similar to: [Bug 3117] New: rsyncing a file to a partially downloaded copy is extremely slow

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3117 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-10-17 10:56

Hello, I am trying to rsync a tree containing very large files. The first one encountered is a file that is 127 GB on the remote (authorative) end and around 80 GB on the receiving end. rsync version is 2.6.2, patched to fix the bug mentioned at: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1529 But even so transfer is extremely slow towards the end. It will sync approximately (or exactly,

> Hi, I probably can't help. The only time I had rsync Hi, thanks anyway for trying. > suggest is that your network bandwidth is being used up > by something else (whatever is using up that 4MB/s) but Chances are low because this value appears exactly when I launch the rsyncing. > be another 8MB/s to spare. Wireshark could help you > identify what the traffic is. Not sure

Hello All, We've been running Dovecot for imap for quite some time and have had little trouble with it. However, we recently switched over to using dovecot for pop3 because of simplicity as well as security issues with the older UW based pop server. I've noticed one serious problem. The only client that seems to have any issue at all with the server is Evolution. In pop3 mode, it takes a

I have been trying to download the latest version to my Macbook X version 10.6.8 from my institutions mirror http://cran.cnr.Berkeley.edu Usually is only takes minutes, but regardless of the browser or where I connect to the internet I have been unable to download because it would take upwards 2 days according to the download dialogue box. I'd really like to get the newest version to run some

Hi all, I am trying to get to the bottom of a strange rsync performance problem. On a specific guest OS, and only on this guest OS, rsync is giving modem-like transfer speeds. This happens on delta transfers, and whole file transfers. [root at arnie ~]# rsync -avz --progress --sparse arnie.example.com:/home/backup/example/cuttysark.example.com/var-lib-libvirt-images-snapshot/

Hello, I have a data.frame with the following format: > head(clin2) Study Subject Type Obs Cycle Day Date Time 1 A001101 10108 ALB 44.00000 98 1 2004-03-11 14:26 2 A001101 10108 ALP 95.00000 98 1 2004-03-11 14:26 3 A001101 10108 ALT 61.00000 98 1 2004-03-11 14:26 5 A001101 10108 AST 33.00000 98 1 2004-03-11 14:26 I want to transform this

Hi, I have a problem with rsyncing large data sets (consisting bunch of small files) over ssh. rsync 2.6.6 on both sides. Linux 2.6.10 on receiving side, 2.6.12.6 on sending side. This strace is from rsyncing over 2Mbit link but I can repeat it over 100Mbps lan, too (while testing on lan 2.6.11.3 was on sending and 2.6.12.6 on receiving side). I wonder what can be problem here? Some

I've been working to migrate several hundered users on to our new mail servers, which run dovecot 0.99.11 (RHEL4). The problem I'm seeing is that deleting or moving a message seems to take a very long time. It's not uncommon for Thundirbird (1.0.7) to have delays of 5-10 seconds to delete a single message from my Inbox (<500k) and place it in my Trash folder (~100MB right

I've this error How i can find the problem? Apr 23 12:24:43 WARNING[131081]: PRI: received TEI check request for TEI = 89 Apr 23 12:24:47 WARNING[131081]: PRI: received TEI check request for TEI = 89 Apr 23 12:24:48 WARNING[131081]: PRI: !! Got a UA, but i'm in state 1 Apr 23 12:24:53 WARNING[131081]: PRI: received TEI check request for TEI = 89 Apr 23 12:25:02 WARNING[131081]: PRI:

Pacific General (1997), a direct X 3 game, runs extremely slow on my modern hardware under Ubuntu 7.10 with either an NVIDIA 8800GT or ATI X800GTO. It obviously is not my system as the bottleneck. The entire game runs, however it is extremely slow when moving the mouse over any units, or when clicking on any units. This could be sound related, or MouseOver API related, or both. My sound works

Hi there, After an upgrade our fileservers to samba 4.2.10 (debian package), some (but no all) of our XP and Seven boxes are extremely slow. Toggling "require strong key" to no does not help. Our DC are still 4.1.17 (debian package) Is there any known issue? Regards

Hi, I'm backing up contents of my GOBook(http://sascoet.mutu.fdn.fr/monalbum/albums/sa-12082010fujitsugigamos2300scsifleury-les-aubraisrecusdemonsauveurcomputermagneticsdmc-lx2/sa-1208201012h39fujitsugigamo2300scsiconnecteagobookfleury-les-aubraisrecusdemonsauveurcomputermagneticsdmc-lx2.jpg) before it dies completely on a dell laptop via my LAN(netstat indicates a 11.8MB/s speed between

F27AE.9000301 at free.fr> Stephane Ascoet via rsync wrote: > Hi, I'm backing up contents of my GOBook(http://sascoet.mutu.fdn.fr/monalbum/albums/sa-12082010fujitsugigamos2300scsifleury-les-aubraisrecusdemonsauveurcomputermagneticsdmc-lx2/sa-1208201012h39fujitsugigamo2300scsiconnecteagobookfleury-les-aubraisrecusdemonsauveurcomputermagneticsdmc-lx2.jpg) > before it dies completely on

Counter-Strike 1.6 is extremely slow for me, say, one frame per ten seconds. I am running Wine on Arch Linux 64 bits, I created my Wine prefix using Code: WINEARCH=win32 winecfg This is my direct rendering log: Code: trace:wgl:X11DRV_WineGL_InitOpenglInfo GL version : 2.1 Mesa 7.11.2. trace:wgl:X11DRV_WineGL_InitOpenglInfo GL renderer : Mesa DRI Intel(R) 965GME/GLE

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51862 Bug #: 51862 Summary: Shader optimizer is extremely slow Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: medium Component:

Hello all, We are facing extremely slow GFS2 issues in Redhat 7 64 bit. Backend is 16 Gbps FC SAN so no issues there. I have scoured the entire (anyways most of the) Internet and arrived at the following settings. mmap_disable = yes mail_fsync = always mail_nfs_storage = yes mail_nfs_index = yes mmap_disable = yes lock_method = fcntl Did a systemctl restart dovecot and did not find any major

Hello to all, I am meanwhile with the latest samba sernet 3.5.8 but it is still the same. When I place a executable exe-file in a share for all users the responding and starting of that application is extremely slow. As I can tell the cut was from samba2 to samba3 that those things happen. Is there a work around to speed things up? ----------------------------------------------- EDV Daniel

On 28-01-2015 11:15, Patrick Bervoets wrote: > I have a C6 server acting as a kvm-host. > > When connecting with ssh the console is extremely slow and hangs for > minutes at a time. Connecting to this server is not the problem. > > If I use: ssh root at host "whatever" I got immediate response even when > interactive consoles opened with ssh are hanging. Sorry, is

Hi Patrick have you ever tried to find out on which side the hanger is: on the client's or on the server's, using tcpumg or the like? That migth help a bit further on, that might. suomi On 01/28/2015 05:41 PM, Patrick Bervoets wrote: > Op 28-01-15 om 17:20 schreef Marcelo Ricardo Leitner: >> On 28-01-2015 11:15, Patrick Bervoets wrote: >>> I have a C6 server acting as