similar to: Fasttrack Repo on CentOS 4

Unless I'm mistaken, does it look like Centos 4.7 is missing an update released on December 3rd 2008? Upstream details :- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0989.html An updated tmpwatch package that fixes various bugs is now available. The tmpwatch utility recursively searches through specified directories and removes files which have not been accessed in a specified period of time.

The upstream provider has started a new channel called fastrack. It is detailed here (see the whole thread): https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-April/msg00001.html CentOS will also build the fastrack SRPMS. We have created separate repositories in CentOS-3 and CentOS-4 called fasttrack. (I know the spelling is different, that is by design. We don't want to use the name of

I see the two distribution points for each release, they seem very alike, what is the difference? -Ross

CentOS just announced an exim FASTTRACK package http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-April/017438.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html While I am not interested in local_scan() or man pages, Bugzilla #606272 looks mysterious because I can not find information about it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606272 The only information I see is comment 16

Hi, where I can find former file centos/4/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo? Thanks, David

Some people don't know how to conduct themselves on usenet and mailing lists. Despite the mailing list guidelines being crystal clear about no html posting and not top-posting we have people still doing so. People still use text-readers to access the mailing list so you could be denying access to these people by flouting the mailing list guidelines. This is an example of top-posting

Just an FYI; hopefully someone who knows will be able to fix :-) http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories says CentOS-Fasttrack - This repository contains bugfix and enhancement updates, issued from time to time, between update sets that may be rolled into the next update set. See this Readme file for more details. This repository has a config file located here for

In the yum priorities page on the wiki Akemi Yagi suggests http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities [base], [addons], [updates], [extras] ... priority=1 [centosplus],[contrib] ... priority=2 Third Party Repos ... priority=N (where N is > 10 and based on your preference) If you have rpmforge, kbs, epel all set up at 10 then wouldn't those also potentially overwrite

I have a choice of CentOS 4/5 and Fedora 9 on a laptop. I have not use CentOS 5 on a desktop but have used CentOS 4 and Fedora 9. I found the Fedora Gnome not as appealing as the CentOS 4 clearlooks. Any opinions from someone who has used CentOS 4/5 and Fedora? I'm not a KDE fan so KDE users need not reply. Regards, Vandaman.

There are significant components of the upstream 5.6 release which are stuck behind the CentOS 5.6 release process, but are now incorporated in EPEL 5 components. In particular, the "php53" package is now necessary for the "drupal6" EPEL components, due to the long out of date PHP 5.1 in the default upstream vendor's codebase. I see that some of these components are

Greetings, I tried to install FASTTRACK repos today from this link: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories and the links were broken e.g. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo fyi, Max Pyziur pyz at brama.com

Do people have wet underwear for nothing over XEN? See http://www.redhat.com/promo/qumranet/ <snip> Q: Will Red Hat continue to support and contribute to Xen? A: Yes. Red Hat will support Xen until at least 2014 (seven years after the release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5). We are committed to insulating our customers from changes in the infrastructure components and this is why we

Do people have wet underwear for nothing over XEN? See http://www.redhat.com/promo/qumranet/ <snip> Q: Will Red Hat continue to support and contribute to Xen? A: Yes. Red Hat will support Xen until at least 2014 (seven years after the release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5). We are committed to insulating our customers from changes in the infrastructure components and this is why we

Greetings, Are FASTTRACK updates delivered by way of a different repo? Thanks. Max Pyziur pyz at brama.com ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:29:52 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> Reply-To: centos at centos.org To: centos-announce at centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1035 CentOS 5 telnet FASTTRACK Update CentOS Errata and

The *CentOS-Fasttrack *paragraph of http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories links to http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo which returns a 404. https://web.archive.org/web/20141011004000/http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo is a copy captured on Oct 11, 2014, which indicates CentOS-6 Fasttrack was around at that time.

Karanbir Singh wrote: > And yea, working on setting up a sort of list to handle > much of this semi OT traffic. More news on that around > Wed next week, dint ask about it now. Off course people are going to ask. In my opinion as long as a topic is marked OT, it is preferable to one not marked but one in which the OP has not even done basic research on his problem. One distro had a

Hi, On the page http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories?action=show ... CentOS-6 Fasttrack is now available and can be accessed with the repo configuration here<http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo> . But link is died: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo Anyone could help me to found this file please ? Thanks,

I don't know if it's useful to report this: (& who should I report it to?) # yum update [...] * base: mirrors.ircam.fr * extras: mirrors.ircam.fr * fasttrack: mirror.ovh.net * remi-ff: rpms.famillecollet.com * updates: centosq3.centos.org base | 3.7 kB 00:00 cr | 2.9 kB 00:00 extras | 3.4 kB 00:00 fasttrack | 3.4 kB 00:00 Not using downloaded repomd.xml

Elliott Mitchell writes ("[PATCH 12/12] Partially revert "Cross-compilation fixes.""): > This partially reverts commit 16504669c5cbb8b195d20412aadc838da5c428f7. Wow, that is an upsteam commit from 2005. However, I would like some kind of explanation. Is it in fact now false that | # These don't cross-compile ? Should this patch go upstream ? Ian. -- Ian Jackson

The permissions are apparently set incorrectly on the vnc SRPM in the FastTrack repo on mirror; I get "permission denied" when I try to mirror it. Thanks. Josh Kelley