Niels Hendriks
2017-Nov-14 08:42 UTC
[Gluster-users] Changing performance.parallel-readdir to on causes CPU soft lockup and very high load all glusterd nodes
Hi, We're using a 3-node setup where GlusterFS is running as both a client and a server with a fuse mount-point. We tried to change the performance.parallel-readdir setting to on for a volume, but after that the load on all 3 nodes skyrocketed due to the glusterd process and we saw CPU soft lockup errors in the console. I had to completely bring down/reboot all 3 nodes and disable the setting again. There were tons of errors like mentioned below, does anyone know what could cause this? Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960126] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#6 stuck for 22s! [touch:25995] Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960168] Modules linked in: xt_multiport binfmt_misc hcpdriver(PO) nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_tcpudp xt_conntrack iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables xfs libcrc32c crc32c_generic nls_utf8 nls_cp437 vfat fat x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support kvm_intel kvm crc32_pclmul ast ttm aesni_intel drm_kms_helper efi_pstore aes_x86_64 lrw gf128mul evdev glue_helper ablk_helper joydev cryptd pcspkr efivars drm i2c_algo_bit mei_me lpc_ich mei mfd_core shpchp tpm_tis wmi tpm ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler acpi_pad processor button acpi_power_meter thermal_sys nf_conntrack_ftp nf_conntrack fuse autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 dm_mod hid_generic usbhid hid sg sd_mod crc_t10dif crct10dif_generic ehci_pci xhci_hcd ehci_hcd ahci libahci i2c_i801 crct10dif_pclmul crct10dif_common libata ixgbe i2c_core crc32c_intel dca usbcore scsi_mod ptp usb_common pps_core nvme mdio Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960224] CPU: 6 PID: 25995 Comm: touch Tainted: P O 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 Debian 3.16.43-2+deb8u5 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960226] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-1028U-TNR4T+/X10DRU-i+, BIOS 2.0c 04/21/2017 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960228] task: ffff88184bf872f0 ti: ffff88182cbc0000 task.ti: ffff88182cbc0000 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960229] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81519fe5>] [<ffffffff81519fe5>] _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960237] RSP: 0018:ffff88182cbc3b78 EFLAGS: 00000287 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960239] RAX: 0000000000005e5c RBX: ffffffff811646a5 RCX: 0000000000005e69 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960240] RDX: 0000000000005e69 RSI: ffffffff811bffa0 RDI: ffff88182e42bc70 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960241] RBP: ffff88182e42bc18 R08: 0000000000200008 R09: 0000000000000001 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960242] R10: 0000000000012f40 R11: 0000000000000010 R12: ffff88182cbc3af0 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960243] R13: 0000000000000286 R14: 0000000000000010 R15: ffffffff81519fce Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960244] FS: 00007fc005c67700(0000) GS:ffff88187fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960246] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960247] CR2: 00007f498c1ab148 CR3: 0000000b0fcf4000 CR4: 00000000003407e0 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960248] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960249] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960250] Stack: Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960251] ffffffff81513196 ffff88182e42bc18 ffff880aa062e8d8 ffff880aa062e858 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960254] ffffffff811c1120 ffff88182cbc3bd0 ffff88182e42bc18 0000000000032b68 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960256] ffff88182943b010 ffffffff811c1988 ffff88182e42bc18 ffff8817de0db218 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960258] Call Trace: Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960263] [<ffffffff81513196>] ? lock_parent.part.17+0x1d/0x43 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960268] [<ffffffff811c1120>] ? shrink_dentry_list+0x1f0/0x240 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960270] [<ffffffff811c1988>] ? check_submounts_and_drop+0x68/0x90 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960278] [<ffffffffa017f7f8>] ? fuse_dentry_revalidate+0x1e8/0x300 [fuse] Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960281] [<ffffffff811b4e5e>] ? lookup_fast+0x25e/0x2b0 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960283] [<ffffffff811b5ebb>] ? link_path_walk+0x1ab/0x870 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960285] [<ffffffff811ba2ec>] ? path_openat+0x9c/0x680 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960289] [<ffffffff8116c0fc>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x63c/0x1150 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960292] [<ffffffff8117253c>] ? mmap_region+0x19c/0x650 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960294] [<ffffffff811bb07a>] ? do_filp_open+0x3a/0x90 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960297] [<ffffffff811c736c>] ? __alloc_fd+0x7c/0x120 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960302] [<ffffffff811aa169>] ? do_sys_open+0x129/0x220 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960305] [<ffffffff8151a48d>] ? system_call_fast_compare_end+0x10/0x15 Nov 10 20:55:53 n01c01 kernel: [196591.960306] Code: 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 00 00 01 00 f0 0f c1 07 89 c2 c1 ea 10 66 39 c2 89 d1 75 01 c3 0f b7 07 66 39 d0 74 f7 f3 90 <0f> b7 07 66 39 c8 75 f6 c3 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 65 81 04 25 60 We are running Debian 8 with Glusterfs 3.12.2 Here are our settings: gluster volume info Volume Name: ssl Type: Replicate Volume ID: 8aa7bab2-a8dc-4855-ab46-bbcb4a9ff174 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: 10.0.0.1:/storage/gluster/ssl Brick2: 10.0.0.2:/storage/gluster/ssl Brick3: 10.0.0.3:/storage/gluster/ssl Options Reconfigured: performance.client-io-threads: off nfs.disable: on transport.address-family: inet network.ping-timeout: 5 Volume Name: www Type: Replicate Volume ID: d8d87920-f92d-4669-8509-acd1936ba365 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: 10.0.0.1:/storage/gluster/www Brick2: 10.0.0.2:/storage/gluster/www Brick3: 10.0.0.3:/storage/gluster/www Options Reconfigured: features.scrub: Active features.bitrot: on performance.flush-behind: on network.ping-timeout: 3 features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600 performance.write-behind-window-size: 4MB performance.quick-read: off performance.md-cache-timeout: 600 performance.io-thread-count: 64 cluster.readdir-optimize: on performance.write-behind: on performance.readdir-ahead: on performance.cache-size: 1GB performance.cache-invalidation: on features.cache-invalidation: on diagnostics.brick-log-level: WARNING performance.cache-priority: *.php:3,*.temp:3,*:1 network.inode-lru-limit: 90000 transport.address-family: inet nfs.disable: on performance.client-io-threads: off performance.parallel-readdir: off And here are our /etc/fstab entries for the fuse mountpoint: localhost:/ssl /etc/ssl/shared glusterfs backup-volfile-servers=10.0.0.2:10.0.0.3,log-level=WARNING 0 0 localhost:/www /var/www glusterfs backup-volfile-servers=10.0.0.2:10.0.0.3,log-level=WARNING 0 0 Fuse version: dpkg -l | grep fuse ii fuse 2.9.3-15+deb8u2 amd64 Filesystem in Userspace ii libfuse2:amd64 2.9.3-15+deb8u2 amd64 Filesystem in Userspace (library) Thank you! Niels Hendriks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171114/3cb051e7/attachment.html>
Sam McLeod
2017-Nov-14 22:01 UTC
[Gluster-users] Changing performance.parallel-readdir to on causes CPU soft lockup and very high load all glusterd nodes
By chance... it's not 3 replica, 1 arbiter is it? -- Sam McLeod https://smcleod.net https://twitter.com/s_mcleod -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171115/82fd8c74/attachment.html>
Sam McLeod
2017-Nov-14 22:02 UTC
[Gluster-users] Changing performance.parallel-readdir to on causes CPU soft lockup and very high load all glusterd nodes
By chance... it's not 3 replica, 1 arbiter is it? See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512371 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512371> -- Sam McLeod https://smcleod.net https://twitter.com/s_mcleod -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171115/5b633b40/attachment.html>
Niels Hendriks
2017-Nov-15 08:10 UTC
[Gluster-users] Changing performance.parallel-readdir to on causes CPU soft lockup and very high load all glusterd nodes
Hi Sam, Thanks for your response. No, we do not have any arbiters. Just 3x replica. Best regards, Niels Hendriks On 14 November 2017 at 23:02, Sam McLeod <mailinglists at smcleod.net> wrote:> By chance... it's not 3 replica, 1 arbiter is it? > > See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512371 > > -- > Sam McLeod > https://smcleod.net > https://twitter.com/s_mcleod > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171115/cd756cfd/attachment.html>
Maybe Matching Threads
- Changing performance.parallel-readdir to on causes CPU soft lockup and very high load all glusterd nodes
- 0-client_t: null client [Invalid argument] & high CPU usage (Gluster 3.12)
- Glusterd proccess hangs on reboot
- 0-client_t: null client [Invalid argument] & high CPU usage (Gluster 3.12)
- Gluster 3.13.0-1.el7 Packages Tested