Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "rsync 3's -E and -X"
2006 Nov 01
2
Xattr on FreeBSD ... Good Luck ?
Thanks for the help on the missing '-p1' for the acl and xattr
patches. Things are configuring and making properly now.
However, I couldn't help noticing this during the configure:
checking whether to support ACLs... ACLs requested -- running tests
checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no
checking for ACL support... yes
checking ACL test results... Using posix ACLs
checking for
2006 Nov 01
2
unsuccessful configure with 2.6.8 and acls and extended attributes...
(FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE)
tar xzvf rsync-2.6.8.tar.gz
cd rsync-2.6.8.tar.gz
patch < patches/acls.diff
patch < ./patches/xattrs.diff
./prepare-source
./configure --enable-acl-support --enable-xattr-support --disable-debug
--with-rsyncd-conf=/usr/local/etc/rsyncd.conf --bindir=/usr/local/bin
Couldn't be more simple. But...when I try to 'make' :
(snip)
gcc -I. -I. -g -O2
2008 Jun 22
3
Xattrs and Delete over AFP
Hello group,
I have an OSX 10.3.9 Server that I'm trying to back up with rsync 3.0.2.
Since I didn't have any luck with the 10.3.9 patch and I do have 10.4 clients,
I decided to try running the backup over AFP (Apple's file sharing protocol).
I found a way to mount the AFP volume with root permissions and rsync 3.0.2
works very nicely using this on the 10.4 clients, preserving
2009 Apr 18
8
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6276] New: crtimes.patch does not preserve creation dates on Mac x86_64 only
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6276
Summary: crtimes.patch does not preserve creation dates on Mac
x86_64 only
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2014 Dec 14
0
rsync not copy all information for font file
Hi Ram,
In OS X, some font types (not all) put the font payload in the resource fork. Netatalk provides AFP filesharing, imitating the resource forks by creating secondary files in ?.Appledouble? folders within each folder. Netatalk tracks the resource forks, and other metadata, by keeping a ?Desktop database? at the root of the shared volume ? look for .AppleDesktop, and .AppleDB.
You can
2008 Feb 01
0
rsync Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1
Yep
Zane
-----Original Message-----
From: rsync-bounces+zane_brady=trimble.com@lists.samba.org [mailto:rsync-bounces+zane_brady=trimble.com@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of rsync-request@lists.samba.org
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 7:01 AM
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: rsync Digest, Vol 62, Issue 1
Send rsync mailing list submissions to
rsync@lists.samba.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe
2011 Apr 19
0
rsync Digest, Vol 100, Issue 14
I have it up and working. for me at least.
http://crypotworksapps.blogspot.com/2011/04/windows-and-linux-backups-made-dirt.html
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:00 AM, <rsync-request at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Send rsync mailing list submissions to
> ? ? ? ?rsync at lists.samba.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> ? ? ?
2007 Dec 02
3
creation date and OSX
Hi,
I've been using rsync (OSX Tiger now Leopard) to backup my home
folder daily using -a -H -A -X link-dest=dir to make incremental
backups. There was a problem though since many files especially
images, movies etc would be recopied each time instead of creating
hard links. I have been testing the pre5 release and found that it
seems to make hard links correctly for all files. I
2015 Apr 22
0
Changing only file permissions
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Normally, I would say that --checksum is actually slower than just
> letting rsync re-copy everything
Depends on the network capacity and costs associated with that bandwidth :(
>and therefore is almost always the
> wrong thing to do.
Nope,
2020 May 18
2
[PATCH] SSE2/SSSE3 optimized version of get_checksum1() for x86-64
I don't disagree that MD5 could (or even should) be replaced so it is
no longer the bottleneck in several real-world cases (including mine).
However this patch is not for MD5 performance, rather for the rolling
checksum rsync uses to match blocks on existing files on both ends to
reduce transfer size.
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 5:44 PM Filipe Maia via rsync
<rsync at lists.samba.org>
2007 Oct 17
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5022] New: FreeBSD 4.11 - Compilation Fails - uidlist.c - gcc2 / gcc3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5022
Summary: FreeBSD 4.11 - Compilation Fails - uidlist.c - gcc2 /
gcc3
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: x86
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2008 Feb 25
0
Fwd: Making rsync compile under Mac OS X 10.3.9 with extended attributes
Precisions:
If I run my patched rsync on 10.4 instead of 10.3, it's my function
that returns an error:
rsync: rsync_xal_set: lsetxattr("Src/60-bsd-flags/dir-with-
flags","com.apple.FinderInfo") failed: Unknown error: -5000 (-5000)
And error -5000 means:
afpAccessDenied
-5000
User does not have the correct access to the file
Directory cannot be shared
Available in Mac OS
2010 Aug 17
6
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7625] New: "Don't know how to make ./*.c"
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7625
Summary: "Don't know how to make ./*.c"
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.7
Platform: s390
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: sebastian.hoffman at
2003 Jun 25
3
patch draft for extended attributes on linux
This draft patch adds support for transferring extended attributes
with a new --xattr option. It ought to work on Linux with XFS or
ext2/ext3 filesystems with the SGI/bestbits attribute system.
It is partially working, but there seems to be some kind of hang bug
while transferring the file list. I suspect it might be provoking a
problem in io.c.
You need to rerun autoconf, autoheader and
2020 May 18
6
[PATCH] SSE2/SSSE3 optimized version of get_checksum1() for x86-64
This drop-in patch increases the performance of the get_checksum1()
function on x86-64.
On the target slow CPU performance of the function increased by nearly
50% in the x86-64 default SSE2 mode, and by nearly 100% if the
compiler was told to enable SSSE3 support. The increase was over 200%
on the fastest CPU tested in SSSE3 mode.
Transfer time improvement with large files existing on both ends
2020 May 18
0
[PATCH] SSE2/SSSE3 optimized version of get_checksum1() for x86-64
I think this is a great patch but, in my view, an even better way to tackle
the fundamental problem (the performance limitations) is to use a much
faster checksum like xxhash, as has been suggested before:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2019-October/031975.html
Cheers,
Filipe
On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 17:08, Jorrit Jongma via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org>
wrote:
> This drop-in
2007 Apr 26
0
Patch to fix missing "popt.h" make error
Hi,
Frequently when compiling rsync, I get this error during the make process:
gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -c options.c -o options.o
options.c:24:18: popt.h: No such file or directory
make: *** [options.o] Error 1
This is easily fixed by changing line 24 of options.c from:
#include <popt.h>
to
#include "popt/popt.h"
Thanks!
--
Phil Hassey
VP, Product
2020 May 19
5
[PATCHv2] SSE2/SSSE3 optimized version of get_checksum1() for x86-64
I've read up some more on the subject, and it seems the proper way to
do this with GCC is g++ and target attributes. I've refactored the
patch that way, and it indeed uses SSSE3 automatically on supporting
CPUs, regardless of the build host, so this should be ideal both for
home builders and distros.
Getting the code to build right in c++ mode (checksum_sse2.cpp only)
was a bit of an
2014 Dec 15
2
rsync not copy all information for font file
Hi Bryan,
thanks for your kind reply but it happend only with some fonts not all font file, (email with attachment is under verification by admin, so i resend this without attachment file) here i attach 2 screenshot one original folder and second backup folder, you can notice that the font .otf, .ttf, .dfont have no problem in rsync it copied as it is but the font that not show extension (Font
2015 Apr 22
1
Changing only file permissions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
No, even if bandwidth is your concern I would say that --checksum is
wrong. Maybe if bandwidth is so scarse that a few KB vs a few MB
equates to dollars then sure, use --checksum. Otherwise, letting
rsync re-delta-xfer everything is certainly faster and not much more
bandwidth intensive than --checksum. Plus that is only if you screwed
up and ran