Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100000 matches similar to: "No subject"
2013 Jul 11
1
(no subject)
>From the documentation, virtual users seem like a good idea if you plan on
having a lot of users. Although I'm wondering about the following:
What other benefits/consequences are there to using virtual over system
users and vice versa?
Will virtual users have the same protection as system users (system users
would use linux permissions, which is pretty secure)?
How easy will it be to
2008 Feb 04
0
[LLVMdev] Introducing myself, and Java project.
You probably want to sit down and have a long talk with Jeroen Frijters, the
principal behind the IKVM project.
Note that you will have to deal with ClassLoaders at some level, regardless
of what you'd prefer.
> A more obvious problem is, of course, that it is not possible to
> compile Java code statically and save the result in the disk.
>
That is untrue--last time I checked, gcj
2006 May 05
3
iptables CLASSIFY vs fwmark?
Could someone comment on the benefits of using CLASSIFY vs fwmark (or
vice versa) in iptables?
I''m getting ready to implement some basic tc for VoIP and most of the
examples seem to use the (older?) fwmark syntax. Should I convert these
to CLASSIFY? Can the two syntaxes be mixed? Also with U32?
TIA,
Edwin
--
<=+=+=+==+=+=+==+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=>
Edwin Whitelaw, P.E.
New River
2009 Jan 16
0
No subject
FYI, not sure if it's of use to you... but... The digium tc400b is a transcoder card that can offload upto 120 channels of transcoding for g729 <-> ulaw... It's available as PCI only, but, if that's OK, it could be an alternative to replacing your server... G729 licenses are not needed when using that card...
There have been posts by some people about having multiple CPU
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] Java project, and introducing myself.
Hello, I am Ramon Garcia Fernandez. My interest in LLVM is to develop
an interface for Java virtual machine bytecodes, so that Java programs
can be run under LLVM.
You may ask why not using the Java virtual machine. Although it may be
improved, there are some misfeatures in it. This is what I have
learned. It makes the communication with native code too expensive.
Passing an array from native to
2013 Oct 21
2
Please be careful...
Please watch the addresses that you are responding to when mailing the
list. There continue to be replies to Harald Reindl on the list. Please
note that Reindl is not a subscriber to the list (and for good reason -
thank you, list admins) so any mail you get from him purporting to be
from the list is bogus; he sends mail to you Cc'd to the list (or vice-
versa) just to get his 2-cents back
2020 Aug 20
5
Clang is a resource hog, the installers for Windows miss quite some files, and are defect!
Hi @ll,
BUGS #1 & #2:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The installer LLVM-10.0.0-win64.exe dumps the following DUPLICATE files
in "C:\Program Files\LLVM\bin", WASTING about 500MB disk space, which is
nearly a third of the disk space occupied by the whole package:
| DIR "C:\Program Files\LLVM\bin" /O:-S
...
| 25.03.2020 12:15 83.258.880 clang-cl.exe
| 25.03.2020 12:03
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
>
> To minimize cost, Application Servers don't have to be expensive
> state-of-the-art machines. An Intel '386 processor is all that
> is required. Naturally, a '486 or Pentium would provide faster
> performance. Platinum for Windows operates under Novell NetWare
> or Windows NT network environments. For smaller installations not
> needing Pervasive SQL,
2008 Dec 01
1
[SPAM] - Re: [SPAM] - Dahdi, b410p and looping from 1 port to another - Email found in subject - Email found in subject
Apart from you were dialling out on your inbound context and
vice-versa.
The best advice I can give now is to change to mISDN - as this
is proven to work with v1.4 and v1.6.
Actually - have you tried putting the 100ohm termination on for
your NT port?
I need to do that with mISDN as it only allows ptmp for ISDN
extensions.
Cheers
Andy
-------------- next part
2012 Dec 17
2
[LLVMdev] max/min intrinsics
On Wednesday, December 05, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> > What does the community think?
>
> It seems inevitable. For the floating point version, please make it very clear
> what the behavior of max(-0,+0) and related cases are.
The following is our current proposal for llvm.fmax/fmin.*:
[1] If exactly one argument is a NaN, the intrinsic returns the other argument.
2007 Jul 11
1
aov() question
Hi all,
So I think I have seen some similar questions to mine when I searched
the archives, but have not seen any concrete answers and was
wondering if any one could help.
I have been trying to use R's aov() function to analyze my data. I
have a 3 x 4 x 2 repeated measures design. All of the IVs are within
subjects. I do also have missing values (unequal N), as I have to
remove
2006 Jan 22
2
What are the benefits of RoR?
We''ve all seen the productivity benefits of RoR. It would be worthwhile
to figure out where they come from.
For me, I''d say the following:
1. The number one benefit isn''t from Rails per se, but from Ruby, or any
other dynamic OO language (like Python). They avoid the weaknesses of
loosely typed, procedural languages like Perl & PHP, but have the
swiftness
2008 Feb 03
5
[LLVMdev] Introducing myself, and Java project.
Hello, I am Ramon Garcia Fernandez. My interest in LLVM is to develop
an interface for Java virtual machine bytecodes, so that Java programs
can be run under LLVM.
You may ask why not using the Java virtual machine. Although it may be
improved, there are some misfeatures in it. This is what I have
learned. It makes the communication with native code too expensive.
Passing an array from native to
2006 Mar 18
1
Curious Question
Thanks for the help on this mailing list, I now have my personal
home server allowing access without having to actually enter any login
information. All I had to do was set it to anonymous server and use
the 'hosts allow' parameter so that only my home machines can access
it.
However, now I'm curious. This will probably sound like the same
question I just asked on here but, would it
2005 Aug 16
1
preferences in used Compaq Proliant DL380 G1 vrs DL380 G2 etc
greetings,
for those of you in the know, may i have some assistance in helping to make
better decisions in purchasing more used server toys to install CentOS on
please? :-)
in the Compaq Proliant Rackmount DL380 line, the one that looks like the
older 1850R is called a G1 meaning Generation 1 right?
and then the DL380 G2 is a redesign that is gray and just has 6 drive bays
up front correct?
2005 Oct 03
0
Re: [which kernel for AMD Sempron processor?
Agreed: Should have read "socket A" semprons, since these are the most
common currently although rapidly disappearing...
>*1* type of Sempron is an Athlon XP processor, the Socket-462
>versions. With the Socket-754, it is an Athlon 64, although
>most have their 64-bit functions disabled. Only the lastest,
>specifically branded Sempron 64 have the same, full
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] Introducing myself, and Java project.
Have you looked at the this?
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/java/trunk/
Someone started a Java frontend. Perhaps you could finish it?
-Tanya
On Feb 2, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Ramón García wrote:
> Hello, I am Ramon Garcia Fernandez. My interest in LLVM is to develop
> an interface for Java virtual machine bytecodes, so that Java programs
> can be run under LLVM.
>
> You may ask
2009 Nov 21
1
Desiring to set up Windows Vista and Linux Fedora Core 4
Eero and others, I've already emailed this to Michael Wood:
> Most likely your D-Link router has a built in 4 port switch and does
> not control access between these 4 ports, so I doubt you need to do
> anything on the D-Link router.
Okay. I am now thinking it may be routing on the Windows box, so I
will next put my focus/attention more to that.
> > ? ? For example, I
2015 Sep 01
0
rfc: vhost user enhancements for vm2vm communication
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:35:21AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2015-08-31 16:11, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Hello!
> > During the KVM forum, we discussed supporting virtio on top
> > of ivshmem.
>
> No, not on top of ivshmem. On top of shared memory. Our model is
> different from the simplistic ivshmem.
>
> > I have considered it, and came up with an
2009 Mar 26
1
IAX problem through intermediate asterisk box
I'm having a problem with IAX running through an intermediate asterisk
box. Perhaps a small diagram will explain the situation better:
*A ------- [cloud (public internet)] ------- *B --------[cloud
(private network)]----------- *C
Asterisk server's A, B, and C, are all connected together with IAX
All asterisk servers are 1.6.0.6
Server A and B are geographically close, but connected over