similar to: Source for Kernel

Im trying to get a diskless boot set up under CentOS 5.2, and having no luck at all. I am to the point of running system-config-netboot, and whatever information I put in, I get an error message. Responding to the 2nd button on the first popup, which asks for NFS info, I put in the IP address of the current machine (the machine that will hold the boot images for the diskless machine) and the

OK, I did this once, several years ago, but I have to do it again, and I cant figure out what this stupid error message is trying to say. I am executing system-config-netboot trying to create a diskless client for a diskless boot I constantly get a popup, with different error messages. I try to 'fix' something, and I get a different popup. The current one says: You

This is a new instalation of CentOS 5.2 When I go to FireFox and try to watch a Video clip, some files transfer, and then I get the message "General Error" in the video window. I ASSUME some additional software needs to be downloaded, but what from where? When running on that Other OS, a message comes up giving you an opertunity to do the download. --

Ill report this as a bug, since I havent had any response to my question about it on the mailing lists. I am trying to get at the /smb file system. My understanding is to do this I MUST go thru the smbsh. When I try executing smbsh, I see: [reg@orion bin]$ smbsh Username: rwclemens Password: ERROR: can't get smbw shared lock (Invalid argument) Looking at the code its not

how can i get the source rpms for the packages installed on my centos 3.6 server? is there a certain repositories i have to add to my yum.conf? Im trying to setup a filtering program "smartfilter" and they want me to point to the source for squid, which i cant seem to find. can anyone shed some light on this for me? someone i was talking to said that centos strips out the source to

Having given up on getting system-config-netboot to work (reading the pointers I have received to the wiki, say it is broken), I have the simple question "What is it suposed to do???" I have tried to look at the code, but its written in python and I cant follow the logic. Im sure I can easily do whatever is necessary at the command line If I just knew what it was trying to do with its

I guess the uSSubject line says it all. Does smbwrapper/smbsh actually work? It took some editing to get smbwrapper to actually compile, but the changes seemed obvious (different versions of gcc?). However when I try to execute smbsh (RH7.0), I get to the message ERROR: can't get smbw shared lock which looks like it could be a difference between the way different OS handle things. So,

Hi, Just a quick note to see if anyone else noted the changes in yum in the updates. I've disabled thhe new format until i can verify if it works? As i rebuilt yumex from Scientific Linux (RHEL SRPM rebuild) and i have not enabled centosplus i don't wanna mess my system. I don't believe you can browse the new mirrors. __________________________________________________ Do You

Dear list, is there anyone who successfully compiled a Samba 3.0.X on a Solaris 9 box? I tried severl versions of Samba 3.0.* on five rather differently configured Solaris 9 boxes (Sparc) and ALWAYS get a build error on dynconfig.c Sometimes it seems to be a missing ldap-preprocessor define (which is protested by the compiler although I configured --with-ldap=NO), sometimes it is a header file

Okay, so far so good - and many thanks to all who jumped in on this one. Now, we would like to look into making some changes in XFS, but I didn't see a SRPM for the kernel-module-xfs for 42.0.8 - the most recent one is for 42.0.3. Is this usable, or is there somewhere (else?) I can get the SRPM for the 42.0.8 XFS? Thanks. > -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at

Is there some reason the ahci kernel module is *missing* from the 2.6.9-89.0.16.plus.c4 kernel? It is in the standard 2.6.9-89.0.16.EL kernel. Is this due to an oversight or is there some sort of conflict? I wanted to add IEEE1394 support to my system running CentOS 4.8. I *looks* like what I need to do is download the kernel SRPM and patch the config to include the IEEE1394 modules and

Application: DWFViewer.exe Wine 0.9.14 - mandriva 2006.0 This is Autocad's "free" viewer program for dwf files. I had to install IE6 first as a pre-requisite. I used the Wine recommended method of adding that one dll to the windows/system32 directory then ran ie6setup.exe to install it. The DWFViewer installed fine, but then when trying to run it this message came up: This

Alan& Akemi, Would it be possible to get CONFIG_ARPD turned on in the centosplus 6.x kernel? It is required to use opennhrp. See the link below where is was decided to turn it on in Fedora. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502844 -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com

I've been using RPMs for PG 8.1 from CentosPlus for some time now. I've been very happy with them, and they've been wonderfully stable. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/centosplus/x86_64/RPMS/ But now 8.2 is out. Are there any plans to support PG 8.2 in CentosPlus, or should I go ahead with RPMS directly from PG?

Hi, John Can you try the attached patch ? This issue can be reproduced on SMP platform, while the domain 0 is UP. The reason is, after finishing a dma request, the dma thread will trigger the interrupt and then clear the call back function. When guest get the interrupt , it will try to check the call back function, if it is set, then it will trigger a dma request again. So if the checking for

On 2/2/12 2:32 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > On 02/02/12 14:25, Clemens Hammacher wrote: >> On 2/2/12 1:51 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > ... >>> what do you mean by "copied over to the main module"? If you want to add >>> additional IR to the main module then you should link it in using the >>> linker. >> >> I think that the linker would indeed

On 2/2/12 1:51 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > On 02/02/12 13:30, Clemens Hammacher wrote: >> On 2/2/12 1:15 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> I have to ask: why are you writing these modules out as separate bc files? >> >> I knew that someone would ask that ;) >> We need to have separate modules during runtime. One of them contains the code >> that is actually JIT

Just for the record, we are currently working with someone from SGI to get a much better implementation of XFS working with the centosplus kernel. I want to wait to push the centosplus unsupported kernel (2.6.9-22) until we have this new and much more stable version of XFS code implemented. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

Hi Clemens - thanks for your response. Clemens Hammacher wrote: > Hi Michael, > > since noone of the experts answered, let me share our experiences. We > recently had exactly the same problem, I posted on this list on January > 31st. > I didn't follow Duncans advice to "just use the linker", since for > several reasons we wanted to have unique struct types

Hi, I made the switch from KDE4->XFCE, and because gdm takes more time than xfce to start I would like to replace it with lightdm. I installed lightdm, set it as default display manager and configured the gtk greeter. However, when I start I only get a black screen (x running) and nothing else happens. When I start it as root with the --test-mode argument, I get the following message: lightdm