similar to: new progress reporting ETA and resume transfer options

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=791 Summary: Progress meter ETA breaks on large files Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: scp AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: openssh at

Patrick Rael wrote: > On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <prael at lumeta.com> >> said: >> >>> Hi, >>> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for >>> CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly >>>

On 05/11/2016 11:44 AM, Patrick Rael wrote: > On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <prael at lumeta.com> >> said: >> >>> Hi, >>> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update >>> (CVE-2016-0799) for >>> CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for

Hi, Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly awaiting the same for 6.7. Thanks! -->Pat

After reading the scattered documentation and FAQs, it appears that a current release 2.2.4 Samba server can not be a BDC. Furthermore, it appears that the Samba PDC does not implement enough of a true Windows PDC to replace a Windows NT PDC as relates to NT client/server security needs. Will 3.0 Samba servers be a drop in replacement for Windows NT domain servers or can this not be

I would greatly appreciate if anybody can tell me if an R code is available for computing the eta measure of association in contingency tables. With regards --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <prael at lumeta.com> said: > Hi, > Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for > CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly > awaiting > the same for 6.7. > > Thanks! Looks like Red Hat pushed it to RHEL v6.8, released yesterday. Unless CentOS does a

On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <prael at lumeta.com> said: > >> Hi, >> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for >> CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly >> awaiting >> the same for 6.7. >> >> Thanks!

I've been looking at the --progress reporting, which is somewhat improved these days. But look at this output of this evening rawhide mirror update: [...] perl-DB_File-1.75-27.i386.rpm 73430 100% 519.63kB/s 0:00:00 perl-DB_File-1.75-28.99.3.i386.rpm 61783 100% 533.94kB/s 0:00:00 [...] Now, while it's good to have the ETA ticking down as something is fetched,

Hello, Is there some Rails 3.0.6 ETA? I am asking because there are some security holes in Rails 3.0.3, which are currently available in Fedora 15. So is it right time to update Rails to 3.0.5 or is it worth of waiting for 3.0.6? Vit -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to

hi all anyone that've heard of any working IAX hardphones yet? roy

Subject says it all... Thanks in advance, T

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2137 Bug ID: 2137 Summary: progress meter shows wrong speed during resume Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: sftp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Hi R folks (Dr. Bates in particular), In August 2005, Dr. Bates mentioned that the documentation for lme4 "will be in the form of a book with the working title 'Multilevel Modeling in R'" and I'm just wondering if there is an estimated date of publication or if it's still a long way off. The Rnews article does a great job of introducing the package, but I'm

Hi, are there any news for 3.10.12 release? Regards, -- Marco Crociani

Hi, We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the 30th of Apr instead. Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release? Thanks, Shyam On 04/06/2018 11:47 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: > Hi, > are there any news for 3.10.12 release? > > Regards, >

On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number > of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the > 30th of Apr instead. > > Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release? > Hi, yes, it's this: https://review.gluster.org/19730

On 04/09/2018 04:48 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: > On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number >> of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the >> 30th of Apr instead. >> >> Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release?

On 09/04/2018 21:36, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 04/09/2018 04:48 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: >> On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number >>> of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the >>> 30th of Apr instead.

All, To me, 6.03 is looking good. Really good!! I'm doing a presentation for a local Linux Fest, about building a lab PXE server. One topic is the new native support in pxelinux for UEFI-based PXE. As you know, previously you had to use the hybrid approach of using pxelinux.0 for BIOS boot and grub2 for UEFI boot. So you had to maintain two different boot menus with slightly different