similar to: regression, troubles with setup git tree

> git reset --hard Thanks, it's works and very useful! Now, how i, after some 'git bisect's, can i see where is set git tree currently precisely? I study many git manuals but found nothing so only way i have is compile current git and run 'wine --version'. Is there more faster way / git command exist? Also can I switch my git tree precisely one step forward and backward?

Hi! I probably found regression in Wine. The problem is i don't know last stable release name (tag, version number) of Wine which don't have this regression. I carefully read about regressions here http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting Here i see a way to setup git tree somewhere between stable versions. It can be useful if i exactly know two adjacent (neighbour) stable version numbers

Just to prove it, I replied to my own message...AND sent it to myself. What a day... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Wine] Errors running BiblePro and BibleStudyPro on today's Git Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:07:43 -0700 From: James McKenzie <jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net> To: James Mckenzie <jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net> References:

jpka <wineforum-user at winehq.org> wrote: > >Hi! I also need regression testing. Sadly, while try to install wine into my Ubuntu 10.10, for some old versions of Wine >like wine-1.0, i get errors like > There is a major problem here. If a program works with Wine 1.0.1 but does not with Wine 1.2.2, there are about 3500 changes to the code. It would be better if a more current

On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 00:35, Bruce Hoult <brucehoult at sifive.com> wrote: > Yes, I'd expect only a tiny fraction of commits to change the interface between say, clang and llvm in an incompatible way, but where they do it's essential to get both sides at the same time if you want to to have every commit buildable for things such as bisection or incremental rebasing (as I think

List: I have no familarity with this program. The following is from Bob. I have also asked Bob to install this program using the installation media provided by the producer of this program. Anyone else want to interceed and assist Bob with this problem? Thank you. James McKenzie -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Deleting .wine as root Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:58:35 -0400

Forwarding to the list. Anyone experienced this? James McKenzie -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Regsvr32 running through Gecko Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:06:55 -0700 (GMT-07:00) From: James Mckenzie <jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net> Reply-To: James Mckenzie <jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net> To: Jacek Caban <jacek at codeweavers.com> Jacek Caban<jacek at

>From: Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> >Sent: Jan 13, 2009 7:17 PM >To: James McKenzie <jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net> >Subject: Re: meaning of "Hardware" field in bugzilla? > >On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:15 PM, James McKenzie ><jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net> wrote: >> Austin English wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 13,

Schuttwegraeumer <wineforum-user at winehq.org> wrote: >Sent: Aug 3, 2010 11:21 AM >To: wine-users at winehq.org >Subject: [Wine] Re: How to fix the SSL/https problem? > >Is that usefull?: If you want us to tell you that you are doing this right, yes. For location of errors, no. > > >> schutti at hell:~/Desktop/X/WINE/wine-git$ git bisect start >> schutti

jallp82 <wineforum-user at winehq.org> >Sent: Feb 5, 2009 12:45 AM >To: wine-users at winehq.org >Subject: [Wine] Can't Open "C:\" Drive > >I am using Xubuntu 8.04 64bit. When I click the link to view the "C:\" drive it gives me error "The URL "~/.wine/drive_c" is not supported." I'm trying to uninstall my attempted install of

Bob <benjie1 at cox.net> wrote: >Sent: Jul 28, 2010 4:32 PM >To: James Mckenzie <jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net> >Subject: Deleting .wine as root > >Hi James. Not sure how to delete .wine as root. I have to cd to >/home/benjie1 and the .wine is there. > >Can I delete it using yum in fedora? > No, yum is a package manager. You would delete the Wine

Doh123, how is running a program off an NTFS partition asking for trouble? Ntfsprogs seems to handle it just fine. I know that NTFS doesn't let you mark a file as executable, and that the filesystem is susceptible to fragmentation, but you should just be able to tell it to run rather than display and be good. It shouldn't cause destruction. I think there might even be an NTFS defrag tool

To the list.... -----Forwarded Message----- >From: James Mckenzie <jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net> >Sent: Jul 28, 2010 11:43 AM >To: Bob <benjie1 at cox.net> >Subject: Re: [Wine] Hardwood Solitaire and Wine 1.2-rc7 >-----Original Message----- >>From: Bob <benjie1 at cox.net> >>Sent: Jul 28, 2010 1:43 PM >>To: James Mckenzie <jjmckenzie51 at

Forwarding to list. One of my concerns is that we don't direct users to scan the forum entries before they post. This is just one example of 'me too' messages in a series. And the maddening thing is that folks like Jim below, don't have the problem. Several 'fixes' have been posted to work around what originally appears to be brokenness in Wine, starting about 1.1.44,

OK, so what is the answer to jsmith's question? On 6/22/08 wine-users-request at winehq.org wrote: > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:22:59 -0700 > From: James McKenzie <jjmckenzie51 at sprintpcs.com> > Subject: Re: [Wine] Wine on Windows XP > To: Michael Reich <reich.mikey at gmail.com> > Cc: wine-users at winehq.org > Message-ID: <485EFAF3.8010907

> On Jun 30, 2016, at 1:26 AM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 30 June 2016 at 05:14, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: >>> That makes it fragile, and that’s why I disagree with your “90% done” assessment. >>> What if the service behing the hook is down for a few days? >> >> In the long-term

On 30 June 2016 at 05:14, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: >> That makes it fragile, and that’s why I disagree with your “90% done” assessment. >> What if the service behing the hook is down for a few days? > > In the long-term view, a pretty trivial catch-up script ought to be > able to synthesize a sane history after any amount of down-time. >

> That makes it fragile, and that’s why I disagree with your “90% done” assessment. > What if the service behing the hook is down for a few days? In the long-term view, a pretty trivial catch-up script ought to be able to synthesize a sane history after any amount of down-time. People could even run it locally for their bisecting needs if it was that important to them. In the short term, I

"bit of trouble" - good pun! But I do hope it gets solved. Can you make a bash file (oh no - a pun of my own!) to automate any of those annoyances? Would putting the game "in its own WINE" help at all? Cheers, Jake On May 3, 2011, at 3:18 AM, wine-users-request at winehq.org wrote: > Send wine-users mailing list submissions to > wine-users at winehq.org > >

>Jim Hall at Aug 11, 2009 8:44 AM wrote to James McKenzie: > >On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:25 PM, James McKenzie ><jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net>wrote: > >> Jim Hall wrote: >> > Debian Lenny, latest Wine. >> > >> > I just installed a program that my WOW guild is raving about. Had to >> install >> > .NET 2 to get it to run. Only