similar to: BUG: soft lockup CPU stuck for 10seconds (Server went down)

how to install CentOS 5.6 i386 from livecd? Really dumb question I know :-) Hmm I know iI've done this in earlier releases on CentOS... Please point me to the right place in the wiki or faq to shame me... Thanks, Ken Wolcott

Hello everyone. Every time I try to install the odbc on wine, I've got this error [Image: http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/4769/winebug.png ] (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/585/winebug.png/) This seams to be, when mdac28 is being installed. Anyone can help me with this? Thanks, wizard2010 ------ System Information Ubuntu 10.10 Wine Version: 1.2.31 Winetricks Version: 20110629

Apologies if this is not relevant to this list. I am seeing errors when loading a large iptables file Using iptables-restore containing more than out 1000 rules reports errors shown below in the system log: I am using Centos5 and have tried various processors and memory from Celeron 2.4 to Core2Duo and 500Mb to 2Gb The problem appears to be related to the size of the ruleset being loaded -

When I try to umount btrfs filesystem I get always this error with kernel 3.11.4 and 3.11.3, but I can mount and umount without error on kernel 3.11.2. Exact error messages are: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [btrfs-transacti:680] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 23s! [umount:1575] I''m on Fedora 19 I have run scrub and there are no errors: # btrfs scrub status /home scrub

Hi I am running Lustre 1.8.1 on Scientific Linux with OFED 1.5. I have been running successfully for a few months, but experienced a serious crash yesterday. Following this, I am able to mount the mgs/mdt and the osts. But, whenever I now try to mount the lustre filesystem on the clients, I get a soft lockup CPU error. Any advice would be sincerely appreciated! Kindest regards! Fourie

By chance... it's not 3 replica, 1 arbiter is it? See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512371 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512371> -- Sam McLeod https://smcleod.net https://twitter.com/s_mcleod -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

reassign 646917 xen thanks -- .''`. Sell Crazy Someplace Else. We're all stocked up here : :' : `. `' `- Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux

I just updated my quad-processor X64 machine (AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 945 Processor) to the latest CentOS 5 xen kernel (2.6.18-371.4.1.el5xen) and I am getting occasional "BUG: soft lockup - CPU#n stuck for X s! [swapper:0]" messages. I did some net searching, and found some bugzilla reports (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649519 and http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4488),

2016-08-18 12:39 GMT-04:00 correomm <correomm at gmail.com>: > This bug is reported only on the VM's with CentOS 7 running on on VMware > ESXi 5.1. > The vSphere performance graph shows high CPU consume and disk activity only > on VM's with CentOS 7. Sometimes I can not connect remotely with ssh > (timeout error). > I'm also seeing those errors in several

Not sure if this was the last email on this.? If not ignore me. However I found a post for new operating systems that says to set the watchdog_thresh value instead of softlockup_thresh.? http://askubuntu.com/questions/592412/why-is-there-no-proc-sys-kernel-softlockup-thresh this is an Ubuntu post, but on my CentOS 7 system this parameter exists, and softlockup_thresh does not.??I have set it but

Never saw this email....Did anyone get it?? anyone know how to fix this?thanks again. From: KM <info4km at yahoo.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 11:26 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0] All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the email trail, the file

On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +0000, KM wrote: > All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the > email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist.? Should it be > added?? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. > Thanks in advance and sorry if I missed something along the way.KM Yes, I see this behavior as well. Never have found a solution - other

On 24 April 2018 at 17:16, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +0000, KM wrote: >>> All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs. but as stated in the >>> email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist. Should it be >>> added? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. >>>

On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 12:32:39AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:38:38AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > Hi Bobby, > > FYI we have also this one, but it seems related to > > syzbot+befff0a9536049e7902e at syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > > > Thanks, > > Stefano > > > > Got it, I'll look into it. > It seems

On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 1:44?AM Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:38:38AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > Hi Bobby, > > FYI we have also this one, but it seems related to > > syzbot+befff0a9536049e7902e at syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > > > Thanks, > > Stefano > > > > Got it, I'll

> 2016-08-18 12:39 GMT-04:00 correomm <correomm at gmail.com>: > >> This bug is reported only on the VM's with CentOS 7 running on on VMware >> ESXi 5.1. >> The vSphere performance graph shows high CPU consume and disk activity only >> on VM's with CentOS 7. Sometimes I can not connect remotely with ssh >> (timeout error). >> > I'm

what does it mean? i never seen that before xen4 on debian squeeze 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 [22077.208077] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for 61s! [udisks-dm-expor:11772] [22077.208139] Modules linked in: ext4 jbd2 crc16 xfs exportfs xt_tcpudp nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack xt_physdev bridge stp ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables xen_evtchn xenfs fuse

Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +0000, KM wrote: >> All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the >> email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist.? Should it be >> added?? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. >> Thanks in advance and sorry if I missed something along the way.KM > > Yes, I see this

Ian, I came across the subject line on a 96GB server with over 85 VMs running. Completely frozen and unresponsive, qemu-dm processes hung on event channels. I''m using the XenServer 6.0 dom0 kernel on top of the xen-unstable tip hypervisor. I believe you solved the issue backporting some event channel patches to the 2.6.32 kernel, as described in this thread

OS: CentOS 6.5. After I set multicast_router of bridge and it's port to 2, like following: echo 2 > /sys/devices/virtual/net/eth81/bridge/multicast_router echo 2 > /sys/devices/virtual/net/bond2/brport/multicast_router Then soft lockup occured: Message from syslogd at node-0 at Jan 9 15:47:12 ... kernel:BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [swapper:0] And the call