Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "make install"
2005 Apr 02
3
Bug#302744: logcheck-database: postfix rules
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.36
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I recently blew away my old logcheck-databse and lost a number of changes that i had made to postfix entries. The default database for postfix reports the
following errors that do not seem to be important...
Apr 2 13:00:19 terminus postfix/local[29516]: 574B9B3B9F: to=<doug at localhost>, relay=local, delay=13,
2004 May 26
5
Bug#251046: logcheck: invalid mktemp -p option
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.1.1-13.1woody1
Severity: important
logcheck line 56 uses "TMPDIR=$(mktemp -d -p ..." but mktemp from
woody doesn't accept -p option
Cheers, Chris
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux ethlife-a 2.4.26-vs1.27 #4 SMP Mit Apr 28 15:20:15 MEST 2004 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages logcheck depends on:
ii cron
2006 Jul 07
0
Bug#377276: "Did not receive identification string" warning reappeared
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.45
Severity: normal
Tags: patch pending confirmed
My bad, sorry.
--- rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/ssh 6 Jul 2006 10:16:41 -0000 1.18
+++ rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/ssh 7 Jul 2006 19:35:19 -0000
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ sshd\[[0-9]+\]: refused connect from [:[:alnum:].]+ \([:[:alnum:].]+\)$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11}
2010 Nov 05
0
Bug#602494: logcheck runs filters for packages not installed
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.3.13
Severity: normal
Hi, at present my logcheck is into 33 minutes of cpu time for
running the ignore/innd rule, when the innd package is not installed.
If running logcheck against only locally created logfiles, there should
be a configuration option to only run logcheck against installed (or
non-purged) packages.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
2007 Aug 25
0
Bug#412201: [PATCH] Squashed commit of the following:
commit 81496d0cf7b161bf981d51f0b96f860d68f3f6e3
Author: Micah Anderson <micah at debian.org>
Date: Fri Aug 24 17:51:31 2007 -0400
Enable alternate temporary directory to be set in the configuration file
On servers where the logfiles are very large and grow quickly, the
logcheck processes may run into space issues in /tmp resulting in the
email such as the following to be
2012 Jan 27
1
Bug#657641: /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 100: kill: (31667) - No such process
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.3.14
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
I keep getting these messages logged, when under high load.
This patch should clean that up.
commit 72661acccafa519fcb48a6a756e5c35d96e7511d
Author: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn at axis.com>
Date: Fri Jan 27 16:08:33 2012 +0100
Workaround for error:
/usr/sbin/logcheck: line 100: kill: (31667)
2008 May 26
0
problem to run logcheck
Hello
I try to execute logcheck from a php page. So I have create a php page with a
button which allow to run logcheck like this : /usr/sbin/logcheck -o >
/var/log/logcheck
(I want to put the result in a file logcheck, that's why I use the option -o)
I have put www-data in the groupe adm : "adduser www-data adm"
And after if I run logcheck like this for exemple:
2005 May 20
0
logcheck error, logtail output
Hello,
I'm having this error:
Warning: If you are seeing this message, your log files may not have
been
checked!
Details:
Could not run logtail or save output
Check temporary directory: /tmp/logcheck.EIX3jp
declare -x HOME="/var/lib/logcheck"
declare -x LANG="en_US"
declare -x LANGUAGE="en_US:en_GB:en"
declare -x LOGNAME="logcheck"
declare -x
2011 Mar 07
0
Bug#617232: logcheck: ignore regexes match ipv4 addresses only, causing false positives with ipv6 addresses.
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.3.13
Severity: normal
Various files under ignore.d.* use "[0-9.]{7,15}" to match an IPv4
address, e.g., a connection to rsyncd. However, this does not match
IPv6 addresses, causing spurious reports.
A better regexp might be something like: ([0-9.]{7,15}|[0-9a-f:]{2,39})
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990,
2003 Nov 09
1
Solved: Samba 3 w/ADS on Slackware
Hi folks:
We have finally solved the problem. We have figured out how to correctly
install Samba 3 with Active Directory Support on Slackware (and presumably on
any other non-RPM based distro).
The howto has been published on my website. Please visit
http://www.rongage.org/manual_samba_howto.html for the step-by-step
instructions on how to manually install Samba 3 from scratch with Active
2007 Jun 26
0
Bug#429384: logcheck: Logcheck depends on mktemp
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.56
Followup-For: Bug #429384
I get the following message in my e-mail from cron: Cron <logcheck at entercom>
if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logcheck; fi
/usr/sbin/logcheck: line 645: mktemp: command not found
/usr/sbin/logcheck: line 646: mktemp: command not found
rm: too few arguments
Try `rm --help' for more information.
2006 Jan 09
0
Re: Logcheck-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1
The entry is probably not igored because of
the word deny in your path .
You might better set your rule in violation.ignore.d/ directory.
At 13:00 09/01/2006, you wrote:
>Send Logcheck-users mailing list submissions to
> logcheck-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
2008 Jul 21
1
merging violations.ignore.d/logcheck-* into ignore.d.*/*
Hi guys, now that violations.d/logcheck is empty,
violations.ignore.d/logcheck-* are useless and many messages that
were previously elevated and filtered there now turn up as system
events. Thus, I went ahead and merged violations.ignore.d/logcheck-*
into ignore.d.*/* in the viol-merge branch.
http://git.debian.org/?p=logcheck/logcheck.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/viol-merge
Unless I hear
2005 Mar 16
1
Bug#299810: logcheck: grep errors after latest update
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.35
Severity: normal
I'm getting the following on two different Unstable boxen:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Cron <logcheck at bandit-hall> if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then
nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logcheck; fi
2006 May 21
2
Bug#368313: logcheck-database: new postfix violations ignore rule
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.39
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I'd like to add the following rule to /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-postfix :
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd?\[[0-9]+\]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\]: 554 <[._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\]>:
2012 Mar 02
1
Bug#661912: logcheck: files with period in ignore rule dirs ignored
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.3.14
Severity: normal
I added a local.rules file to ignore.d.server and then ran logcheck. The file was not used during the run.
Renaming it to local-rules got the file used during the next run.
Fix: periods should be allowed in filenames, or the fact that they are forbidden expressly documented inteh logcheck README.
Thanks
Nils
-- System Information:
Debian
2006 Oct 06
0
Bug#391458: logcheck: Please provide a way to configure niceness of log scanning process
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.47
Severity: wishlist
I'm running logcheck with an extended set of regular expressions on a
desktop system. The CPU load of this system is normally very low, around
3%-5%. When logcheck starts scanning the logs, the CPU usage increases
to 100% for several minutes and working on the system becomes difficult.
I would therefore be very happy about if a
2008 Dec 29
1
cannot run logcheck
Hello, list!
I can't run logcheck. This is the first time my system has not let me run
something, any way I try.
I am member of sudo group. I run this
sudo -u logcheck logcheck -o -t
and get
Sorry, user [user] is not allowed to execute '/usr/sbin/logcheck -o -t' as
logcheck on [machine].
If I try
su -s /bin/bash -c "/usr/sbin/logcheck -o -t" logcheck
I get
2007 Sep 14
2
Bug#442244: logcheck-database: should include the filters from cyrus-imapd-2.2
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.54
Severity: normal
The included filters for cyrus (/etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/cyrus) are very minimal. The cyrus-imapd-2.2 has a more
extensive ruleset (there's a /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/cyrus2_2 file in that package).
Please copy over the filters from cyrus-imapd-2.2. I'm running logcheck on a loghost, which doesn't run cyrus
2004 Jun 13
2
Bug#149567: logcheck: wish it could split reports to multiple people
hello russel,
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, russell at coker.com.au wrote:
..
> I would like to be able to have different parts of the report sent to
> different people. For example if I install a new daemon on a server
> I want the messages for that daemon going only to me (not the entire
> admin team) until I get it working properly. Otherwise excessive
> spurious messages lead