similar to: IPv6 static routing

I can't get IPv6 routing to configure correctly despite everything I've read saying it should This is my network config on a fully-updated CentOS 5.8 system: # cat /etc/sysconfig/network NETWORKING=yes NETWORKING_IPV6=yes HOSTNAME=my.hostname.com GATEWAY=aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd IPV6_DEFAULTGW=2a02:aaaa.bbbb::1 IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=eth0 # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0

My ISP assigned prefix is: 2607:F4B8:3::/48 So I am building my internal IPv6 firewall/router/ etc. I want to have a static IPv6 address on its eth0 so that I can create static v6 routes to it from the gateway. I add the following lines to ifcfg-eth0: HWADDR=00:40:F4:05:A8:F1 IPV6INIT=yes IPV6_AUTOCONF=no IPV6ADDR="2607:F4B8:3:1" if-up eth0 gets the error: Error: an inet prefix

I have centos 6 running kvm. IPv4 works perfectly works. But I am having some problem with ipv6, looks like its bridge routing problem but stuck. here are my bridge detail: bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.000af75613f2 no eth1 vnet1 br4 8000.000af75613f0 no eth0 ip -6 route shows : unreachable ::/96 dev lo metric 1024 error -101 mtu 65536 advmss 65476 hoplimit 4294967295

hello, i met a problem in configuratiion of ipv6 gw in my box i install centos 6.3 (64 bit) on my boxs, which have four netcard. i use a straight-through cable to connect centosv0:netcard-2 and centosv1:netcard2 the topology is this: client c(windows xp) <-->centosv0:netcard-3 <--> centosv0:netcard-2 <---> centosv1:netcard-2 <---->centosv1:netcard-2 <---> client d

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A few months back, I tried to use the network scripts to provision an IPv6 range like can be done with IPv4. I was using CentOS 5.2 at the time and was informed that 5.2 was broken in this regard. I have upgraded to CentOS 5.3 now and I am trying to get IPv6 to provision an entire range of IPs, but I am still getting the old behavior and no IPs are

Hello all I continue fighting with load balancing, I though it was easier :-/ Here is the script with my configuration #!/bin/sh IFI=eth0 IPI=192.168.10.155 NMI=24 IFE1=eth1 IPE1=192.168.1.128 NWE1=192.168.1.0 NME1=24 BRD1=192.168.1.255 GWE1=192.168.1.1 IFE2=eth2 IPE2=192.168.254.128 NWE2=192.168.254.0 NME2=24 BRD2=192.168.254.255 GWE2=192.168.254.254 ip link set $IFI up ip addr add

Hello Im having a problem similar to sawar Here is my configuration --------------eth1---192.168.1.128---------- -------------192.168.1.1 ISP router 1 | my | ---Eth0---192.168.10.157----| | | linux |

I have a 2.6.12(ubuntu-patchset), kernel recompiled with this routing options: [*] IP: advanced router [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath Load balancing is working great, but i have problems whits long term tcp flows (like msn-messenger or vpns or any other type of long term ip based conection). I assume this is because after a period of time, the per-host

rhbz#698650 Signed-off-by: Joey Boggs <jboggs at redhat.com> --- scripts/network.py | 3 +- scripts/ovirt-config-setup.py | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ scripts/ovirtfunctions.py | 20 ++++++++++------ 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/network.py b/scripts/network.py index ccc4bd8..f51ee7c 100644 ---

rhbz#698650 Signed-off-by: Joey Boggs <jboggs at redhat.com> --- scripts/network.py | 3 +- scripts/ovirt-config-setup.py | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- scripts/ovirtfunctions.py | 22 +++++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/network.py b/scripts/network.py index ccc4bd8..f51ee7c 100644 ---

hi i have a strange night with our firewall ;) i wanted to utilize the icmp redirect packages to connect our to different networks on the same segment i have a lot of these messages in dmesg: Redirect from 10.0.0.2 on lo about 152.66.235.1 ignored. Advised path = 0.0.0.0 -> 0.0.0.0, tos 00 --- with tcpdump i saw strange packets crawling on the lo interface ;) IP 10.0.0.2 > 0.0.0.0: icmp

Hi, I think I found a problem in iproute or ubuntu kernel. I think that the "ip route get" returns wrong interface and gateway in an multipath routing environment on Ubuntu 6.06 LTS. I reported it also to launchpad as a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/105521 The easiest way to reproduce it is to start an Ubuntu 6.06 LTS Live on a system with three

Dear all, I''ve the following problem with routing + NAT: If I''ve two ISP and I''m using two nexthop in default route with MASQUERADE on both ISP links, I see routing cache regenerated, but sometimes packets sent to a new link (after cache regeneration) uses wrong source address for masquerading. Here is the config. I''ve two links to outside via two

Hi! I have many problems getting this thing to work. There''s a host with two network interfaces, where there are two routers to Internet in two separated networks. The host uses multihop routing for deciding to which router send the packets... but the routing decision is wrong made. Some packets with source address of one NIC, go to other network. I have a host with three NICs in it:

If you select an option that's not listed during ipv4/ipv6 setup it will accept it without verification. This corrects that behavior and forces a valid option to be picked. --- scripts/ovirt-config-networking | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/ovirt-config-networking b/scripts/ovirt-config-networking index

Signed-off-by: Joey Boggs <jboggs at redhat.com> --- scripts/network.py | 8 ++++++-- scripts/ovirt-config-setup.py | 15 +++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/network.py b/scripts/network.py index fd78877..8159283 100644 --- a/scripts/network.py +++ b/scripts/network.py @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ class Network:

Hi, my box is connected to 3 networks, eth0 eth1 wlan0. I want "my" traffic to go via wlan0 and everything from eth1 NATed to eth0: eth0 192.168.1.10/24 eth1 172.16.1.1/12 wlan0 192.168.10.190/24 I first tried this with two single hosts: iptables -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE -o eth0 -t nat iptables -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE -o wlan0 -t nat echo 200 Forw >>

hi: *I have this 2 boxes set up like this:* 2020::2/128 2020::254/128 3030::254/128 192.168.0.2/24 192.168.0.254/24 192.168.30.254/24 +-------+ eth0 eth3 +-------+ | |=======================| | eth1 | A | | B |---- | | | |

* sorry for the 2 previous schemas, they came out a mess. I hope this one is understandable. hi: I have this 2 boxes set up like this: 2020::2/128 2020::254/128 3030::254/128 192.168.0.2/24 192.168.0.254/24 192.168.30.254/24 +-------+ eth0 eth3 +-------+ | |==================== | | eth1 | A | | B | ---- | |

I've tried straight the IP into the share \\x.y.z.k\, same behaviour. The server is smbd 4.7.6 on Ubuntu 18.04. The client is cifs-utils 6.8.2, samba-common 4.10.0 on Ubuntu 19.04 What i get on dmesg is [ 1395.187394] CIFS VFS: Server x.y.z.k has not responded in 120 seconds. Reconnecting... Server's smb.conf: [global] unix extensions = yes case sensitive = auto delete readonly = yes