similar to: Bug#611065: Network routing does not work

I am using Debian 6.0 "Squeeze", I applied that patch (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591456) to xen-common because of lack of hotplugpath.sh. network-route netdev=eth1 now does work, but vif-route gives me this error: root at xen-dom0:~# xm create /srv/xen/profiles/ca.cfg Using config file "/srv/xen/profiles/ca.cfg". Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be

I am using Debian 6.0 "Squeeze", I applied that patch (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591456) to xen-common because of lack of hotplugpath.sh. network-route netdev=eth1 now does work, but vif-route gives me this error: root at xen-dom0:~# xm create /srv/xen/profiles/ca.cfg Using config file "/srv/xen/profiles/ca.cfg". Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be

Distro: debian unstable Xen version: 4.0.0-2 This is the config: #HVM #still no qemu-dm in debian #kernel = "/usr/lib/xen-4.0/boot/hvmloader" #builder = ''hvm'' #memory = 2048 #name = "webserver" #vif = [''bridge=eth0''] #disk = [''tap:tapdisk:aio:/srv/xen/webserver.img,xvda,w'',''phy:/dev/cdrom,xvdb:cdrom,r'']

# dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/xen/webserver.img oflag=direct bs=1M seek=4095 count=1 # dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/xen/webserver.img oflag=direct bs=1M count=4096 root@debian:~# grub-install /dev/xvda Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub The file /boot/grub/stage1 not read correctly. Darkbasic _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Do you know if squeeze has xen support? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.0-1 Severity: grave The only thing I can read is: ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 2 ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 9 ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 9 cannot read /etc/fstab: no such file or directory mounting [...] failed: no such file or directory I boot with: moltiboot [xen] module [kernel] root=[uuid or device] ro quiet

Hello List, why is the Bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591456 not fixed yet? It was already reported back in 2010 and a patch was already supplied, too. Is this a bigger deal? Thanks, Mario

Hi, I explain what I want to do.. All the operators share their phones. The number of the operator isn't constant, so it's possible that two operators share all the phones. They need to move all around, so they pick up the first phone they find. If there are only few operator is very annoying for them to ear the other phones ringing while they are at the phone! So I'dd like to limit

Hey all, I have moved 10_Linux to 50_Linux and ran update-grub which is fine. The problem I have is that there is xen-syms in /boot And that is being put first in the boot list which is incorrect. How do you make /xen.gz at the top so it is booted first? Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Hi, this is an old outstanding problem, unfortunately I don't remember how to walkaround it. I use asterisk 1.8.3 and I have a public IP in my network interface. As soon as the Internet connection goes down, phones stop working. I want to be able to use pstn, isdn and the gsm gateway even if the Internet connection goes down, how can I achieve it? Thank you, Darkbasic

Is there a fix for this in the works/coming for squeeze or do I have to patch the package myself? If so, how? Thanks, a grateful Debian user that hasn't patched packages yet! Steve -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20101122/8433308c/attachment.htm>

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 628912 xen-utils-common 4.0.1-2 Bug #628912 [xen-utils-4.0] xenconsoled and xenstored stopping unhandled by init script Bug reassigned from package 'xen-utils-4.0' to 'xen-utils-common'. No longer marked as found in versions xen/4.0.1-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #628912 to the same values

Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.0-2 Severity: normal This is the config: #HVM #still no qemu-dm #kernel = "/usr/lib/xen-4.0/boot/hvmloader" #builder = 'hvm' #memory = 2048 #name = "webserver" #vif = ['bridge=eth0'] #disk = ['tap:tapdisk:aio:/srv/xen/webserver.img,xvda,w','phy:/dev/cdrom,xvdb:cdrom,r'] #device-model =

> this two patches add blktap2 functionality to xen-utils. I backported > http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-unstable.hg?rev/ca2738f258f8 to remove > license issues. Has this patch been applied? Darkbasic

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > found 602378 4.0.1-1 Bug #602378 [src:xen] xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64: Live migration of Guests crashes and reboots Marked as found in versions xen/4.0.1-1. > found 679533 4.0.1-5.2 Bug #679533 [src:xen] Traffic forwarding issue between Xen domU/dom0 Marked as found in versions xen/4.0.1-5.2. > found 660882 4.0.1-4 Bug #660882 [src:xen]

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 596765 xen-utils-common Bug #596765 [xen] xen: can't create a VM : no module named xmlproc Bug reassigned from package 'xen' to 'xen-utils-common'. No longer marked as found in versions xen/4.0.1-2 and xen/4.0.1-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #596765 to the same values previously set >

Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1~rc3-1 Severity: wishlist Please include pv-grub images in xen-utils or as a seperate package. Pv-grub allows securely booting guest kernels. [0] http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/PvGrub -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux

Il 27/04/2011 14:37, Ian Campbell ha scritto: > Which specific revision of qemu-xen-4.1 are you using? I'm using a tarball from http://bits.xensource.com/oss-xen/release/4.1.0/xen-4.1.0.tar.gz It seems Thomas used the tools/ioemu-qemu-xen subdirectory as source for xen-qemu-dm. At a first glance I didn't notice debian/mypatches/add-rules.patch: it adds Rules.mk from the tools

I noticed it by chance while digging into the code, I think it's a great news! Darkbasic

Hi, I continue the discussion from https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=19103 If T.38 reinvite detection should still work, why it doesn't? If I use faxdetect = t38 it does never detect the fax, even using alaw. Cheers, Darkbasic