similar to: rsync / rdiff in win/dos

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "rsync / rdiff in win/dos"

2004 Dec 05
0
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Updated LLVM Visual Studio project files]
Well, then why does win32/DynamicLibrary.cpp exist, not to mention it's *nix relatives? You have even been updating them, even though they cannot be compiled as they aren't included by System/DynamicLibrary.cpp. Anyway, with Morten's patches I can almost build successfully. Minor patch attached to fix the residual problems. I don't know why he didn't hit these problems.
2004 Dec 28
1
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Updated LLVM Visual Studio project files]
Hi Jeff, I'm just reviewing some old mail on my "to do" list. I was wondering if you managed to get ltdl.c to compile cleanly with VC++ or if you want me to look at these warnings. Reid. On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 09:08, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Well, then why does win32/DynamicLibrary.cpp exist, not to mention it's > *nix relatives? You have even been updating them, even though
2005 Jul 08
1
Compiling icecast on windows?
Hi, Thanks for the reply, I got the dependancies but with no lucl :( Its just error after error. Does anyone on the list have experience with compiling on windows? Does anyone have a compiled version icecast-2.2-kh12d? Should I just give up and wait for the next official release? :( Heres the errors I get now: ------ Build started: Project: icecast, Configuration: Release Win32 ------
2002 Apr 24
1
[rproxy-devel] rdiff deltas not very good compared to pysync, why?
On 24 Apr 2002, "Shirish H. Phatak" <shirish@tacitnetworks.com> wrote: > Since there appears to be a dedicated group of users and lots of > activity, maybe we can convince Martin to roll in these patches and make > a new release? I have been really lax in supporting librsync for the last few months, because of a new job and taking over maintenance of rsync
2008 Jun 20
1
problem with rdiff
Hi all. (I am sending this querry here because it is somehow relating to rsync. If i am wrong please pardon me.) I am doing following on these windowsXP and Vista. I am trying to get only incremental backup using "rdiff-backup" (that also uses rsync). I have installed gcc compiler and by following the steps given in http://katastrophos.net/andre/blog/2005/11/02/rdiff-backup-on-windows/
2004 Dec 04
3
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Updated LLVM Visual Studio project files]
ltdl.h fully supports windows platforms (lots of them). That isn't the issue. The issue is setting up the #defines to reflect the windows system. e.g. HAVE_DLOPEN needs to be false Reid. On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 20:35, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > > It will have to be Morten. I can't get ltdl.c to compile. But wasn't > > the
2002 Aug 04
1
MD4 bug in rsync for lengths = 64 * n
I am the author of BackupPC (http://backuppc.sourceforge.net) and I am working on adding rsync support to BackupPC. I am implementing the server-side in perl, and the client will run vanilla rsync. (BTW, is there the protocol documented? I've answered all my questions by looking at the source, but it would be great to check against any docs.) I started with librsync 0.9.3 and the
2003 Mar 01
0
librsync [Solved]
I found the cvs repository at = http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/librsync/librsync/ The sourceforge project was just setup a couple of days ago. That must have = been why google could not find it yesterday. I believe the samba cvs site for librsync is now deprecated. The 0.9.5.1 version I was looking for looks to me to be a Jun. 27 cvs snapshot = from wherever cvs was at that
2003 Jun 12
1
questions about librsync
I'm not sure if this is the appropriate forum for questions regarding librsync, but couldn't find any others. I'm trying to get librsync working properly on Solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Sparc servers. The problem is that while librsync appears to compile cleanly, "make check" fails the sources.test. Does anyone have any insight as to why this might be? Might I need a specific
2004 Apr 08
2
[librsync-devel] librsync and rsync vulnerability to maliciously crafted data. was Re: MD4 checksum_seed
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 12:36, Martin Pool wrote: > On 5 Apr 2004, Donovan Baarda <abo@minkirri.apana.org.au> wrote: > > > librsync needs a whole file checksum. Without it, it silently fails for > > case 1), 3), and 4). > > Yes, a whole-file checksum should be used with it. Presumably > something stronger than md4 like SHA-1. md4 is probably good enough for most
2003 Apr 17
0
rsync - windows how should I compile the code any clues -Thanks !
Hi Donovan, Thank you for the insight. I will keep you posted on this. Best Regards Naveen A. >From: Donovan Baarda <abo@minkirri.apana.org.au> >To: Naveen Athresh <naveenathresh@hotmail.com> >CC: rsync@samba.org,librsync developers list ><librsync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >Subject: Re: rsync - windows how should I compile the code any clues >-Thanks
2017 May 10
1
[Bug 12781] New: rsync library
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12781 Bug ID: 12781 Summary: rsync library Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: ildar at altlinux.ru
2002 Jun 21
2
Release 3 of "rzync" new-protocol test
For anyone who'd like to check out the latest release of my "rzync" [sic] test release, I've just released a new version. For those that might not have time to look at the code but could provide some feedback based on a rough description, I've created the following simple web page: http://www.clari.net/~wayne/new-protocol.html Here's the tar file of the new
2005 Sep 30
2
question about librsync : patch function
Hello everybody, About librsync, does anyone know how to patch the delta without creating a new file ? I used the librsync and it always generates a new file, which is embarrassing if the file is over 1Gb. I tried to store the new file in RAM, but it saturates the machine. Is there a possibility to write in the current file to be synchronized, although this file is currently being
2003 Jun 08
2
state of the rsync nation? (revisited 6/2003 from 11/2000)
I'm interested in these very questions (librsync-rsync relationship, remaining limitations of rsync, active prospects for ground-up rewrites), Google searches for rsync info have proved a little too vague due to the programs ubiquity. Much has certainly changed since this was written, could some people with knowledge in these areas could update martin's response for the state of rsync,
2009 May 14
1
(no subject)
Hi, Vista Visual Studio 2008 This has popped up on my Vista box with a fresh download of ruby-1.8.6-p114: pack.c(1926) : warning C4018: ''>'' : signed/unsigned mismatch byacc ./parse.y ''byacc'' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. NMAKE : fatal error U1077: ''byacc'' : return code
2001 Sep 14
0
librsync 0.9.5 released
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 librsync 0.9.5 is released from rproxy.samba.org. This release contains small but important bug fixes. Changes in 0.9.5: * Bugfix patch from Shirish Hemant Phatak MD5 checksum: df1c35520e4b0bf9d6d7ac813ba86a14 *librsync-0.9.5.tar.gz - -- Martin Pool -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see
2016 Jan 23
0
LGPL relicense port of rsync
Hi, from my point of view: On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:48:09 +0100 Per Lundqvist <perlundq at gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > Getting the approval for a relicensing I think the contributions to > > rsync have to be analyzed in detail to approach a reasonable number of > > contributors. > > > > I experienced that finding a responsible person that is willing to >
2009 Feb 27
1
rsync --files-from
Hi, I am working on a replication tool for lustre filesystems. We have introduced a mechanism for getting the changes that have been made to a lustre filesystem - similar to inotify. We call this mechanism, changelogs. For performing replication, we open the source file using its 'file identifier' or FID (think of it an inode that is unique cluster wide) instead of its path. The file is
2010 May 20
10
Libtheora
Hi all, I am Sahana. I am currently working on Libtheora for windows platform and very new to it. I am getting a lot of compiling errors. Since Libtheora depends on libogg and libvorbis i have added these as well to my workspace in VC++ 6. I have a doubt regarding the x86 and x86_vc folders described in the libtheora software.Since both these folders have the same set of files which one do we