similar to: Suggested fix for --backup not logging 'deleted' files

The attached patch makes two changes to the behavior of the -v option: 1) The initial "building file list ... done" and the last two lines with transfer statistics are moved to verbose level 2, which means that you have to specify -vv to see them. When I use -v, I only want to see which files are being updated. Perhaps the statistics could be controlled by a separate option,

From: Karanbir Singh <Mail-Lists at karan.org> > Which is a good thing really, since you can snip off the irrelevant bits > on your way down. Yes, I do it. But in my case, I've got to manually cut'n paste and add the greater-than signs. It gets tedious (especially on my Treo). But I do it because I believe in bottom-posting. > Gmail works fine. It sets the In-Reply-To:

Hi, I think lit.py’s current behavior is somewhat unintuitive in the presence of -v (and not using -vv), so I’m proposing that it be changed. Current behavior: -v: Prints all the substituted lines, not clear which line failed :( -vv: Prints all the lines up to and including the line that failed :) Option 1: -v: Prints only the failing line :) -vv: Same as today. :) -vvv (new): Prints all the

Hi, I'm using rsync version 2.5.5 on OpenBSD 3.3 to backup the users /home directory over the Internet. It's started by a cron job every night. For logging I've add the -vv parameter and redirect the output to a logfile. Like this: rsync -vv --stats --archive --delete --backup --backup-dir=/home/backupdir --compress --rsh 'ssh -2 -i keyfile.key' /home

This is not a new bug as I found the behaviour on many version of rsync . When you use the --delete option combined with --backup, the expected behaviour is to backup the deleted file on target machine by renaming it with the backup suffix or with ~ suffix by default. This works fine but when you execute the same command a second time, like my cron job does the next day, the backup file gets

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2675 ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-05-02 09:37 ------- Created an attachment (id=1202) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1202&action=view) Fix the combination of --backup with --delete-after -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail

Hi, A user accidentally delete a folder from their Maildir (probably while using Thunderbird). The folder was at Archives/Sent/2015 (/.Archives.Sent.2015 in the Maildir format). I attempted to copy the folder from a tar backup into the Maildir folder but the new folder does not show up in Thunderbird or in the Subscribe option. I also copied the .Archives.Sent. folder as well. A

I am missing a option for --backup By default --backup copies deleted and changed files. With patching rsync I can specify a dir for the deleted files and a dir for the changed files. My problem is that I don't care abotu changed files/dirs. Only deleted files/dirs are interesting. Is there any workaround or option that I can use to only backup deleted files/dirs? Telling --backup-dir to use

People, I have command for backing up to a backup dir (eg /home/backup/prix/) with: rsync -av --delete --link-dest /home/backup/prix/${1}_0_hard_link /$1/ /home/backup/prix/${1}_$dt/ for example the etc dir - which creates the following in the backup dir: etc etc_0_hard_link etc_20230416_165232 - having previously created a hard-linked clone of the previously existing backup

Hi, I use the options --backup and --backup-dir (in combination with --delete) to backup changed or deleted files. And for each rsync I use a different backup-dir so I keep all the deleted/changed files. Now I have some big files (> 50GB) that change every day but I only need one last version on my destination server. I want to have these files synced, but I don't want to have a --backup

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7889 Summary: Add "--backup-deleted" Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: jik at kamens.brookline.ma.us

Hello.. I'm attempting to copy/sync a development directory on my laptop to our web server, and for some reason dot-files are being copied but not deleted. Command line: rsync -rvva --delete-after -e ssh ./ server.com:/var/www/html/project/ The symptom is that I've got files like '.Makefile.swp' and '.hidden.php.swp' on the server (vi temp files) even after deleting them

It would be nice if there were a flag which would have rsync behave like a single -v but which would skip the two line summary info. I do a lot of cron-based transfers and I want to see what gets transferred if anything does, but I'd like it to be entirely silent otherwise. Here is a patch which makes a single -v behave this way. -vv causes it to include the extra info. diff -r -X

Thanks for looking at this, and developing rsync. Really useful program that I rely on. Bit of a newbie but I couldn't find anything on this in these archives. Hopefully it's a really stupid question! I'm trying to backup using cp -al and then rsync -auR --delete backup idea basically as per http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/#Incremental. I have a separate

Chiming in late on this thread... > > | Are there any packages which > > | would break if a call to 'tempdir' automatically recreated this > > | directory? (Or would it be too much of a performance hit to have > > | 'tempdir' check and even just issue a warning when the directory is > > | found not to exist?) > >

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2676 Summary: Directory replaced by a single file cannot be deleted Product: rsync Version: 2.5.7 Platform: All URL: http://www.adelard.co.uk/info/staff/pbishop.htm OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core

>>>>> Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> >>>>> on Sun, 23 Apr 2017 09:15:18 -0500 writes: > On 21 April 2017 at 10:34, frederik at ofb.net wrote: > | Hi Mikko, > | > | I was bitten by this recently and I think some of the replies are > | missing the point. As I understand it, the problem consists of these > |

Hi there, I'm using this version of rsync: localhost:~ mzehetle$ /usr/local/bin/rsync --version rsync version 2.6.0 protocol version 27 Copyright (C) 1996-2004 by Andrew Tridgell and others HFS+ filesystem support for OSX (C)2004 Kevin A. Boyd <http://rsync.samba.org/> Basically incremental backup (--link-dest option) works with a destination on my local volume but not with a

I have installed rsync on my PC (NT) and a windows 2000 server. It appears the 2 boxes are unable to talk. I get following errors: C:\Program Files\rsync>rsync.exe -vv test\* 172.17.13.31:C:\test opening connection using rsh 172.17.13.31 rsync --server -vv . "C:\test" > 172.17.13.31:Connection refused rsh.exe: can't establish connection rsync: read error: Connection reset

Tim Northover via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > Hi Varun, > > I'm definitely in favour of making -v more useful like this. > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 19:31, Varun Gandhi via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Option 2 (less deviation from status quo): >> -v: Adopts behavior of -vvv from Option 1. :) >> -vv: Same