similar to: [Bug 1471] New: Mention of patent issues in rsync docs

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1471 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Hi All, I am posting this querry second time. What i need is-- {Is there any command by which I can get only the updation of file ie only the incremental?. Suppose I have a text file say ss.txt of 3KB in size and I have taken the backup of this file. Now I am making the changes in to this file(ss.txt) by adding 1KB of data. Now I want this 1KB data (in to a new file) when I take the

Hai, Small update since i need som testers.. im trying to setup bi-directional sysvol replication. Unison has this ability. http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/ This is beta, so if you have successed, please report this back. DONT TEST THIS ON YOUR PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT. Thanks ! Louis

I am successfully using dovecot purely as a personal local mail store on my desktop. (There is only one account, and it's only ever accessed by local mail clients on the machine. The point is to have a common store I can use with any client; plus, I prefer dovecot's Mailbox storage to Thunderbird's mboxes.) Now I'd like if possible, to replicate this setup on my laptop and

Hi, I have a problem that I think rsync might be able to help solve: On a windows NT machine a process P1 is running which is creating files in a folder E:\output The files are typically fairly small, e.g. approximately 50 KB and process P1 may create in the order of 10,000 files a day. The files are created at a fairly constant rate throughout the day On a unix server another process P2 is

----- "g" <geleem at bellsouth.net> escreveu: > De: "g" <geleem at bellsouth.net> > Para: centos at centos.org > Enviadas: Ter?a-feira, 16 de Junho de 2015 13:28:33 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected > Assunto: [CentOS] using rsync to sync desktop /home/user of to laptop /home/user > > greetings, > > i want to sync my desktop home directory to my

> > > > I’m still not completely convinced by this argument, given that the > majority of patent lawsuits come from NPEs. That is not necessarily where the majority of patent lawsuit *danger* comes from, and i'd argue, pretty strongly, it's not the most likely case for LLVM. > We’d still be in the situation where a malicious contributor could: > > 1. Spin up a

Does the reason Theora is relatively safe from patent infringement lawsuit have more to do with it actually not being encumbered, or is it because its use is decentralized? For example, FreeType is not patent-free, nor is Linux, yet they succeed because on the one hand, they are open source, and those who maintain them do not guarantee anything regarding patents, it is up to each individual user

Antonio, thank you for reply. On 06/16/2015 12:22 PM, Antonio S. Martins Jr. wrote: > ----- "g" <geleem at bellsouth.net> escreveu: <<>> >> greetings, >> >> i want to sync my desktop home directory to my laptop home >> directory. i am using KDE for desktop. >> >> a problem that i foresee is the different screens between the 2.

Hi, We are in the business of developing/productizing Multimedia codecs for embedded systems. Recently, Vorbis has gained good popularity. We are also developing it. But we face few problems related to patents. Vorbis claims to be patent free. Is there any particular search made for possible patent infringements and corresponding report published? We need to convince our customers sometime

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:03 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On 3 Nov 2016, at 14:50, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > >> In particular, various corporate lawyers were worried about this > scenario that neuters defensive patents): > > Lawyers see risk everywhere, so i'll just go with "various corporate >

The list probably did not get this reply from D Richard Felker III. Having read quite a few patents I tend to agree with Richard: Software patents are very broad and even if I have not read the source code of Theora I would be surprised if it did not infringe several patents. However, I believe the argument that On2 has not been sued for infringing the MPEG-patents is a very strong argument.

I too would like to know the status of the opus IP holders. From what I've seen on the CELT and opus lists, it seems that the CELT part of opus is covered by patents from Xiph and Broadcom, and the SILK part of opus is covered by the rest. All of the IP holders except Qualcomm and Huawei have released their patents to the public as far as opus is concerned, and the general consensus from

I've dug down as far as I could on www.uspto.gov for anything remotely close to what is going on with Verizon and all searches end with only two possibilities in regards to what is going on. So unless the patent was issued to someone else and Verizon bought it, these are the only two possible patents this case could be based on... US 7,142,646 B2 Voice mail integration with instant

Hi radeonhd, nouveau, mesa3d developers, Firstly, thank you all very much for all the important work you do. I've been working as a part-time developer on the "Spring RTS" project (open-source game engine) which runs on linux (and other os). Some time ago I tried the engine on the open-source ATI radeonhd driver, which I understand to be partly based on mesa 3d, and all textures

There's a groklaw article summarizing recent discussion about the impact of the Bilski case on software patents: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20081102011538422 "The judge says this kind of cloning could be done without infringing Microsoft's copyrights, but how about its patents? Prior to Bilski, one might give one answer. Now, one might give another." If we

Hi David, Sorry for the delay getting back to you, been a bit buried: On Oct 19, 2015, at 10:12 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: >> The TL;DR version of this is that I think we should discuss relicensing all of LLVM under the Apache 2.0 license and add a runtime exception clause. See below for a lot more details. > > I agree that this is a problem.

I'm trying to get veracity (http://www.rocksoft.com/veracity/), a tripwire replacement, working on FreeBSD 5.x. When I try and create a snapshot I get the following error for files sitting on my root partition: -- snip snip -- csh.logout E: Error opening binary (B) stream of file "/etc/csh.logout". (OS error message="File is on the procfs (/proc)

> On Nov 1, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> The goals of this effort are outlined in the previous email but, in short, we aim to: >> - encourage ongoing contributions to LLVM by preserving low barrier to entry for contributors.

Hi everyone. Reading all this posts about patent issues, I thought of something: if, by some wild chance FhG (or some other audio company) manages to prove in court that vorbis is breaking their patent rights, you could do something like LAME developers did: release only source code and let people do the compiling so that only users that are living in countries where patents on algorithms are