similar to: Dump Analysis -- when NCR server frozen by rsync

I have been trying to analyse an unreplicated repeated measures 2-level factorial design with 11 factors using aov() with Error(), similar to that described in "Notes on the use of R for psychology experiments and questionnaires" by Jonathan Baron and Yuelin Li (see the example of Hay's) I have found that there seems to be a limit, in the number of factors in Error() . For

I forgot to mention that this analysis was carried out using the Windows version . Perhaps this problem is windows specific. Peter Peter Ho wrote: > Prof. Ripley, > > I am sending this to you again, as the first one was undelivered. > > > Peter > > ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk wrote: > > >>> There is no intended limit, but there was a bug fix in 1.5.0. If

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Ankireddypalle Reddy <areddy at commvault.com> wrote: > 3.7.19 > These are the only callers for removexattr and only _posix_remove_xattr has the potential to do removexattr as posix_removexattr already makes sure that it is not gfid/volume-id. And surprise surprise _posix_remove_xattr happens only from healing code of afr/ec. And this can only happen

Hello Gurus, Greetings. I have been assigned some work on the development of a migration tool. The requirement is that it has to migrate the data on a UFS/VxFs filesystem to an ext2 filesystem. What are the technical apects I will have to look into to achieve the same? Is it possible to change the on-disk structure of the UFS/VxFs filesystem to an ext2 filesystem? The question may

We lost the attributes on all the bricks on servers glusterfs2 and glusterfs3 again. [root at glusterfs2 Log_Files]# gluster volume info Volume Name: StoragePool Type: Distributed-Disperse Volume ID: 149e976f-4e21-451c-bf0f-f5691208531f Status: Started Number of Bricks: 20 x (2 + 1) = 60 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: glusterfs1sds:/ws/disk1/ws_brick Brick2: glusterfs2sds:/ws/disk1/ws_brick

Hi, when I am connecting to samba, openingor saving a MS Word document, nearly every time there is a core-file. In the log-file there I found following message: [2002/08/12 15:13:44, 0] lib/util_sec.c:assert_gid(111) Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-24) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0) [2002/08/12 15:13:44, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1064) PANIC: failed to set gid What does it mean? The

Ram, As per the code, self-heal was the only candidate which *can* do it. Could you check logs of self-heal daemon and the mount to check if there are any metadata heals on root? +Sanoj Sanoj, Is there any systemtap script we can use to detect which process is removing these xattrs? On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Ankireddypalle Reddy <areddy at commvault.com> wrote: >

HI, The question is a ZFS performance question in reguards to SAN traffic. We are trying to benchmark ZFS vx VxFS file systems and I get the following performance results. Test Setup: Solaris 10: 11/06 Dual port Qlogic HBA with SFCSM (for ZFS) and DMP (of VxFS) Sun Fire v490 server LSI Raid 3994 on backend ZFS Record Size: 128KB (default) VxFS Block Size: 8KB(default) The only thing

Hi - a question for all ye rsync guru's out there... I have a need to migrate some fairly large Oracle datafiles from a UFS filesystem to VxFS (VERITAS), however I am not being allowed nearly enough outage time to perform a standard file copy migration. The datafiles (of which there are about 4 are about 50GB each in size and on separate UFS filesystems. I am considering instigating a local

Please use the systemtap script( https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/EGDa0ErwX0LV3y-gBYpfNA) to check which process is invoking remove xattr calls. It prints the pid, tid and arguments of all removexattr calls. I have checked for these fops at the protocol/client and posix translators. To run the script .. 1) install systemtap and dependencies. 2) install glusterfs-debuginfo 3) change the path

Is it possible to use DTrace to display the number of arguments and their types for userland or kernel functions that are not explicitly instrumented or documented by their authors? We''re talking about functions provided by Veritas VxVM/VxFS and the like, and for example, we might want to try tracing I/Os from App => VxFS => VxVM => ssd driver to see where I/Os get aggregated or

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Damjan Perenic<damjan.perenic at guest.arnes.si> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Richard > Elling<richard.elling at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Aug 11, 2009, at 7:39 AM, Ed Spencer wrote: >> >>> I suspect that if we ''rsync'' one of these filesystems to a second >>> server/pool ?that we would

Has anyone had any experience with samba on a Solaris 2.6 system using vxfs file system?

Thanks for the swift turn around. Will try this out and let you know. Thanks and Regards, Ram From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:31 AM To: Sanoj Unnikrishnan Cc: Ankireddypalle Reddy; Gluster Devel (gluster-devel at gluster.org); gluster-users at gluster.org Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost Ram,

@ pranith , yes . we can get the pid on all removexattr call and also print the backtrace of the glusterfsd process when trigerring removing xattr. I will write the script and reply back. On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu at redhat.com > wrote: > Ram, > As per the code, self-heal was the only candidate which *can* do > it. Could you check

Hello experts, We have a large implementation of Symantec Netbackup 6.0 with disk staging. Today, the customer is using VxFS as file system inside Netbackup 6.0 DSSU (disk staging). The customer would like to know if it is best to use ZFS or VxFS as file system inside Netbackup disk staging in order to get the best performance possible. Could you provide some information regarding this

We are looking at the alternatives to VXVM/VXFS. One of the feature which we liked in Veritas, apart from the obvious ones is the ability to call the disks by name and group them in to a disk group. Especially in SAN based environment where the disks may be shared by multiple machines, it is very easy to manage them by disk group names rather than cxtxdx numbers. Does zfs offer such

Hi Folks.. We have started to convert our Veritas clustered systems over to ZFS root to take advantage of the extreme simplification of using Live Upgrade. Moving the data of these systems off VxVM and VxFS is not in scope for reasons to numerous to go into.. One thing my customers noticed immediately was a reduction in "free" memory as reported by ''top''. By way

Hi, sorry if I am brining up old news, but I couldn''t find a good answer searching the previous posts (My mom always says I am bad with finding things :) However I noticed a difference when creating a zfs filesystem compared with a vxfs filesystem in the available size. ie. ZFS zonedata/zfs [b]392G[/b] 120G 272G 31% /zfs VxFS /dev/vx/dsk/zonedg/zonevol

Ram, If you see it again, you can use this. I am going to send out a patch for the code path which can lead to removal of gfid/volume-id tomorrow. On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Sanoj Unnikrishnan <sunnikri at redhat.com> wrote: > Please use the systemtap script(https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/ > EGDa0ErwX0LV3y-gBYpfNA) to check which process is invoking remove xattr