similar to: Network/bridge questions

Gao feng @ 12/11/2013 01:49 AM: > I have a machine running libvirt lxc, > on this machine(host), the network configure looks like this > eth0 is the physical nic, virbr0 is the bridge libvirt created, and vnet0 > is the veth device created for libvirt lxc container. you can see, the eth0 > is a port of virbr0, and the ip is assigned on virbr0. > > [snip] > > And in

Hey, I have KVM installed on my Fedora 17 box. I added the network interfaces of the virtual machines to the openvswitch bridge as follows: ____ ____ / VM1\______br0_______/ em1\ \____/ | \____/ | _|_ /VM2\ \____/ virbr0 is the virtual network switch VM1 and VM2 are on the same subnet having tap interfaces vnet0 and vnet1 respectively. em1 is the default

This is my system info: Debian Release: 10.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.4.60-1-pve (SMP w/16 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh

hello all, I have been trying to set-up bridged network with VLAN and not able to succeed as many tutorials address only single NIC. I am trying to setup 2 guests (backtrack instance) each guest has NIC1 and NIC2. following is snippet for guest1 I am not able to get 192.168.0.2 address back on guest eth0. VIRT-MANAGER GUI : guest1-lan details radio button left side panel NIC1

inquiry about differences between the tap and the vnet in the virt-manager Greetings! I encounter a problem about the network when using virt-manager to create and run a VM. when I want to establish a network bridge for the guest OS, I generally use two kinds of ways described as fellow : First method : create a bridge with the help of linux commad: brctl, or Second method : using

someone recommended that i should give br0 the same hardware address as eno2. I did that, and restarted the vm, and it still does not work. Here is my current host interface config: ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft

hello i have a server colocated in a datacenter with several external IP addresses available to use. the physical server is using one of these IPs, and i want to assign another, unused IP to the virtual machine. i thought i could just do this by editing the container's /etc/network/interfaces, setting a static IP address for eth0 much like i did for br0 on the host machine.... but doesn't

Hi, I have a fc14 box with two interfaces that I'm having some difficulty setting up a bridge properly. I have a few kvm guests set up and running, but I've switched from using NetworkManager to using standard networking with a bridge. I've modified the ifcfg-eth0 and created ifcfg-br0 as per the standard documentation, but I think I'm having routing problems. This is what the

Hello guys, maybe you can help me with following issue. I have created a little cloud with a host and two worker nodes using opennebula. The setup went successfully until now, I am able to create VM's and move them via normal and live migration. Another (possibly) important information is that I configured my virtual bridge on both worker nodes like this: auto br0 iface br0 inet static

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Gao feng @ 12/12/2013 10:18 PM: > I saw there are two bridge br0 and virbr0 in your host. which > bridge the libvirt uses? what's result of #virsh net-list ? well i don't quite understand bridges and their function, i'm kinda just following directions. br0 replaced eth0 though in my interfaces file according to this guide[1] i

Hello: I have a host running two KVM guests. The guests use br0 and each has a static IP address. I am trying to figure out if there is a way to use snmpd on the host to measure the traffic usage of the guests. I do not want to require anything running on the guests since I do not control them. Looking at netstat -in on the host, I see this info: Kernel Interface table Iface MTU Met

----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "Andrew Holway" <a.holway at syseleven.de> To: "Alex Jia" <ajia at redhat.com> Cc: kvm at vger.kernel.org Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 4:24:33 PM Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] vm pxe fail Hello, On Aug 17, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Alex Jia wrote: > Hi Andrew, > I can't confirm a root reason based on your information, perhaps

I am running NOX controller with a python script that prints out the destination mac and the source mac for each packet arriving at the now controller and then floods it out. So here's what happening: With em1 connected, all the packets that arrive at em1 are coming to the controller and printing out the details. However, without em1 connected to the OVS, when I have the following setup:

Hi list! I would like to modernize my server at home which is still running Shorewall 3. The server will be running CentOS 6.2 but i also want to use KVM virtualization to run a Windows host on the same box that i can log in to remotely. I looked through the documentation samples on the shorewall site and found several bridging configurations but they do not match my setup, yes it will

I have shifted some VM's to a new server running Quantal and have had a world of trouble. The first one was caused by issues with an apparently compiled in path in their apparmor version which forced VM pools to be in /srv or similar rather than where I wanted them. For now this was not a big issue, and thankfully the server where it would be a big time problem (there are individual drives per

Hi All, I'm playing with KVM in order to adopt the technology for dev / testing purposes. Installing RHEL5 from ISO images works ok, no problems with installation. The problem occurs with PXE boot - it is simply doesn't try to do PXE boot, according to what I can see: Booting from Hard Disk... Boot from Hard Disk failed: not a bootable disk FATAL: No bootable device. _ I have: CentOS

host and guest both centos 5.5 network is 192.168.62.40 host is setup as follows [root at cloud2 ~]# ifconfig br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1A:64:12:10:D9 inet addr:192.168.62.199 Bcast:192.168.63.255 Mask:255.255.254.0 inet6 addr: fe80::21a:64ff:fe12:10d9/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1705488

I need to use an existing windows 7 installation in a virtual machine form a libvirt host running Ubuntu 12.10. Windows 7 installs on two partitions. There a 100MB boot partitiona and then the main partition for the installation. If I boot the laptop (which dual boots), I can select Windows 7 and boot it just fine, or alternative Ubuntu. If I select /dev/sda1 in the virtmanager as the source

I have installed OVS from sources using the installation steps mentioned on this link: http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/intro/install/general/ I had installed libvrt, KVM, QEMU and all the necessary packages using apt-get. My KVM-QEMU hypervisor has been running well. To add a VM with the port attached to OVS bridge I changed the XML domain file as per the instructions on this page:

I am running KVM virtualization with libvirtd (libvirt) 0.10.2 in bridged network mode, however I still have the default virtual network bridge/interfaces and dnsmasq on the host. What I am trying to understand is whether or not dnsmasq and the virtual network (*virbr0, Vnet0 and Vnet1*) still play any role. If not, can I remove them? On most virtual hosts I see they are left around even when a