have an application where there is a single file-server and approximately 500 clients that are writing a continuous stream of moderate-sized data files. We have been using samba for this, but the problem is each smbd process on the server side ends up chewing up 50-60 megs worth of memory after a while. With 500 clients that takes a good chunk of the memory away :-) I am exploring

Hi! I use dovecot 1 without any problems for years. Thanks for it! Now I try to migrate to dovecot2. I have small problem. # dovecot --version 2.0.7 # dovecot -n # 2.0.7: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE i386 auth_verbose = yes disable_plaintext_auth = no first_valid_gid = 26 first_valid_uid = 26 lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes login_greeting = imap/pop mailserver