asterisk users - Jul 2004 - Randy Bush is a destructive force with a hidden professional agenda

.                                       Monday, July 5, 2004
                                        15:50:06 (-08:00hrs UTC)
Hello asterisk-users,

  From the following post:

On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Joe Baptista wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
>> i did not criticize the protocol.  remember, my question started
>> with
>>
>> >> i am looking at iax to see if it is applicable to my needs.
>>
>> i don't need nats, nat traversal, nat anything.  if i did, iax
>> might well be one of the technologies i would consider.  but i
>> don't.
> Your up to no good again.  Trying to troll?  Look Bush it pretty easy - if
> you want a PBX use asterisk if not go away.
> regards
> joe
  Watch out for this man Bush! He is a professional espionage troll
  and hides his agent status behind his condescending facade.

  What do you want Randy? Go back to Admiralty way with all your
  ICANNite cronies if you're not going to behave here!

  Your on notice as of now and you're being watched. Don't try to
  destroy this community like the trail of destruction behind you!

  If you wanna play nice in the sandbox then okay, but most people
  know better than to trust you any farther than they can throw you
  already - This community and the associated technologies aren't
  subject to usurpation by the "Special Interest" groups that fund
  your espionage and agitation activities!

  Lots of people on this list already know who are - the bane of DNS.

-- 
Kindest regards,


Bradley D. Thornton
Manager Network Services 
NorthTech Computer

------------------------------------------------
There are 10 kinds of people in this world...
Those who understand binary and those who don't.
------------------------------------------------

he did i tell you! i'm still in counselling... altho come to think , i was
in
counselling anyway.. 

Steve

On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Bradley D. Thornton wrote:
> .                                       Monday, July 5, 2004
>                                         15:50:06 (-08:00hrs UTC)
> Hello asterisk-users,
> 
>   From the following post:
> 
> On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Joe Baptista wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
> 
> >> i did not criticize the protocol.  remember, my question started
> >> with
> >>
> >> >> i am looking at iax to see if it is applicable to my
needs.
> >>
> >> i don't need nats, nat traversal, nat anything.  if i did, iax
> >> might well be one of the technologies i would consider.  but i
> >> don't.
> 
> > Your up to no good again.  Trying to troll?  Look Bush it pretty easy
- if
> > you want a PBX use asterisk if not go away.
> 
> > regards
> > joe
> 
>   Watch out for this man Bush! He is a professional espionage troll
>   and hides his agent status behind his condescending facade.
> 
>   What do you want Randy? Go back to Admiralty way with all your
>   ICANNite cronies if you're not going to behave here!
> 
>   Your on notice as of now and you're being watched. Don't try to
>   destroy this community like the trail of destruction behind you!
> 
>   If you wanna play nice in the sandbox then okay, but most people
>   know better than to trust you any farther than they can throw you
>   already - This community and the associated technologies aren't
>   subject to usurpation by the "Special Interest" groups that
fund
>   your espionage and agitation activities!
> 
>   Lots of people on this list already know who are - the bane of DNS.
> 
>

Bradley D. Thornton wrote:
>>><snip>
>>>i don't need nats, nat traversal, nat anything.  if i did, iax
>>>might well be one of the technologies i would consider.  but i
>>>don't.
> 
> 
> <snip>
> 
>   Watch out for this man Bush! He is a professional espionage troll
>   and hides his agent status behind his condescending facade.
> 
>   What do you want Randy? Go back to Admiralty way with all your
>   ICANNite cronies if you're not going to behave here!
> 
I have no idea who Randy Bush is but I found it funny the first article 
I found on him was a presentation on why NAT is evil espically for 
voice. Now he asserts that NAT traversal is not needed.

http://www.apnic.net/meetings/17/docs/sigs/policy/addrpol-pres-randy-nats.pdf

Can anyone give me a quick rundown on why there's such discontent for 
this person

-Adam

Bradley D. Thornton [Bradley@NorthTech.US] wrote:
> Your on notice as of now and you're being watched. Don't try to
> destroy this community like the trail of destruction behind you!
> 
Who died and made you king of the mail list?