similar to: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6422] New: rsync needlessly aborts when getcwd() fails

On 02/05/2018 01:33 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > Do you have strace output going further back, at least to the proceeding > getcwd call?? It would be interesting to see which path the kernel > reports, and if it starts with "(unreachable)". I got the strace output now, but it very difficult to read (chdir in a multi-threaded process ?). My current inclination is to blame

Hi, As a quick workaround for geo-replication to work. Please configure the following option. gluster vol geo-replication <mastervol> <slavehost>::<slavevol> config access_mount true The above option will not do the lazy umount and as a result, all the master and slave volume mounts maintained by geo-replication can be accessed by others. It's also visible in df output.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6116 Summary: Cannot access files in exposed shadow drive in version 3.0.5 Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6788 Summary: rsync does not abort early but needlessly transfers data if destination is write protected Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5506 Summary: support utime differences at runtime, not configure/build time Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: All URL: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.rsync.general/1794 8 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3667 Summary: touch rsync configure output Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: vapier@gentoo.org QAContact:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1748 Summary: getcwd being called with invalid argument in servconf.c Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.4p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4787 Summary: add support for --max-delete=N where N is less than 0 Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

The getpwd() function in dash assumed than getcwd(0, 0) will allocate the buffer dynamically using malloc(); however, this glibc extension is not implemented by klibc. Make getpwd() use a temporary buffer and invoke savestr() itself instead of relying on a nonstandard extension. Signed-off-by: Sergey Vlasov <vsu at altlinux.ru> --- Alternatively, you may pull from the following git repo

We recently discovered that our OpenSSH distribution binaries contain retpoline thunks. It's due to this OSSH_CHECK_CFLAG_COMPILE([-mfunction-return=thunk]) # gcc OSSH_CHECK_CFLAG_COMPILE([-mindirect-branch=thunk]) # gcc This was quite surprising because at least the GNU/Linux userspace has no provisions for retpolines. You also fail to enable -fno-plt, so you need

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1739 Summary: getcwd does not support size zero argument on Solaris Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.4p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2949 Bug ID: 2949 Summary: "limits at openssh.com" extension to SFTP to query various transfer limits Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

Hello, I'm using cwRync to backup my users computeurs. When he closing her Windows session i go (with GPO) a script batch to copy a files/dirs on my rsync server (OpenMediaVault). When i manuel start the script it's ok but when he go to the closed session i've this error rsync: getcwd():Bad address(14) rsync error: errors selecting input/output files, dirs (code3) at util.c

Hi fully expecting to have done something silly here but am struggling to debug why I am getting the error: Error: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on SERVER: No such file or directory - getcwd at /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes.pp:2 on node my.domain.net the line in question is getting a custom module which has not changed recently. I was installing

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1078 Summary: passing --without-kerberos5 still checks for some kerberos support Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Documentation AssignedTo:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1234 Summary: configure adds opensc libs to LDFLAGS when it should use LIBS Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2369 Bug ID: 2369 Summary: `ssh-keygen -A` errors on RSA1 when building with SSH1 disabled Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.9p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh-keygen

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1294 Summary: includes.h should pull in string.h based on HAVE_STRING_H Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: bitbucket

Hi, ? Kotresh workaround works for me. But before I tried it, I created some strace-logs for Florian. setup: 2 VMs?(192.168.222.120 master, 192.168.222.121 slave), both with a volume named vol with Ubuntu?16.04.3,?glusterfs 3.13.2, rsync 3.1.1 . ? Best regards, Tino ? root at master:~# cat /usr/bin/rsync #!/bin/bash strace -o /tmp/rsync.trace -ff /usr/bin/rsynco "$@" ? One of the traces

On 09/21/2012 05:52 AM, Martinez, Javier E wrote: > The proposal comments have largely centered on the string functions. Do > people feel the same way about memcpy_s? What about those of you > building LLVM on Windows with Visual Studio? Is memcmp_s (or a variant thereof) a win in practice? It covers the case pretty well where you try to copy a dynamically sized buffer to the start