similar to: Bug#414471: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae: small bug in package description

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Bug#414471: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae: small bug in package description"

2006 Dec 10
2
Big machines support by Debian Xen
Hello people. I'm going to maintain a setup of several "big-resource" machines (>= 4 CPUs, >=8 Gb of ram), which should host large number of "small" systems in xen domains. As far as I understand, using "big machines" is not currently possible within debian xen packages, because there is no kernel with pae support to use in domain 0, which in turn
2008 Mar 13
3
Local network access to VPN
Hi, I have a linux box with vpn client. shorewall version 3.4.0 I can connect to a remote vpn network with the nortel vpn client. Can I allow local machines on my network to access remote vpn using Linux box as a gateway? Thanks and Regards Anuj ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges.
2010 Mar 19
6
noob question
Hi list, thank you for Shorewall :) I''m trying to get a simple config to work but i can''t seem to work out how to gain access via ssh to the protected remote machine. But that doesn''t surprise me really as i have just spend well over an hour to find how to limit the lograte AND fill in the logburst in shorewall.conf. I have specified a logfile (not messages) in
2007 May 28
3
Log questions
Hello, Can anyone tell me my shorewall is get hacked ? or local Lan computers got Virus ? please see the following log. http://www.wilson-kwok.com/shorewall.txt Please help --------------------------------- 現在你可輕易阻擋垃圾郵件,立即使用Yahoo! Mail 你就會相信! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
2008 Jun 18
8
Expanding SSHKnock shell script, a few questions please
Hi all, Another Debian Etch fan here, running shorewall (shell) 3.2.6-2 (and Yes I''m going to upgrade when Lenny goes stable). I already have the SSHKnock working, as documented on the website: http://www.shorewall.net/PortKnocking.html Thanks, works great! In addition to the knock to open 22, I want to also ADD a redirect, from 2222 to 22 on an internal box. So, when I knock on 1600
2007 Feb 27
4
Outgoing rules
Hi, How can only allow http,ftp,smtp define on outgoing rules ? Thanks _______________________________________ YM - 離線訊息 就算你沒有上網,你的朋友仍可以留下訊息給你,當你上網時就能立即看到,任何說話都冇走失。 http://messenger.yahoo.com.hk ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net''s Techsay panel and
2007 Dec 10
5
One interface rfc1918 address. Connection via DSL router
I have several computers connected to the internet through a DSL router that assigns rfc1918 (192.168.1.x) addresses to the systems connected. I have a server where shorewall is installed with one interface eth0, with a static ip (192.168.1.3). The router is configured to forward all connections from the internet to the linux server. I''d like to know how I can configure shorewall to
2007 May 25
49
Problem with ssh limit and scp stalling
Hi, I have a very simple server setup, using shorewall as my firewall. I have a line like this at the top of my rules file to allow ssh connections, but limited to 3 connection per minute with a burst rate of 3: SSH/ACCEPT net $FW - - - - 3/min:3 - Now when I have that in place, and from a remote machine run scp server:/some/file ., I find
2013 Mar 19
3
Splitting ports
Hello, Is it possible to split a port direction so it goes to one server or another? For example, I want abc.com to be routed to server X and def.com to go to server Y. Is it also possible to have e-mail addresses going to one server or another in the same concept so joe@abc.com will to server E and jane@abc.com goes to server F? If any of this is possible, what is the name of the
2008 Jul 05
1
Re: Shorewall-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 9
> > ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- > From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com> > To: shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:52:36 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Shaper > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:47:31PM -0500, RokeFeler wrote: > > Saludos, Tengo 3 inferfaces eth0, eth1, eth2 > > eth0 - Net > > eth1 -
2013 Apr 15
6
Shorewall and OpenVSwitch on Debian
Hi, I have a machine with a Debian Stable installation that runs OpenVSwitch to connect a virtual machine on the same box. The machine is also running shorewall. The problem that I''m having is that shorewall try to run before openvswitch, this makes that shorewall fails because it can''t determine the IP of the virtual interface generated by openvswitch that start after
2007 Jun 07
0
Bug#423006: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae: Same problem here on testing
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Followup-For: Bug #423006 FYI, I experience the very same problem here. The machine reboots immediately after the error... I had to reboot outside xen to standard Linux kernel, and then it works... Hope this helps -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500,
2008 Mar 07
0
Processed (with 4 errors): Re: Bug#469811: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae: kernel BUG at drivers/xen/core/evtchn.c:481
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 469811 linux-2.6 Bug#469811: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae: kernel BUG at drivers/xen/core/evtchn.c:481 Bug reassigned from package `xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae' to `linux-2.6'. > forcemerge 410807 469811 Bug#410807: linux-2.6/etch xen support - kernel BUG at drivers/xen/core/evtchn.c:481 Bug#469811:
2006 Dec 01
3
demo cd 3.0.3 on non-pae machine
Hi all, Would it be possible to include support for a non-pae capable machines on the demo cd. The 3.0 version worked but the 3.0.3 version fails with Cannot execute PAE-enabled kernel on a PAE-less CPU! (Please CC me since I am not subscribed to the list) Thanks, -- Adriaan Peeters _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
2007 May 09
2
Bug#423006: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae: /bin/sh : error while loading shared library libcrypt.so.1
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system I use Debian Sid and Xen 3.0.3-1, and recently after an apt-dist upgrade, i reboot my server and now when i restart the server, i receive these error : /bin/sh : error while loading shared library libcrypt.so.1 cannot open shared object file :no such file ... I reboot the
2011 Oct 19
5
Instalation of lastest version of Shorewall in Debian
I want to use lastest version of Shorewall in my fresh debian squeeze instalation, so I follow http://www.shorewall.net/Install.htm#Debian but, modify preferences file was not enough for me, I have to modify/add some other files in /etc/apt/ directory: 1.) include testing repo to source.list 2.) add APT::Default-Release "stable"; to apt.conf and pinning all other packages to stable
2007 Jul 23
0
Bug#434382: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386: Bogus Package Description
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386 Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: important Hi, i just figured out, that the kernel images like (xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686) are compiled with highmem (PAE) support. If there is a need for using XEN without PAE, the only way is to build a kernel-image manually. All kernel-images distributed by debian are build with highmem(PAE) support and wont work with a
2007 Jul 23
0
Processed: Re: Bug#434382: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386: Bogus Package Description
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 434382 xen-3.0 Bug#434382: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386: Bogus Package Description Warning: Unknown package 'xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386' Bug reassigned from package `xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386' to `xen-3.0'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system
2008 Mar 07
0
Bug#469811: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae: kernel BUG at drivers/xen/core/evtchn.c:481
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae Version: 3.0.3-0-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Hi! the error suddenly appeared when creating a domU using xm create <name> on our etch server The server freezes and isn't accessible via console/ssh anymore. The server is a Dell PowerEdge 2900 with 2 Quad-Core Xeon E5335 and 8Gb memory. pc307005:~# xm create -c
2006 Dec 28
1
Bug#404857: can't save domUs : not enough harddrive space
Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0.? debian etch : "i forgot to send a bugreport before doing an upgrade so i don't know exactli the version" when i do a shutdown of xen0 (halt or reboot system) by default it saves all my domUs, but if i don't have enough harddrive space to save the domUs' RAM xen doesn't detect it. And he try 1minute before writing a none