similar to: Not seeing all memory in CentOS 5.1 x86_64

Hi ! I've fetched a spare AVM B1 card from the cellar, and installed it. After "modprobe b1pci" I did "capiinit" and capiinit moaned about a missing t1.b4. So I search the web and found one at http://www.avm.de/ftp/cardware/b1/x_misc/ddi/. When I now look at the controller, I finally see p2p-mode: # cat /proc/capi/controllers/1 name b1pciv4-a400 io

I'm recording TCP network throughput performance between Dom0 IP stack and all my guest domains (currently 6 running simultaneously). All guests are running simultaneously, but I only ever transmit between Dom0 and one of the DomUs while the other five are idle. When running a netperf TCP_STREAM test (netperf on Dom0, netserver on DomU) I record the following performance numbers, CPU % as

I have a box running CentOS 5.x 32 bit. I noticed these kernels are installed. [root at ns1 log]# rpm -qa |grep kern |sort kernel-2.6.18-194.11.1.el5 kernel-2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 kernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-194.11.1.el5 kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 [root at ns1 log]# uname -a Linux ns1.xx.net 2.6.18-194.11.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 10

Hi, here are some minor patches that for various reasons I've not submitted yet - I'm just trying to clear my list of differences before christmas... First of all the clear.patch file contains a patch that enables the JIT to drop all global mappings. I need this because when I have N threads I compile N different versions of my functions using different memory areas for global

Morten, The leaks.patch file introduced a static destructor ordering problem which lead to garbled output. The comment above those lines of code indicates why it needs to be the way it is. My bad for committing it in the first place. Please be careful in the future. Reid. On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 05:30, Morten Ofstad wrote: > Hi, > > here are some minor patches that for various reasons

Is there a way I can prevent processes from taking up all the ram then swap until the box crashes/freezes? I'm using IEs4Linux and the wineserver seems to start taking up RAM until my box dies, it happens slowly. I am able to kill the sucker now, but I'd like to not have to worry about that. sar -r 01:00:01 PM kbmemfree kbmemused %memused kbbuffers kbcached kbswpfree kbswpused

News to me. Probably worth considering when choosing your deployment options. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/09/salesforce_why_buy_heroku/print.html Dreamforce 2010 Why would a company that spent 10 years delivering CRM as a service drop $212m in cash and $27m in stock on a 30-person startup that hosts Ruby on Rails apps for devs on Amazon? Salesforce.com vice president of technology and

Hello to all, I am having a web server mail server Mysql and name server on single machine my os is CentOs 5.2 and desktop gnome everything was working fine now couple of days back I was using text editor, Fire Fox and GIMP at a time and my mouse started to act funny as well as very slow even my keyboard curser moves very slow I feel it is some sort of memory problem but I have noticed the

v2: - Moved the btrfs available test into the subclause where it is used. Note I got tired of fighting emacs indentation mode and I pushed a whitespace only patch which fixes the indentation to be 4 spaces instead of 2 spaces: https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/commit/df54c75d4c53ed580e5269306e11e0758d169452 This v2 patch requires that one. Rich.

Hi, I'm having a similar problem, I get "The cluster size in this system is not supported." I get this when running wine InstMsiA.exe (using the version from microsoft.com). It comes up in a windows message box. I'm running wine from yesterday's cvs. I tried running Rein's test program from this old email and I get the following output: % wine fds 'c:\'

This first factors out all the partition sizing, and then resizes the images created to be 1GB instead of 512MB, to work around a size limitation with btrfs: mkfs_btrfs: /dev/vda2: device /dev/vda2 is too small (must be at least 256 MB)

Dear R users, I want to aggregate all *d *data from all combination of n *plots* taken by k. Thank very much! My data is like that: plot d 1 14 1 13 1 12 1 14 1 18 1 20 1 21 1 43 1 108 1 43 2 41 2 61 2 83 2 61 2 84 2 45 2 21 2 12 2 11 ... 100 10 100 12 -- --- Catalin-Constantin ROIBU Forestry engineer, PhD Forestry Faculty of Suceava

I've been getting a lot of timeouts on non-critical invite transactions. I turned on sip debug. They were the result of SIP invites like this: Retransmitting #10 (NAT) to 185.107.94.10:13057: SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 215.45.145.211:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-524287-1---zg4cfkl50hpwpv4p;received=185.107.94.10;rport=13057 From:

On 12/30/2017 08:18 PM, Dovid Bender wrote: > Script kiddies trying to find vulnerable systems that they can make > calls on. Lock down the box with iptables and use fail2ban to block > them. The via is probably bogus unless a box at the DoD was comprimised. > > > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 6:49 PM, sean darcy <seandarcy2 at gmail.com > <mailto:seandarcy2 at

Why is my load stuck around 3? top - 01:19:55 up 146 days, 5:53, 2 users, load average: 3.00, 2.95, 2.52 Tasks: 121 total, 1 running, 120 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.0% us, 0.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 99.7% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si Mem: 1928300k total, 1911640k used, 16660k free, 10760k buffers Swap: 2031608k total, 224k used, 2031384k free, 1561196k cached

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.1-4 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** Hello Debian Team, I have some strange behavior with a DL585 G7 with only two cpu sockets used (Opteron 6238 Interlagos). I use Debian 6.0 with a XEN Kernel. Every time when I start a DomU, the server makes a hard reset without any kernel panic or output. When I start the

I have asterisk installed on a Dell 2850 dual-Xeon 3.0Ghz box with 2GB of memory. This is serving about 75 sip clients, Polycom500's and 600's. We are running into problems with the memory. Asterisk, right now, is using about 1.8GB of system memory. I am using Asterisk 1.0.7, Zaptel 1.0.7 with Digiums TE410 1xT1 RBS and 1xT1 PRI, Libpri 1.0.7 on Fedora Core 3. My question; is this

Is it possible for the uid/gid numbers that are generated by the idmap_rid and idmap_hash to collide if there are a large number of users or groups? I cannot seem to find any documentation on the limitations of these plugins. Before using I want to make absolutely sure that there won't be any collisions. In doing some research about Likewise Open, I see it's hashing routine can have

This series fixes inspection in the case that fstab contains references to md devices. I've made a few changes since the previous posting, which I've summarised below. [PATCH 1/8] build: Create an MD variant of the dummy Fedora image I've double checked that no timestamp is required in the Makefile. The script will not run a second time to build fedora-md2.img. [PATCH 2/8] build:

Samba mount (from one of our build scripts). We decided to upgrade to RedHat 7.2 (which uses a newer version of Samba -- 2.1.1b IIRC), maybe that fixes the problem. However, I decided to submit this bug report, in the hope that it may help kill some bugs. (Remember -- the only good bug, is a dead bug :)) So, here is the dmesg output: Linux version 2.2.16-22enterprise