samba-bugs at samba.org
2016-Jun-15 20:16 UTC
[Bug 11978] New: mkstemp failed: File name too long (36) when filename is under the limit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11978 Bug ID: 11978 Summary: mkstemp failed: File name too long (36) when filename is under the limit Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: sambabug1.nobled at spamgourmet.com QA Contact: rsync-qa at samba.org Using mkstemp adds on 7 characters to the filename, which creates a problem when the filename is below, but close to, the limit of the filesystem. You can see this when rsync'ing from one ecryptfs filesystem to another, which will fail even though both have the exact same 143-byte filename limit, if a filename consists of more than 136 bytes. Is there any reason the .XXXXXX in the argument to mkstemp can't *replace* the last 7 characters in the filename, instead of being appended to it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2016-Jun-15 20:27 UTC
[Bug 11978] mkstemp failed: File name too long (36) when filename is under the limit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11978 --- Comment #1 from Syr <sambabug1.nobled at spamgourmet.com> --- https://git.samba.org/rsync.git/?p=rsync.git;a=blob;f=receiver.c;hb=3267d6a9ceeefad438080b17c02daa7775820803#l143 Wait, it actually adds 8 characters to it in total, there's a dot prepended at the beginning to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2016-Jun-15 20:36 UTC
[Bug 11978] mkstemp failed: File name too long (36) when filename is under the limit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11978 --- Comment #2 from Syr <sambabug1.nobled at spamgourmet.com> --- Triple post. Shouldn't it also use e.g. f_namelen from statfs() at runtime instead of a compile-time constant? And MAXPATHLEN doesn't even seem to reflect reality, since it's not actually limited to that on Linux. https://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2012/01/msg00166.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2018-Jun-25 11:08 UTC
[Bug 11978] mkstemp failed: File name too long (36) when filename is under the limit
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11978 Mauro Molinari <mauromol at tiscali.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mauromol at tiscali.it --- Comment #3 from Mauro Molinari <mauromol at tiscali.it> --- I'm also encountering problems regarding mkstemp "file name too long error" when rsyncing to an ecryptfs filesystem. Probably, rsync should try to handle this in a smarter way. A secondary problem I see is that, even if this error is given, the whole file is transferred from source to target anyway, although not actually saved on the target. So, if the file is huge and the bandwidth is low, this is a serious waste. Using rsync 3.0.9 on local side (target) and rsync 3.1.1 on remote side (source). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [Bug 68835] New: Unknown opcode 0x43 + protection fault on a Graphics Blaster Riva TNT card
- [Bug 74164] New: [NV04] Native monitor resolution missing
- [Bug 68854] New: [NV04] PROTECTION_ERROR / PROTECTION_FAULT
- [Bug 67161] New: Blank video after resuming from S3 or S4
- chooseCRANmirror