similar to: Factor out .rsyncsums logic into a separate checksum-caching library?

This is a suggestion for adding to rsync an option "--checksum-path=PROGRAM". Once this option is given, provided it is accompained by option "--checksum", both the receiving and sending side of rsync would compute checksums calling PROGRAM, instead of the usual checksum program. Why is this usefull? Suppose I have two collections of MP3 files at different locations which I

Hi, as scanning large repositories for each client connection causes unnecessary CPU/IO load, I want to know if is it possible to generate checksum digest files on the server, meanwhile? Best regards, Renne

On 6/30/07, Wayne Davison <wayned@samba.org> committed: > Added Files: > checksum-xattr.diff > Log Message: > A simple patch that lets rsync use cached checksum values stored in > each file's extended attributes. A perl script is provided to create > and update the values. Wayne, You should be aware of two drawbacks of caching checksums in xattrs: First,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4573 Summary: Hide/protect filtering of xattrs by name Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: hashproduct+rsync@gmail.com

On Jan 22, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Sebastian Hosche <sebastian.hosche at web.de> wrote: > Hi Charles, > > Thanks so much for your quick and detailed reply! I've added my answers and details inline. Sorry this reply wasn't as quick. > On 22.1.2015 04:46, Charles Lepple wrote: >> On Jan 21, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Sebastian Hosche <sebastian.hosche at web.de> wrote:

Hi Charles, Thanks so much for your quick and detailed reply! I've added my answers and details inline. On 22.1.2015 04:46, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jan 21, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Sebastian Hosche <sebastian.hosche at web.de> > wrote: > >> First issue: whatever I set as the offdelay, seems to be ignored and >> the UPS just cuts the power about 2sec after receiving

Hi everyone! I played around with rsync sources a little and wrote a small patch that computes the checksums from parts of the files only. I'm just writing to ask if the rsync developers would have any interest in the sort of functionality described below. If you do, I'm willing to work with you to produce a cleaned up patch for git. For background: This started as a way to satisfy an

I'm needing a way to full text index a bunch of pdfs so that I can search them from a web front end. Beagle would be ideal. Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending upon your viewpoint), mono, and mono apps, will likely never see the light of day in RHEL. I'm looking for the most straightforward way to get beagle installed. I don't need the gnome gui, just beaglelib, beagled, and

Hi, there was a message in the list at Fri 26 Oct 2007 21:13:58, that beagle was added to centos testing repo. But I could not find it there. Please could someone give me an advice. Thank's a lot! "We have added beagle-0.2.18, tomboy-0.8.1, and mono-1.2.4 to the CentOS-5 testing repo for both x86_64 and i386." Are there any experiences with beagle under centos 5? Is it usable now

Hi Folks Can anyone help me with the following error - is it serious; is the file transferred; are the other files transferred? [morgan@morgansmachine ~]$ rsync -a -X -A -z -v /home/morgan/Documents 192.168.1.30:/home/morgan/Documents morgan@192.168.1.30's password: building file list ... done rsync: rsync_xal_set:

Hi Renato, > > Sorry but the goal of Debian porterboxes is not for upstream testing > > their software but for packaging purposes. > > > > You should instead have a look to the GCC compilation farm: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm > > Some LLVM developers are using these servers for testing LLVM and > > Dragonegg. > > > > Hi Folks,

Hi, I've developped a native win32 beagle client that along with a patched beagle daemon running on the samba server enables indexing and searching samba shares in a windows environment. It is not related to the ci-skads google soc project that was proposed by the samba team, and can be viewed as a partial/temporary solution. Further information and download:

Hi Folks I've gone back over the list and the only reference I've found to "Invalid argument (22)" is here: http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2006-May/015478.html That seems a different context of character set mismatches. The common parts to my errors are: rsync: rsync_xal_set: lsetxattr("...","security.selinux") failed: Invalid argument (22) And:

Hello, I am trying to cross compile LLVM. Build and compile on Mac OS X 10.5.7 Target is an Angstrom Linux Cortex-A8 Beagle board. I would like to avoid GPLv3. I can compile. But when I run my executable on Beagle crt0.S is calling an AngelSWI to setup the heap and stack. But the AngelSWI seems to just be a stub because it returns zeros for the pointers. That leads to a segfault. If I hack in

On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:22:14PM -0800, Craig Barratt wrote: > And I have several things I would like to work on and submit: > > - Fix the MD4 block and file checksums to comply with the rfc > (currently MD4 is wrong for blocks of size 64*n, or files > longer than 512MB). > > - Adaptive first pass checksum lengths: use 3 or more bytes of the MD4 > block

This is incredibly basic, but... I have a form that has fields defined for password and password_confirmation. it is passing in the following data Parameters: {"commit"=>"Change Password", "admin"=>{"password_confirmation"=>"beagle", "password"=>"beagle"}, "id"=>"3" I thought that

We have added beagle-0.2.18, tomboy-0.8.1, and mono-1.2.4 to the CentOS-5 testing repo for both x86_64 and i386. Please see this link for how to use the testing repo: http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories/ Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital

Hi Folks, is there someone who has desktop-search-engine Beagle installed on CentOS 4.4? If so - can you give me some hints (links, howtos)? Thx Timothy

Hello everyone, >AFAIR, there were several beagles in LLVM Lab. You might want to check with Galina about how live they are. Yes, we have couple beagleboards. I can make them available if this will add value. Maybe we should set a special "release" buildmaster? Which would orchestrate slow bootstrapped builds with extensive testing and collect binaries. This lets us unify the way

Renato, >> cortex-a9 sounds fine. It'd be cool if we verified those binaries >> run on a cortex-a8 and a cortex-a15, too. It'd be very, very strange >> if they didn't, but hey, catching very, very strange problems is what >> release testing is for, right? :) > Actually, this is a good idea, I'll set up a Beagle as a buildbot and see > what happens to