similar to: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5801] New: Sparse (-S) option doesn't work with new files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7854 Summary: Abysmal sparse file performance Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: grarpamp at gmail.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6816 Summary: Delta-transfer algorithm does not reuse already transmitted identical blocks Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6788 Summary: rsync does not abort early but needlessly transfers data if destination is write protected Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8265 Summary: Long paths, hardlinks, 'special' files [was: Regression: sockets for 3.0.9pre1] Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: core AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8918 Summary: Use fiemap to quickly detect zero ranges of source file Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

I have a 5.5GB file, mostly sparse. Tar performs far[!] better than rsync. I have no ideas yet, so just an FYI as to current state. FreeBSD 8.1 i386 zfs Yes, I know the blocks used differs but don't know why yet, could be just how zfs does things or related to the large amount of sparseness. There are no media errors, CPU/IO load or anything like that and the source and dest paths are on the

Hi, I detected a silly behaviour of rsync when new hardlinks of already synced files are created: Scenario: There are a local directory and a equal remote directory created by former run of rsync. Create a hardlink from a already existing file (both inside the local directory). If this hardlink has a filename with comes before the original filename when both are sorted in alphabetic order,

Hi list, I often save the content of a hardware device (a harddisk partition with a not-so-stable non-unix OS on it) on a backup disk which is connected over the network. Until now I used 'dd' to make a clone file of the device (dd if=/dev/hda2 of=disk.raw bs=2M) and then I copied or rsynced this file with the network copy. It would be nice if rsync would also be able to synchronise the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7337 Summary: sparse files not equally sparse on destination Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: brian at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5373 Summary: rsync uses more space in destination even with -S specified Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: PA-RISC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7778 Summary: --inplace does extra WRITE operations Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ildar at altlinux.ru

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5894 Summary: Incompatible library version Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: david.allie@usa.net QAContact:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7109 Summary: Need to define NO_SYMLINK_XATTR on Linux Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: matt at mattmccutchen.net

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6752 Summary: --force option doesn't work as expected/documented Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ciolfi at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7773 Summary: Please add a switch to preserve ownership on the receiving side Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6038 Summary: failed: No such file or directory (2) Product: rsync Version: 2.6.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: jglossop@kennedytech.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6915 Summary: Reject passing an argument to an option that doesn't take one Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5201 Summary: Rsync lets user corrupt dest by applying non-inplace batch in inplace mode Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7194 Summary: Getting --inplace and --sparse to work together Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: jansen at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6027 Summary: Error when rsync encounters empty symlinks Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: kai@kaishome.de