similar to: [Bug 1686] Could not transfer DBCS(Double byte Character set) filename

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1686 Summary: Could not transfer DBCS(Double byte Character set) filename Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8471 Summary: The file of DBCS file name contains DBCS second byte of x'5C' cause error. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Hi-- Ok. I?ve now run into the next thing I can?t find in man, and this time, I googled as well: --exclude /afs/\* I thought you could just say: --exclude /afs/* or even --exclude /afs/ To exclude the entire afs directory. Can you explain what the purpose of the \ and * are here? Thanks again :) All My Best, Jeffrey on 8/6/06 5:00 AM, rsync-request@lists.samba.org at

I had a case where I was using the --partial option (client is running rsync-pre5, server daemon is rsync-pre8). The transfer was interrupted and the partially transferred file replaced the destination file on the server. My understanding is that the partially transferred file would be kept but it would not replace the destination file...that is, both files would be kept so that rsync could pick

rsync: recv_generator: failed to stat "/freecom/backup/www/html/chris/info/computer/hardware/networkStorage/freecom/objects\00005151.pdf": Invalid argument The file exists OK. -- Chris Green

Hi, I would like to know the solution to the problem Rsync Hangs-up on file transfer. I have the same problem. http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2003-August/007018.html.. thanks -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xau.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 456 bytes Desc: not available Url :

Rsync has been a roller coaster ride for me.. One day it works fine the next day it doesn't. The error i'm recieving is : rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (399 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(165) What does this mean and or hint to as the problem? Also is there a Limit on the size of files Rsync can successfully handle?

I am using rsync to backup a machine with a large number of files, and I am getting this error. It would be helpful to know which files this is occuring with, to diagnose the problem. Is there a configuration option to rsync (that I may have missed) that will reveal this info. Alternatively, is there a source code patch that I could apply to rsync in order to find out? Thanks for any help Jon

Steve Sills Platnum Computers, President http://www.platnum.com steve@platnum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Sills" <steve@platnum.com> To: "jw schultz" <jw@pegasys.ws> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 1:52 PM Subject: Re: Rsync's Speed > The source server is a Dual 800 Mhz /w a 7200 RPM 40 GB HDD, the dest server > is a P III 450 with a

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3362 Summary: Add option to normalize Unicode filenames Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: mike@big.faceless.org

Sent from BlackBerry? on Airtel -----Original Message----- From: rsync-request@lists.samba.org Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:00:33 To:rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: rsync Digest, Vol 58, Issue 29 Send rsync mailing list submissions to rsync@lists.samba.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync or, via email, send a message with

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Normally, I would say that --checksum is actually slower than just > letting rsync re-copy everything Depends on the network capacity and costs associated with that bandwidth :( >and therefore is almost always the > wrong thing to do. Nope,

> On 25 May 2020, at 23:55, Wayne Davison via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I've decided to give hosting it on github a try, especially since there's been a lot of nice contributions lately. Hopefully this will make it easier for both the people sending patches as well as for me to snag the changes. I'll continue to push changes to the samba git as well.

Check if the FAQ here can be helpful: https://www.itefix.net/content/permissions-filesdirectories-are-clutteredmixed Tev 2016-07-01 14:00 GMT+02:00 <rsync-request at lists.samba.org>: > Send rsync mailing list submissions to > rsync at lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

problem is he's trying to rsync into the target dir and have the side effect of delete. so an empty dir would necessarily need to be in the target of course and thus created there, triggering the quota block. he tried to avoid this by using device files then 'blocking all device files' but i think rsync figures out first there's nothing to do, so it just stops and doesnt do the

Thanks Fabi, et all, I will follow up with your suggestion using ssh for renaming the directories after rsync. I appreciate the help. Freddie On Mon, Nov 25, 2019, 4:00 AM <rsync-request at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Send rsync mailing list submissions to > rsync at lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

Hi Ram, In OS X, some font types (not all) put the font payload in the resource fork. Netatalk provides AFP filesharing, imitating the resource forks by creating secondary files in ?.Appledouble? folders within each folder. Netatalk tracks the resource forks, and other metadata, by keeping a ?Desktop database? at the root of the shared volume ? look for .AppleDesktop, and .AppleDB. You can

Hi raf, Curious issue you have. A few things: What distro(s) are you using? Same rsync version on both ends? Hash of files look correct before and after the rsync? Have you tried using inotify to monitor for changes at the fs level? You should see a "read" on the sender and a "read" + "write" on the receiver. On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 11:25 PM raf via rsync

"Peter B. via rsync" <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On the [official website regarding rsync mailing > lists](https://rsync.samba.org/lists.html), the text contains a link: > > "but please [read this before posting]" > > Which points to: > https://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > > Which throws a "bad_domain_error"