similar to: Bug#439156: checked memory hole remapping, providing memory map

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Bug#439156: checked memory hole remapping, providing memory map"

2007 Aug 22
5
Bug#439156: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-amd64: large memory not detected
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-amd64 Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: important On a machine with 2 dual-core Opterons and 16GB of memory, only about 3GB is detected by the hypervisor. Transcript: root at thismachine:~# xm dmesg Xen version 3.0.3-1 (Debian 3.0.3-0-2) (ultrotter at debian.org) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061028 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-19)) Fri Nov 3 00:21:27 CET 2006 Latest
2007 Mar 02
3
3.0.4 ACPI support and Opteron 2210 ?
Hello, I originally posted this to xen-users, but someone suggested I post it here. I am having ACPI problems on a PenguinComputing Altus1600 system. It has 2x dual core Opteron 2210 processors. The system boots with a standard Debian or Ubuntu SMP kernel, with ACPI enabled. However the xen live cd, binary xen install, as well as my own custom compile of xen 3.0.4 from source will not boot.
2011 Jan 19
1
[BUG] Problem Booting Xen 4.0.1 on 2.6.32.26/27
Hello, I''m attempting to boot Xen 4.0.1 on a SuperMicro H8DGi-F motherboard and having not much luck. I can boot the 2.6.32.26 (or .27) kernels alone, but when I add Xen into the mix, I get consistent boot failure. I''ve tried Xen 4.0.1-release, 4.0.2-rc1-pre and 4.0.2-rc2-pre, all get the same failure. xen/next-2.6.37 works and boots great, but since netback isn''t
2013 Feb 20
8
crash in nvmx_vcpu_destroy
while doing "while xm migrate --live domU localhost;do sleep 1;done" I just got the crash shown below. And it can be reproduced. The guest has 2 vcpus and 512mb, it runs pvops 3.7.9 (XEN) ----[ Xen-4.3.26579-20130219.172714 x86_64 debug=n Not tainted ]---- (XEN) CPU: 14 (XEN) RIP: e008:[<ffff82c4c01dd197>] nvmx_vcpu_destroy+0xb7/0x150 (XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000010282
2013 Mar 12
0
Bug#702892: xen-hypervisor-4.0-i386: Early fatal page fault during Xen boot
Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-i386 Version: 4.0.1-5.8 Severity: normal Tags: upstream *** Please type your report below this line *** -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.7 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-686 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8,
2015 Dec 08
1
new install of Xen 4.6 hangs on Loading initial ramdisk
?Not sure if this actually made it to the list the first time.? Here is the SERIAL output (bottom of message after your questions).? Googling the error indicates it's something people ran into a few years back but was supposedly fixed.? Any ideas? I can verify that if I REMOVE the second CPU, it boots into Xen kernel no problem.? The CPU itself doesn't matter, as I can swap either
2010 Nov 16
0
Bug#603713: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64: amd64 Dom0-Kernel crashes in early boot-stage
Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: important The amd64 Dom0 crashes in early boot-stage. For debugging purpose I logged Kernel-Dump with minicom over Serial Console: System is: Dell Poweredge R710 2x Intel XEON X5650 96GB RAM Perc H200 SAS Controller 3x SAS-Drive I see a possible conjunction with Bug #600241 but acpi=off doesn't solve this problem. Regards,
2011 Feb 11
4
Xen hypervisor failed to startup when booting CPUs
Hi Folks: I run into a problem when enabling Xen in next generation server platforms with Xen c/s is 21380. Xen reported "CPU Not responding" when booting up 32 CPUs( 2 sockets with 8 cores/16threads total). The log files belonging showed something wrong with APCI. So I added x2apic=0 in the xen grub line, but the symptom remained. However, Native RHEL5.5 can
2012 Jul 27
4
3.5.0 dom0 crash on boot
Hi, I''ve not tried pv_ops for a long time but just got a new system (Supermicro X9DRL-iF) so decided to try 3.5.0 with the latest Xen 4.2-unstable, unfortunately the system crashes immediately after loading dom0: traps.c:486:d0 Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap [#6] on VCPU 0 [ec=0000] I''ve tried loading both bzImage and vmlinuz (gzip compressed vmlinuz) with the same
2004 Jul 26
0
FW: IA64 test report: 2.6.8-rc1 /tiger 2004-7-20: Boot Hang!
Originally, the test is on a tiger with RHEL installed. The fs is ext3 as default. Then the oops came up. I've installed the test kernel on another tiger with Suse, reiserfs as default. The kernel can boot successfully without any trouble. Is it a known issue? Or what causes this happen? thanks, -zhen -----Original Message----- From: Wang, Zhenyu Z Sent: 2004?7?20? 16:59 To: linux-ia64 at
2016 Feb 04
0
c7 xen-4.6 crash.
Installing xen on a fairly clean c7.2 system. I get a xen kernel panic. (XEN) Bad console= option 'tty' Xen 4.6.0-9.el7 (XEN) Xen version 4.6.0-9.el7 (mockbuild at centos.org) (gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4)) debug=n Wed Jan 20 12:25:53 UTC 2016 (XEN) Latest ChangeSet: Thu Jan 14 15:35:35 2016 +0000 git:6e8597a-dirty (XEN) Bootloader: GRUB 2.02~beta2 (XEN) Command line:
2020 Mar 02
1
[PATCH v1 01/11] ACPI: NUMA: export pxm_to_node
On Mon 02-03-20 14:49:31, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Will be needed by virtio-mem to identify the node from a pxm. No objection to export the symbol. But it is almost always better to add the export in the patch that actually uses it. The intention is much more clear that way. > Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael at kernel.org> > Cc: Len Brown <lenb at
2016 Feb 04
1
c7 xen-4.6 crash.
?I wrote about this a couple months back.? George asked me to submit to the Xen developers list, but I never had the time due to work demands on getting the new server set up.? In my case, I had to use a different server.? The new motherboard/CPU had no issues with the second CPU.? If you turn off and unplug the second CPU, it will work. Check the archives for my e-mail address and see
2017 Oct 30
3
[locking/paravirt] static_key_disable_cpuslocked(): static key 'virt_spin_lock_key+0x0/0x20' used before call to jump_label_init()
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 11:51:55PM +0100, Fengguang Wu wrote: >Hi Linus, > >Up to now we see the below boot error/warnings when testing v4.14-rc6. > >They hit the RC release mainly due to various imperfections in 0day's >auto bisection. So I manually list them here and CC the likely easy to >debug ones to the corresponding maintainers in the followup emails. >
2017 Oct 30
3
[locking/paravirt] static_key_disable_cpuslocked(): static key 'virt_spin_lock_key+0x0/0x20' used before call to jump_label_init()
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 11:51:55PM +0100, Fengguang Wu wrote: >Hi Linus, > >Up to now we see the below boot error/warnings when testing v4.14-rc6. > >They hit the RC release mainly due to various imperfections in 0day's >auto bisection. So I manually list them here and CC the likely easy to >debug ones to the corresponding maintainers in the followup emails. >
2019 Dec 13
0
[PATCH RFC v4 01/13] ACPI: NUMA: export pxm_to_node
On 12.12.19 22:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, December 12, 2019 6:11:25 PM CET David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Will be needed by virtio-mem to identify the node from a pxm. >> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw at rjwysocki.net> >> Cc: Len Brown <lenb at kernel.org> >> Cc: linux-acpi at vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: David
2020 Mar 02
0
[PATCH v1 01/11] ACPI: NUMA: export pxm_to_node
Will be needed by virtio-mem to identify the node from a pxm. Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael at kernel.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb at kernel.org> Cc: linux-acpi at vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com> --- drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
2010 Jun 22
1
The Host cpu(s) in this machine do not have support for full virtualization
Hi, I'm geting this message from virt-manager. Server: SuperMicro X8SIL with INTEL X3440 Here is my logs /var/log/dmesg: Bootdata ok (command line is ro root=/dev/md2) Linux version 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5xen (mockbuild at builder10.centos.org) (gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)) #1 SMP Thu May 13 13:49:53 EDT 2010 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: Xen: 0000000000000000 -
2013 Jul 04
2
Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/4] libxl: implement NUMA capabilities reporting
[Moving the conversation on @xen-devel and adding Jan, as that seems more appropriate] [Jan, this came up as I''m implementing some NUMA bits in libvirt but, as you see, the core of Jim''s question is purely about Xen] On lun, 2013-07-01 at 16:47 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On my non-NUMA test machine I have the cell memory reported as > > <memory
2005 Nov 22
1
gentoo as dom0 on xen fails...
I wanted to boot gentoo on xen, but it doesn''t work. What can I do? Booting ''Xen 3.0.0 / Linux 2.6.12.5'' root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83 kernel /xen.gz dom0_mem=131072 com1=115200,8n1 [Multiboot-elf, <0x100000:0x641cc:0x27e34>, shtab=0x18c078, entry=0x100000] module /vmlinuz-2.6.12.5-xen-0 root=/dev/md0