similar to: Inheriting security permissions from target directory with Cygwin

Hi, the following patch checks if OpenSSH is running under a Cygwin version >= 1.3.2 which allows switching user context without password. Otherwise sshd allows changing the user context only if password authentication is used as it was before. Corinna Index: openbsd-compat/bsd-cygwin_util.c =================================================================== RCS file:

Case point: 2 Servers (both with Windows Server 2k3 & cygwin). Running ssh on the destination server. Problem: The rsync user will take ownership over any files copied over from the source server. This takes ownership away from the administrators group, thus disallowing inherited permissions. Is there any way around not taking ownership away from the administrators group and giving it to the

I've just tried upgrading to cwrsync 2.1.0 (Rsync version 3.0.0 protocol version 30) between 2 Windows XP Pro sp2 machine across the Internet. I used: SET CYGWIN=nontsec SET HOME=c:\cwrsync\bin C:\cwrsync\bin\rsync -za -u -P --delete --recursive /cygdrive/c/test2/ stuart@test.address.co.uk::test/ When I run the above batch script on the remote machine I get this odd output.

Hi, I have left this slip through already too long. When compiling openbsd-compat/bsd-cygwin_util.c, the following warnings appear: openbsd-compat/bsd-cygwin_util.c: In function `binary_open': openbsd-compat/bsd-cygwin_util.c:67: warning: implicit declaration of function `open' openbsd-compat/bsd-cygwin_util.c: In function `binary_pipe': openbsd-compat/bsd-cygwin_util.c:73:

Hi, the following patch rearranges some checkings in bsd-cygwin-util.c to keep in sync with Cygwin versions. I moved the uname() check into it's own function so that it's easier to add further checks when necessary. Corinna Index: openbsd-compat/bsd-cygwin_util.c =================================================================== RCS file:

Hi all, Thank-you to all the developers for rsync. It is very well done. I have rsync running on various platforms connecting to the same server and all is good. Except for 1 Win2000 Prof. server. I backup several directories with various permissions and users successfully. However, there are 2 directories that even though the permissions are the same as other directories that are

On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 11:09 -0700, Robert Carr wrote: > include/compiz.h | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+) > > New commits: > commit 2402215a6a3bd50e9d87e99d4a45de14b635ecea > Merge: 1b0ae38... 7f518da... > Author: Robert Carr <racarr@gorbie.(none)> > Date: Wed Apr 25 14:09:38 2007 -0400 > > Merge branch 'master' of

Hi, the attached patch file contains two patches in one: - contrib/cygwin/ssh-host-config: Create sshd_config according to latest changes. - openbsd-compat/bsd-cygwin_util.c: Rewrite a bit to allow easier retrieval of Cygwin capabilities from version number (uname). For Cygwin versions beginning with API minor version 56 assume ntsec being on by default. Thanks in advance for applying

Hi all, (i am new at rsync althought using it for a year and half) i was unable to find a direct answer to this questions : _does rsync under windowz really support ACL replication ?_ if I "rsync" a directory, files inherit from the acl of that dir. but if special acls are setted on some files these are lost in the replication : only inherited acls are written i tried this with rsync

I have released rsync version 2.6.5pre2 -- the second (and hopefully final) pre-release for 2.6.5. The 2.6.5 release is primarily a bug-fix release to squash some annoying bugs that made it into 2.6.4, though a few minor enhancements did make it in as well. To see all the changes since 2.6.4, go here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.5pre1-NEWS To read the pre-release man

I have released rsync version 2.6.5pre2 -- the second (and hopefully final) pre-release for 2.6.5. The 2.6.5 release is primarily a bug-fix release to squash some annoying bugs that made it into 2.6.4, though a few minor enhancements did make it in as well. To see all the changes since 2.6.4, go here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.5pre1-NEWS To read the pre-release man

Greetings, Does anyone know of an R code for classification and regression tree analysis (CART)? Thank you Ron Ron Thornton BVSc, PhD, MACVSc (pathology, epidemiology) Programme Co-ordinator, Active Surveillance Animal Biosecurity MAF Biosecurity Authority P O Box 2526 Wellington, New Zealand phone: 64-4-4744156 027 223 7582 fax: 64-4-474-4133 e-mail: ron.thornton at maf.govt.nz

Rafa?l Carr? wrote: > That would need a special case for Linux x32 which is x86_64 with 32 > bits pointers It won't be wrong for x32, just sub-optimal. Please feel free to suggest a way to detect x32. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/

Thanks for the reply. We are currently using AMBE (4Kbps) for our Traffic/Weather Channels. If you have ever had a chance to hear the service, you will know that AMBE does not do us well. I understand that 2Kbps is low quality, but any poorer than AMBE? If can get a decent quality for other low bandwidth talk channels, such as about 10-16Kbps and have it sound rather clean, then I would be

Hi all, I'm rsyncing a windows 2003 client to a windows 2003 server using the cwrsync installation package. The trouble is that the permission rights set by rsync on the destination server are very restrictive and don't allow another application to access the files. I'd like to change that. However, the GID and UID parameters in the rsyncd.conf file don't seem to manage that.

Hi all, Can anyone explain this to me? (CentOS 4/5) # rpm -qf /etc/exports setup # rpm -V setup S.5....T c /etc/bashrc S.5....T c /etc/printcap ..?..... c /etc/securetty # echo '#### foo' > /etc/exports # cat /etc/exports #### foo # rpm -V setup S.5....T c /etc/bashrc S.5....T c /etc/printcap ..?..... c /etc/securetty I thought verify was supposed to check

Hello, I’ve been using LLVM IR passes for my research for about a year now, but for my next step I think I might have to dig into a backend. I'm hoping someone could give me a pointer on how to get started. The thing I would like to do is add and override address-size override prefix [1] to a given x86-64 instruction. I’m hoping I can do something like: 1) Mark some IR instructions with

Thanks Jim, that's understood. When I say AMBE isn't working well, I only mean from the audience acceptance point of view. Technically it is fine. It is exactly doing the job we had expected. It's the long standing wish that everyone wants... More for less. We are just seeking a bit of magic that just may not be there. Ideally finding a codec that can perform

I'm trying to make a security sandbox. For example, lets say my program has a LoadInst in the LLVM IR and I know I want to confine the address range this LoadInst is accessing. Maybe that LoadInst gets emitted as a MOV machine code instruction by the backend. During execution an attacker could potentially control the operands of the MOV instruction through some exploit, but usually he

. Monday, July 5, 2004 15:50:06 (-08:00hrs UTC) Hello asterisk-users, From the following post: On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Joe Baptista wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Randy Bush wrote: >> i did not criticize the protocol. remember, my question started >> with >> >> >> i am looking at iax to