similar to: HFS support (resource forks)

I have a feature request for rsync. I tried posting it to the FAQ-o-matic, but that system didn't seem to be accepting new questions. I hope this is an okay list for the request--apologies if it's misdirected. Mac OS X provides support for the Mac file system resource forks and mac specific metadata (e.g., creator and file type). Most Unix applications ignore this information, but it

We currently do backup using rsync amongst Linux and Solaris machines. Modulo an ACL issue that we had to patch, this is working extremely well. But I want to add our OSX machines to the mix. This is, unfortunately, leaving me confused about rsyncx. I can do the normal thing from OSX using rsync. But the page for rsyncx says - cryptically, in my ignorant opinion - that rsyncx adds support for

As you all know, rsync doesn't have any special handling for Mac OS X HFS+ resource forks. Kevin Boyd made RsyncX and rsync_hfs, to address this gap, but they only work when the destination filesystem is also HFS+. I haven't been able to find any references to an rsync that is capable of syncing from HFS+ to UFS (etc). The only solutions I've seen involve lots of preprocessing

On 1 Jun 2004, John Summerfield <john@Corridors.wa.edu.au> wrote: > The jitterbug link on http://rsync.samba.org/nobugs.html no longer works. I > suggest it either be fixed or removed. Thanks, fixed. > You make bug-reporting needlessly difficult, I think. I dislike the need to > subscribe to a mailing-list and potentially receive lots of email that > doesn't interest

Hi A friend has a disk with an hfs filesystem on it; we'd like to move it to a Debian (etch 2.6.18-6) box and share it via samba 3.0.24. I can mount the hfs disk and see the files on the linux box : good I can share a normal (xfs/etx3) fs via samba to the Mac : good Although I can share the hfs fs via samba, the extended attributes are not visible; so the existing files on the hfs

I am running a CentOS 3 server with a kernel version -2.4.21-40. I typically use Webmin to accomplish mounting varied filesystems, but this one has me buffaloed. We have a Thecus N5400 that was mounted on a Mac and a ton of data was written to it. All of the data was placed in yearly folders with content-related folders below the yearly folders. When I mount this through Webmin as an smbfs

I ran into a problem that I couldn't resolve straight away, but would like to solve for sometime in the future. We have a Thecus storage server (similar to a Buffalo TeraByte, if that helps?) that has a Mac filesystem on it. The mother board was failing, but the drives are still OK. A new box has been added, so the urgency is sort of gone. I was going to try and back up the data to a new

Hi all, I?ve got a HFS+(not journaled) volume connected to my centos6.2 test server, i installed the kmod-hfs(plus) packages and read/write works all fine. but since i?m going to use this for serving mac home folders via netatalk i would like to mount it with support for Extended Attributes and acl?s. so i add user_xattr and acl to my fstab options but then it fails to mount. checking the

I tried to install kmod-hfs and kmod-hfsplus but not found ? What is up ? the system is all updated with yum update. Jerry

I've tested all these filesystems here: http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/filesystem-metadata-overhead/ -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top -------------- next part

Respected Sir I want to know whther rsync supports resource fork on mac os x. If it doesnt is there any alternative to handle resource fork while doing remote replication between mac and other platforms. Amol Gajewar SPSOFT TECH India

I'm getting a "bad address" error which is causing my rsync process to bomb out. I'm running RsyncX 2.1, in daemon mode on the source machine, with a script to pull the information to the backup server. Both servers are Xserves running OS X Server 10.2.8. Rsync target is on an Xserve RAID. The RAID has 350GB free, so I'm not running into a disk full situation. My command

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Mgr. > Peter Tuharsky via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 20 februari 2019 10:28 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba + BIND9 DLZ. DNS dosen't resolve > FQDN, only short hostname > > Well, the mystery is solved. It WAS Avahi, in a way...

Hi Just starting out, and have read through the man and several web page tutorials, and I don?t quite understand some of the options (guess I?ll ask about those as I get to them). The first I see pretty often is ?e. Can someone explain what this does? Thanks :) All My Best, Jeffrey -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

[Now the horse has left the barn, I decided to finally implement that backup system I'd been thinking about for ages. Disk crashes can be great motivators] [Web-location for the living version of this document: http://www.lartmaker.nl/rsync/] Goal: Producing a working network backup / cloning system for Mac OS X systems. The system can be used for local backups as well, for example to

On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:03:08 +0200 "Mgr. Peter Tuharsky via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Rowland, > > > I'm following this thread because I'm trying to use Linux member > server (Debian 9) and use Windows AD users in Linux (filesystem etc). > > It seems I have working Kerberos and to a degree, Winbind too, > because both > >

I have tested the patch against 4.3.1 compiled from sources but it does not seem to work. Either I did something wrong while compiling, or the patch dosen't fix the problem. ERROR(<type 'exceptions.ValueError'>): uncaught exception - unable to parse dn string File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return

I have been trying to use rsyncx to generate a script for rotating backups but it seems to me that the --link-dest option doesn't work properly in my configuration. Instead of creating hard links for all unchanged files it seems that rsync copies everything, as if --link-dest hasn't been specificed. Can somebody clarify what's going on? My script is ptovided below: #rotating backup

Hi, I tried using rsyncX which is a GUI front end for rsync and as it turns out, the installer downgraded the current version from version 2.6.3 protocol version 28 to version 2.6.6 protocol version 27. I would like to learn more about how to get a newer version of rsync installed. Where would be a good place for a beginner to start? Thanks Much, Scott G.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10272 Summary: resource fork handling is broken in 3.1.0 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: bugzilla-samba at