similar to: A couple of minutes on GnuPG and signing files

On 4/26/10 21:45:55 R P Herrold wrote: > Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:45:55 -0400 (EDT) > From: R P Herrold<herrold at owlriver.com> > To: Marshall Feldman<marsh at uri.edu> > Cc:r-help at r-project.org > Subject: [R] Upgrading R using the "global library folder" strategy -, > what do you think about it? > Message-ID:<alpine.LRH.2.00.1004262141510.25472

I seem to be having network and email issues tonight; please excuse any duplication -- Russ herrold -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 HTML dump on Thu Jul 30 00:30:33 EDT 2009 http://www.centos.org/ Open Letter to Lance Davis July 30, 2009 04:39 UTC This is an Open Letter to Lance Davis from fellow CentOS Developers It is regrettable that we are forced

Thanks. Here are my results for the commands you list: > which pdflatex /bin/pdflatex > rpm -qf /usr/bin/pdflatex texlive-latex-bin-bin-svn14050.0-43.20130427_r30134.el7.noarch > cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) > rpm -qi texlive-latex-bin-bin-svn14050.0-43.20130427_r30134.el7.noarch Name : texlive-latex-bin-bin Epoch : 2 Version :

You're definitely missing bits of texlive. Lots of "missing file: mf" in your debug logs. I think you need to start with installing texlive-metafont. Alternately, there are pre-built R 3.6.2 packages for EL-7 here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1421894 I cannot push them as official updates to EPEL because of the catch-22 created by R's dependency on

I responded to a post in the Dell poweredge mailing list earlier today. My answer was off the top of my head, with a bit of experimentation. The content may be useful in the Cenyos context as well to admin's looking to strip the size of an install to the bare bones. Comment welcomed. Can anyone see any packages which I have missed? -- Russ Herrold ---------- Forwarded message

2011/3/23 R P Herrold <herrold at owlriver.com> > This comes and goes, and really there is no substitute for actually > 'doing' rather than > talking in the cloister > > as i see it, the problem is while the users expectation has grown, the work became harder. so i believe the real question is: how can we help the CentOS project? how can we unload the developers so

From: R P Herrold <herrold at owlriver.com> > Bryan - Please don't overstate this and make a problem where > none exists. There is an infinity of choices of which you > list three ... > Nor does one _have_ to 'get involved' with either the > RH-Fedora or Centos project to do effective distribution > building, or add-on packaging. There are independent

"Bzzzt wrong --- yada" is contentious, we don't need it. Please. 2: It's not rpm, it's the packager => "The killer is innocent, the *gun* killed the victim" " the gun didn't kill him, the *bullet* did" "no, the wound did!" "no, the loss of blood did" "no, dying did". *jeesh* Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner at

cAos and CentOS administration 20 March 2005 1 Executive Summary The cAos project, and the CentOS project are being separated into two trees; Changes which facilitate DNS and mirror master administration process for easier load management are already complete. 2 Announcement In the past two years, the concept of truly community based, locally rebuildable distributions,

cAos and CentOS administration 20 March 2005 1 Executive Summary The cAos project, and the CentOS project are being separated into two trees; Changes which facilitate DNS and mirror master administration process for easier load management are already complete. 2 Announcement In the past two years, the concept of truly community based, locally rebuildable distributions,

I have not proceeded past loading your files as it is complaining about Clearsigned file invalid, etc...: :~$ sudo wget -O - http://apt.van-belle.nl/louis-van-belle.gpg-key.asc | sudo apt-key add - --2018-11-30 00:03:40-- http://apt.van-belle.nl/louis-van-belle.gpg-key.asc Resolving apt.van-belle.nl (apt.van-belle.nl)... 149.210.206.148, 2a01:7c8:aab6:5ab:5054:ff:feff:ae66 Connecting to

and AJB kernel-2.6.35-3.bcat.src.rpm [I see AlanBartlett as the last editor on that page] I have installed the given ajb source rpm kernel-2.6.35-3.bcat.src.rpm, and verified that it is intact: [herrold at kernel-bleeder linux-2.6.35.i686]$ rpm -Vp ~/build/ajb/sources/kernel-2.6.35-3.bcat.src.rpm warning: /home/herrold/build/ajb/sources/kernel-2.6.35-3.bcat.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature:

After a bit of testing, and interest on the IRC channel, I prepared a full package list, the subset, and a diff. These are visible for RC1 at: http://www.owlriver.com/centos/one-iso/ -- Russ Herrold

On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, Barris, Wes wrote: > I have been able to build previous versions of R up to and including 3.5.3 successfully. Starting with 3.6.0 > the "make check" step fails with errors relating to "pdflatex" being missing. So, I installed texlive-latex > (and the 100 other rpm dependencies) then tried rebuilding R. "make check" continues to fail.

Some threads just go on too long. Personally I think a troll has hijacked the main centos list again and is inducing food fight behaviours while that troll perfectly 'innocently' asserting that it is just respoding to all email. see: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4216011961522818645 for a discussion of the problem of 'capture' in FOSS projects. But if one loses

Hi, I'm trying to create an account to have access to more texts, the ones with "?". But I get the error "Failed to verify clearsigned PGP body" on the return email. I use gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.18. Could someone help me? Thanks in advance. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

There was mention of this [r-sig-fedora at r-project.org] mailing list on one of the other R lists overnight. I thought the list needed a bit of posting, as I could not recall seeing content recently on it. I cross post to the Red Hat hosted list as well, it raises issues relevant there as well I have been packaging in support of many of the financial packages at CRAN and in R-Forge [

I see this commit: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:42:14 From: noreply at centos.org To: noreply at centos.org Subject: centos wiki] Update of AdditionalResources/Repositories by PhilSchaffner The following page has been changed by PhilSchaffner: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories?action=diff&rev2=96&rev1=95 The comment on

Bah, headers still broken, sending to list this time: On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 6:30 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Mar 13, 2010, at 7:01 AM, R P Herrold wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Tanya Lattner wrote: >>> >>>>> I

On Tue, September 14, 2010 02:30, R P Herrold wrote: > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> So, I'm quite keen on finding out what is it that is causing >> the breakage for you > > Karanbir, in the middle of the thread from the archive: > > James B. Byrne at Mon Sep 13 12:59:25 EDT 2010 >> Did that via webmin's command interface and nothing