similar to: Missing/Wrong ignore.d for pureftp

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.34 Severity: normal the ignore.d.server pattern for courier 'imaplogin: DISCONNECTED' does not match the following line: Feb 12 16:19:47 backup imaplogin: DISCONNECTED, user=example at example.com, ip=[::ffff:111.111.111.111], headers=14013, body=0, time=1 This line should be ignored like the other DISCONNECTED messages. Or am I wrong? -- System

<nitpickyness> To avoid possible confusion, shouldn't this be named logcheck-pureftpd, or logcheck-pure-ftpd (instead of logcheck-pureftp)? Or is there a reason (that I've missed) it's this way? </nitpickyness> -j -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This

A new archive was announced for packages that have need for frequent changes [see below]. In theory, we should not have to update logcheck rules in Sarge, because we know that it's packages, with the exception of security updates will remain constant. This does not change the fact that we may wish to update the database on sarge <: Any thoughts? -Todd ----- Forwarded message from

Hello all thanks for the open source project!!!! I'm campus network administrator and I try to implement single-sign on with auth backend using mysql database!!! I have searched server that we need that using mysql as auth module for *nix and windows desktop and found : mail server --> qmail + vpopmail+mysql ftp server --> pureftp + mysql proxy server --> squid+mysql domain logon \

I upgraded to 1.2.28, same results. Here are the rules I added. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ perdition\[[0-9]+\]: Connect: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pure-ftpd: [^[:space:]]+ \[NOTICE\] ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pure-ftpd: [^[:space:]]+ \[INFO\] ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ exact\[[0-9]+\]: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ slapd\[[0-9]+\]: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11}

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.34 Severity: normal the patterns for pure-ftpd in ignore.d.server are not matching a user with a trailing whitespace. here a some examples: Feb 18 13:02:33 web1 pure-ftpd: (stupid-pure-ftpd @84.56.131.73) [NOTICE] /example/example.txt downloaded (5908 bytes, 152196.03KB/sec) Feb 18 13:16:14 web1 pure-ftpd: (stupid-pure-ftpd @84.56.131.73) [INFO] Logout. every

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal The rule for SSH ignoring "Bad protocol version identification" assumes there are no single quotes inside the version string ('[^']'). I am however getting mails including those lines: Mar 25 22:57:04 Debian-60-squeeze-64-minimal sshd[12144]: Bad protocol version identification

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.8 Severity: wishlist HI, can you please create a rule/some rules for amavis(d-new). I get for every mail this mesage: May 25 19:55:40 data amavis[9603]: (09603-15) Passed CLEAN, [::1] [213.165.64.22] <xxx at yyy.zz> -> \ <aaa at localhost>, Message-ID: <20100525175015.29677page1 at mx002.bbb.ccc>, mail_id: MM7upJv6se1Z, \ Hits:

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal Tags: patch After upgrading to debian squeeze I get several messages a day in the form of: Jul 2 15:05:15 hostname spamd[21286]: spamd: handled cleanup of child pid [28609] due to SIGCHLD: exit 0 This is due to an update in spamd, that makes the message more detailed (includes exit code)[1]. Therefore messages including exit code 0

hello logcheck team, is there a reason why no dhclient patterns are provided in ignore.d.workstation? in ignore.d.server there are all necessery pattern for dhclient, but a workstation typicaly uses dhcp an those messages reported by logcheck are annoying. are there any good reasons not to include dhclient patterns in ignore.d.workstation or are they simply missed? thank you for any feedback!

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.54 When Postfix is configured to listen on port tcp/587 by uncommenting the "submission" line in the postfix master.cf, logcheck does not ignore the anvil statistics log entries - attached is a patch from the current SVN trunk. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logcheck_1531.diff Type: text/x-patch Size:

Anyone got a clue about this: Server: DELL EdgeServer 2550 with PERC RAID card RH 7.3. Interestingly it happen with PureFTP and then started to hang socket connections until the box hung.. (or was it something else - maybe I have it backwards... that's why I'm comming to you guys..) Log entry in /var/log/messages: Jul 16 01:45:34 ETG3 kernel: <0>Assertion failure in

Hi everybody, let us assume i have the following matrixX and vectorY matrixX <- runif(100) dim(matrixX) <- c(10,10) vectorY <- as.matrix(as.character(seq(1,10))) if I define: subsample<-c("2") i can extract the rows from matriX based on the elements in vectorY which are listed in subsample matrixX[vectorY==subsample] if I define subsample with more than 1 element, such

package: logcheck-database version: 1.2.23 severity: wishlist The current regexp's for postfix/lmtp.. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/lmtp\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9A-F]: to=<[^[:space:]]+>, orig_to=<[^[:space:]]+>, relay=[^[:space:]]+\], delay=[0-9]+ status=sent \(250 2\.1\.5 Ok\)$ ..doesn't catch these messages: Jul 15 17:15:16 lorien postfix/lmtp[17151]: C1170480008B:

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.20a Severity: serious Tags: patch On a system where sh points to dash and LANG=es_ES, I get this: # apt-get -y --reinstall install logcheck Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0% Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0% Leyendo lista de paquetes... 23% Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0% Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0% Creando ?rbol de

I have Asterisk setup in a SOHO environment. I have 2 X100P cards at Zap/1 and Zap/2. I have 1 TDM400P card with Zap/3 - Zap/5. I have subscribed to callwaiting, callerid and calleridcallwaiting from Qwest on the 2 PSTN lines - Zap/1 and Zap/2. My problem is when I'm in an active call to the outside thru Zap/1 or Zap/2, I can't pickup the incoming callwaiting call. I can see the

Hi, The other day I went to my friend''s company where her local LAN IP was 37.0.0.8 I was pretty shocked since that IP is not for internal use. So, I asked her system admin about it and he muttered something about classless IP range and went off. Was he right in giving such a range to internal IPs? Also, the netmask was 255.255.255.0 and the default gateway was 37.0.1.x. Is this

Hey gang, I was wondering if all that documentation could or has been put into PDF format. I usually like to download documentation and read it while I''m sitting comfortably at home and I don''t want to tie up the phone line all night. Thanks, Nino p.s. If so, please feel free to attach the PDF formatted document to my e-mail ;-)

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Bryan Keiren < bryan.keiren at guerrilla-games.com> wrote: > We are indeed trying to completely clean the heap before exiting main(). > Which means that you either don't have threads, or you join all threads before main exits. Is that the case? Good for you if so! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Caldarale, Charles R

Can I play an .SPX on a MAC? How? Best regards, John T. Corsaut Principal/CD MATRiXX Marketing & Design, LLC 1682 Village Green Crofton, MD 21114 Voice/cell: 410-456-5281 Faxx: 410-451-6677 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20080225/b2d7b014/attachment.htm