similar to: Trivial exclude help

We are having issues with drpms on CentOS-6 i386 and x86_64 and on CentOS-7 x86_64. The technical issues sometimes cause us to have to rebuild all drpms over again .. and the time involved is very large.? Also storing the drpms and moving them around takes up a lot of space and bandwidth. We would like to remove delta rpms (drpms) from our CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 repositories. But before we do ,

Looking at the nice new 6.4 tree (thanks!!!) I see there are already a few updates. eg Packages/firefox-17.0.3-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm Packages/firefox-17.0.3-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm So far, so normal. These occur because of timing. That's not a problem; it's expected. What confuses me, though, is the drpms directory where there are 33 firefox drpm files compared to the 2 Packages,

On 3/23/19 9:19 AM, Bez Thomas wrote: >> On Mar 22, 2019, at 9:52 PM, Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: >> >> Was just doing a (very) belated update on a 7.5 system and ran into >> this set of errors: >> > >> Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying.. >> > > >> >> so, anybody know why

Hi list, Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed from a 5.0 DVD I think). The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm -- checksig' test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large portion of them are corrupted and fail the GPG check. This seems to be isolated to yum, as downloading the RPM directly via FTP with wget or lftpget

Has anybody successfully implemented DRPMs on centos 5.x? I searched the net and I found a few indications that it is possible, but there is very little info how to do it. Just to be clear. With DRPMs i mean deltaRPMs. And with implementation i mean What yum plugins are necessary and what has to be done on the yum repository to make it work. BR Janez -------------- next part -------------- An

Hi all, New to the list and (mostly) new to CentOS. We have just moved from running RHEL to CentOS on our main production servers. Anyway, I am configuring a couple of new SunFire v20z servers here at the moment and trying to get the systems' management interfaces to work fully under CentOS. First issue was trying to install the openipmi RPM from the CD that came with the SunFires, this RPM

Hi list, The bug reporting guide in the wiki mentions we should notify the - devel list when reporting a new bug, so I just wanted to bring some attention to: http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1328 I''d reported another bug myself (http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1332 ) and marked it as a duplicate of the one above as they seem to be the

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > I'm not sure if I understand the semantics of HI16 and LO16 relocations. If > my understanding is correct, a pair of HI16 and LO16 represents an addend > AHL. AHL is computed by (AHI<<16) | (ALO&0xFFFF). Can't we apply HI16 and > LO16 relocations separately and produce the same relocation

Dear all, I coded a function called u.glm u.glm <- function (x,ahi,age,bmiz,gender) { library(nortest) lil.rslt <- lillie.test(x) if (lil.rslt$p.value >0.05) { cat("Logtrans=0, lillie=",lil.rslt$p.value,"\n") xmodel<-glm(x~ahi+age+bmiz+as.factor(gender)) summary(xmodel) confint(xmodel) } else { cat("Logtrans=1,

Hi, I use asterisk with sip3000 device with "sip-aho" connected to PSTN and "sip-ahi" connected to a phone. When call arrives from PSTN, the *phone continues ringing even after caller hanged up*. The dialplan contains the following lines: [from-pstn] ... exten => 99,n,Dial(SIP/sip-ahi,30,g) exten => 99,n,Hangup() The asterisk properly detects hangup of the caller as I

Tom Lanyon <tom at netspot.com.au> wrote: > On 06/12/2007, at 8:20 AM, James A. Peltier wrote: >> > Tom Lanyon wrote: >> >>> >> Hi all, >>> >> Trying to install 5.0 or 5.1 (i386 or x86_64) on a new system from >>> >> an install DVD. As soon as the installer launches anaconda, the >>> >> screen shuts off

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Simon Atanasyan <simon at atanasyan.com> > wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Simon Atanasyan <simon at atanasyan.com> >> > wrote: >>

aglia aglia (in italian meat ahi ahi !) Hello i have a serius questions . I have installe din my school samba as PDC for 8 subnet with client win98 Me 95 and i use it like profile server . Last month the school without call me buyed 10 cp with xp home ! It never possible that xp home do not support domain logons, and other nice features . I have samba 2.2.7a with mandrake 9.0 Thank for help me

I have run a local repo for Centos updates for some time. I suppose, at this point I could just delete the 5.3 update directory and rsync the 5.4 directory... But how large is the 5.4 update directory? Oh, just for i386, without /debug and is there anything else I should not include? For example for my FC11 update repo I also exclude drpms.

On 3/25/19 8:32 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > This is not the first time we have had issues with drpms in the update tree. > Would anyone be opposed to taking away deltarpms from the repositories? > > They take up lots of space and they have cause multiple issues in the past. > > Thoughts? Due to the disk churn deltarpms need and our own internal mirroring of centos packages, one

Hi, I am working on support R_MIPS_HI16 / R_MIPS_LO16 in the new LLD and have a couple of questions. == Q1 In case of MIPS O32 ABI we have to find a matching R_MIPS_LO16 relocation to calculate R_MIPS_HI16 one because R_MIPS_HI16 uses combined addend (AHI << 16) + (short)ALO where AHI is original R_MIPS_HI16 addend and ALO is addend of the matching R_MIPS_LO16 relocation [1]. There are two

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Simon Atanasyan <simon at atanasyan.com> > wrote: >> >> In case of MIPS O32 ABI we have to find a matching R_MIPS_LO16 >> relocation to calculate R_MIPS_HI16 one because R_MIPS_HI16 uses >> combined addend (AHI << 16) + (short)ALO where AHI is

I put a new video card in a previously stable system, no other changes. Now WoW, Ventrilo, and City of Heroes all work for a little while then crash, sometimes with an error message, sometimes without. System: AMD Phenomx4, 5gig RAM Fedora core 10 x64, installed from disk, fully updated Wine 1.1.14, installed through yum New video card: Nvidia geforce 9800gt, 1gig memory Current video driver:

Hi all, I've got some problems to make work oVirt. I've installed a Fedora 10 VM the lightest possible (nothing checked, even based) and installed after some packages (wget, sudo, acpid,...) and updated the system. By the way, acpid should be a dependency of ovirt-installer because the installation fails if it's not available. I've then installed ovirt (ovirt-server-installer

Hi, I installed Fedora 10 as domU on CentOS 5.3. I need new 2.6.25.14 kernel under domU (in order to patch it for MPLS protocol). I followed advice on http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Kernel.org_Linux_on_Xen, and compiled kernel with XEN options enabled under domU. I got all relevant packages in /boot and /lib/modules, but when I try to boot virtual machine I got this error: Error starting