similar to: SOLVED - Re: Frustrations with MySQL loss, tcpdump, netstat, etc

Hi All, Hi All, MySQL 5.0.77 on CentOS 5.4 MySQL is running, my Wordpress stuff is working, but I cannot connect to the server from my house. This server is in my house, however, but on a public IP, behind a firewall, etc. I checked my hardware firewall (a dedicated UnTangle system) and that is successfully allowing the passage. I know this because the firewall shows: 2009-12-22 6:29:41 am

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've used denyhosts. If you do have an issue with fail2ban, it does pretty much the same thing. Andy - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall? Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:08:07 +0200 From: Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com> Reply-To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> To:

make sure that your mountpoint does not have a .ogg extention with the mp3 stream, otherwise, it will try to play using the ogg plugin, and will stay at 0% buffer On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:45:09 +0100, Kai Schaetzl <maillists@conactive.com> wrote: > I'm new to streaming or music hearing over the wire, I still prefer my > old-fashioned stereo equipment :-) > But a friend asked me

really, it should have no extention, like /stream/1001 for the mountpoint On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:51:29 +0100, Kai Schaetzl <maillists@conactive.com> wrote: > Darrell Dominey wrote on Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:31:04 -0330: > > > make sure that your mountpoint does not have a .ogg extention with the > > mp3 stream, otherwise, it will try to play using the ogg plugin, and >

On 03 May 2008, Kai Schaetzl <maillists AT conactive.com> wrote: >Message: 61 >Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 13:31:14 +0200 > Message-ID: <VA.000031c6.00c102f3 at news.conactive.com> >*Have* you verified that you are not already on the latest kernel? [lanny at compaq1300 ~]$ uname -a Linux compaq1300.HOMELAN 2.6.18-8.el5 #1 SMP Thu Mar 15 19:57:35 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386

> On 16 August 2018 at 17:47 Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com> wrote: > > > Dovecot-owner at dovecot.org wrote on Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:14:00 +0300: > > > Message rejected by filter rule match > > Hello, > > why was this message rejected by a filter rule ? > (Posting first time to the list, yes, I subscribed.) > > Thanks, > > Kai

----- Original Message ----- > From:Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com> > To:centos at centos.org > Cc: > Sent:Tuesday, 5 April 2011, 13:21 > Subject:Re: [CentOS] KILL THIS THREAD ( Centos 6 Update?) > > +100 !!!! > > Kai Anybody that thinks this thread can be "killed" is so badly mis-understanding the situation. This thread or others like it

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com> wrote: > > This wasn't the first instance. This guy has recently started a habit of > copying mails (that are not his own it seems) that trip him off right to > this list. That is bad practice. I do not want to get more of this. > > Kai Kai, as you may not already know, Will Rogers said

Is there a program on CentOS which will sort my passwd/group etc. files by username or uid/gid? On Suse I can do this with a sysconfig switch and Suseconfig, is there something similar on RH-based systems? Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

I thought I post this link http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/12/help-saving-mysql.html in case anyone isn't aware of this yet and wants to email the EC. Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

On 03 May 2008, Kai Schaetzl <maillists AT conactive.com> wrote: >Message: 9 >Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 16:31:50 +0200 >Message-ID: <VA.000031c9.0166573a at news.conactive.com> >Lanny Marcus wrote on Sat, 3 May 2008 07:28:10 -0500: > Linux compaq1300.HOMELAN 2.6.18-8.el5 >Ok. I just asked because you never mentioned you had actually checked. >Just a kernel missing

My update to 5.2 fails on one machine because of this error: Transaction Check Error: file /etc/init.d from install of chkconfig-1.3.30.1-2 conflicts with file from package AcronisAgentLinux-9.5.8076-1 file /etc/init.d from install of chkconfig-1.3.30.1-2 conflicts with file from package TrueImageAgent-9.5.8076-1 Obviously, both packages created (completely unnecessarily) the /etc/init.d

Using CentOS 5.1 with Xen 3.2. I'm trying to install a fully virtualized system for the first time and doing this with an old Suse 9.0 (this probably would run paravirtualized, maybe it won't run, anyway, because of hardware problems). I start with virt-manager and after choosing "fully virtualized" it presents me two options for install media: iso image and CD-ROM or DVD,

I have a local mirror of CentOS5 base and updates. Now with 5 having become 5.1 and in case I just want to keep on updating (at the moment) is it enough that I update the mirror of updates or do I also need an update of the base repo? Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

The new virtual machine manager in Centos 5.1 displays some weird behavior here and I assume it's because the UUID of one running VM is the same as of a VM that is shut down. I used the same config file template for creating all my test VMs, so several have the same UUID. Didn't produce any problems with xm. But the new VM manager in Gnome shows active and inactive VMs and identifies

I took over a custom firewall script from my older Suse machines to my Dom-Us and it works just fine. Doing the same for Dom-0 immediately killed all traffic for the VMs. As there was no need before I had been dropping everything on the FORWARD chain. After ACCEPTing all for FORWARD my VMs are happy again. What's best practice on Dom-0, what do you do? Can I restrict the forwarding, in

Kai, It is a reality, but when you look at the RHEL target audience, it's not exactly hip devs deploying Docker in the cloud. Big corps, banks and the like have a very slow development cycle and long term support is absolutely crucial, software needs to run for years on end without glitches, without interruptions, in a very predictable manner etc. For the aforementioned devs I think the best

This is my first major version update after using a local repo. It seems that before I can "yum update" I have to fetch the complete new 5.2 base? Is this correct? When I run yum update it now fails with various strange dependency errors although all the updates are synced. When I change to using the original repo file it wants to download many many more and shows a lot of files that

El 22/10/2015 a las 01:40 p.m., Nux! escribi?: > Kai, > > It is a reality, but when you look at the RHEL target audience, it's not exactly hip devs deploying Docker in the cloud. > Big corps, banks and the like have a very slow development cycle and long term support is absolutely crucial, software needs to run for years on end without glitches, without interruptions, in a very

I converted a physical maschine running CentOS 4.6 to a Xen VM on a CentOS 5 host. Almost everything was running when I decided to rsync /lib and /usr a while later in order to get updated files and get the one or two non-working programs to work. There are differences because of the xenU kernel I didn't think about. I forgot to exclude rpm database and /lib/modules. Because the synced