similar to: [Bug 3202] rsync crash with long directory structure

Hi, we use attachment dedup with lots of emails (still migrating to it from maildir). We use netapp storage with wafl filesystem over nfs. Problem is that netapp has hard limit of 100k hardlinks to one file. And we encountered it. Problem is that dovecot start do segfault (lmtp,dsync,pop3 etc) when it happend when tried to deliver new emails with that attachment. Here is strace of dsync: 6740

Hello, we have 2 netapp arrays with 2 volumes and we need to store our mail data in one or other volume for every user. We want keep data for one user in one volume only. So we would like to have 2 separate mail_attachment_dir, one on every volume. But in latest version 2.2.12 it look like it is only possible to set one global mail_attachment_dir. I have an idea with 2 separate dovecot

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, sis attachment deduplication is broken in 2.2.16 upwards. It is caused by this commit. https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/664bf3e236c214aee86294483c379e4fa66c2e63 in src/lib-fs/fs-sis.c function fs_sis_try_link() is comparation of inodes of hash files. Because fs_stat() after that commit use fstat() on open fd of temporary file instead of

Hi, i have setup with mail_attachment single instance store + replication + zlib and got this bug when i try to replicate one test mailbox: On master1 in mail.log: Apr 10 13:25:22 master1 dovecot: dsync-local(zzz at blabla666.sk): Error: read(/nfsmnt/mailnfs1/attachments1/6b/57/6b57ad34cf6c414662233d833a7801fde4e1cdcb-92b5052558774653a728000013e2b982[base64:18 b/l]) failed: Stream is larger than

Hi, anyone using one way (or master/slave) replication instead of master/master ? There is no info in documentation but in sources (src/doveadm/dsync/doveadm-dsync.c) i found some flags which looks like for setting up master/slave switch (c) { case '1': ctx->oneway = TRUE; ctx->backup = TRUE; break; case

Hi, current version of courier migration script courier-dovecot-migrate.pl preserve order of POP3 UIDLs, but it keep IMAP UIDs not in order which cause problems with clients using IMAP along with POP3 in some cases. Attached patch use MAIL_FETCH_POP3_ORDER feature added in version 2.0.13 to keep POP3 and IMAP UID[L]s in order. -- [ Ohodnotte kvalitu mailu:

On 3/9/2016 9:02 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > On 08 Mar 2016, at 01:50, Pavel Stano <stanojr at websupport.sk> wrote: >> >> sis attachment deduplication is broken in 2.2.16 upwards. >> It is caused by this commit. >> https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/664bf3e236c214aee86294483c379e4fa66c2e63 >> >> in src/lib-fs/fs-sis.c function

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7057 Summary: Buffer overflow when sending a file with long name Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557916 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3649 Summary: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry Product: rsync Version: 2.6.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: sambesselink@planet.nl

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8001 Summary: buffer overflow in recv_file_entry (maxpathlen doesn't works) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

I installed the newly released version of cwRsync today on a few Windows machines and have noticed a new problem that I have not seen mentioned anywhere. When syncing to an NT machine used for backups, my rsync client exited at the end of the transfer with the following message to standard error: multiplexing overflow 1:296 [sender] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5235 Summary: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: rsync@ofdan.co.uk

I believe this post I found is related to a problem I'm having with long files names...I would like to use cwRsync, does my problem suggest this is still happening and has not been addressed? http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-April/012117.html However, I have long file name issues using rsync 2.6.6 from a BSD server to the default Cygwin rsync 2.6.6. Should I (and how do I) apply

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3202 Bug ID: 3202 Summary: Ed25519 key on HSM is not getting listed in ssh-add -l command Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.2p1 Hardware: ARM64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh-add

Hello all Im using sftp 1:4.7p1-8ubuntu1.2 in a batchjob Ive noticed that sftp needs a long time for sending a filelist. The timespan increases exponential if many files are on the remoteserver. for example "ls -la *.txt" needs 10 seconds for 2000 files but needs 50 seconds for 4000 files. For 150.000 Files i have to wait 15 minutes for example but the

Hi, I've got a File name too long problem using rsync-2.5.6 or rsync 2.5.5-0.1 (debian) I had a look to the mailing list archive and to the todo file and all I've seen was that the problem only appears on old special systems. I'm using debian 2.2.20. (is it too old?) I've already posted this bug in debian bug tracking system

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11978 Bug ID: 11978 Summary: mkstemp failed: File name too long (36) when filename is under the limit Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8308 Summary: rsync: exclude.c:532: change_local_filter_dir: Assertion `dir_depth < 4096/2+1' failed Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core

This patch adds some queue limit parameters into block drive. And inits them for sg block drive. Some interfaces are also added for accessing them. Signed-off-by: Cong Meng <mc at linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- block/raw-posix.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ block_int.h | 4 +++ blockdev.c | 15 +++++++++++++ hw/block-common.h | 3 ++ 4 files

This patch adds some queue limit parameters into block drive. And inits them for sg block drive. Some interfaces are also added for accessing them. Signed-off-by: Cong Meng <mc at linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- block/raw-posix.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ block_int.h | 4 +++ blockdev.c | 15 +++++++++++++ hw/block-common.h | 3 ++ 4 files