similar to: Bug#269959: logcheck-database: courier ignore.d.server contains word from violations.d list

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.26 Severity: wishlist Please add ignore for Spamassasin's "check" messages like: Aug 16 19:27:54 ns spamd[23853]: checking message <20040816150710.86ADA708A8 at smtp-out.hotpop.com> for nobody:65534. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26.20040601 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL

Accepted: logcheck-database_1.2.27_all.deb to pool/main/l/logcheck/logcheck-database_1.2.27_all.deb logcheck_1.2.27.dsc to pool/main/l/logcheck/logcheck_1.2.27.dsc logcheck_1.2.27.tar.gz to pool/main/l/logcheck/logcheck_1.2.27.tar.gz logcheck_1.2.27_all.deb to pool/main/l/logcheck/logcheck_1.2.27_all.deb logtail_1.2.27_all.deb to pool/main/l/logcheck/logtail_1.2.27_all.deb Announcing to

Package: logcheck-database Severity: normal Tags: patch The rules in /etc/ignore.d/server/nagios contain the explicit version number "2". Now that lenny includes nagios3, those rules don't work anymore. Please change the rules to work for both nagios2 and 3. That can easily be done by replacing the 2 by (2|3) for example. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT

AFAICT our current version does not correspond to any version in the Linux history. This commit resynchronised to the state in Linux commit 598bae70c2a8e35c8d39b610cca2b32afcf047af. Differences from upstream: find_cpio_data is __init, printk instead of pr_*. This appears to fix Debian bug #785187. "Appears" because my test box happens to be AMD and the issue is that the (valid) cpio

Package: logcheck Version: 1.1.1-13.1woody1 Severity: important logcheck line 56 uses "TMPDIR=$(mktemp -d -p ..." but mktemp from woody doesn't accept -p option Cheers, Chris -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux ethlife-a 2.4.26-vs1.27 #4 SMP Mit Apr 28 15:20:15 MEST 2004 i686 unknown Versions of the packages logcheck depends on: ii cron

Hi all, After applying some updates onto a Debian web server, I rebooted it. However it will no longer start, and generates this error in XenCenter: 22/12/2011 09:57:45 Error: Starting VM ''Web Server'' - Using <class ''grub.GrubConf.Grub2ConfigFile''>; to parse /boot/grub/grub.cfg - WARNING:root:Unknown directive load_video - WARNING:root:Unknown directive

On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 13:31 +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 08:26:42AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > >Here's an idea. First extract the real initrd from the back half of the > >initrd: > > ijc at dagon:tmp$ cat /boot/initrd.img | ( cpio -t >&2 ; cat ) > initrd.real > > kernel > > kernel/x86 > >

Hi, please excuse my poor englisch. Is it possible to connect a (privat Test-Asterisk) to my privat ISDN and allow him to only answer one dialed number? We have 3 up to 10 Numbers on each (Euro-)ISDN (2 b-chanels), it cant't be done by the last Digits cause the numbers are completely different. For Example: I have 3 Numbers (641717, 928752....) Is it possible to tell Asterisk (in

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.32 Severity: normal It seems when someone runs a sudo command on my system, logcheck misses it. The second line of /etc/logcheck/violations.d/sudo matches them, but the /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-sudo kills them. Furthermore, when users run commands like '$ sudo rm *' in a directory with lots of files, we reports with lines like: Jan 13

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.5 Severity: normal Hi, I was having a look at logcheck and why I received a "verification failed: Temporary failure in name resolution" as a _system_ message. Turns out that since violations.d/logcheck is empty now, most of the rules in violations.ignore.d look quite useless, can you confirm? I suspect that a big part of those rules should be

Hi, I tried using rsyncX which is a GUI front end for rsync and as it turns out, the installer downgraded the current version from version 2.6.3 protocol version 28 to version 2.6.6 protocol version 27. I would like to learn more about how to get a newer version of rsync installed. Where would be a good place for a beginner to start? Thanks Much, Scott G.

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.69 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, I think that this rule: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ su\[[0-9]+\]: (\+|-) (pts/[0-9]{1,2}|tty[0-9]) [_[:alnum:]-]+:[_[:alnum:]-]+$ is supposed to filter out lines like: Oct 17 14:49:24 myhost su[13469]: + /dev/pts/1 user1:root It is not working because the pattern dos not include the "/dev/" part and

Hi guys, now that violations.d/logcheck is empty, violations.ignore.d/logcheck-* are useless and many messages that were previously elevated and filtered there now turn up as system events. Thus, I went ahead and merged violations.ignore.d/logcheck-* into ignore.d.*/* in the viol-merge branch. http://git.debian.org/?p=logcheck/logcheck.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/viol-merge Unless I hear

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.39 Severity: wishlist Hi, I'd like to add the following rule to /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-postfix : ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd?\[[0-9]+\]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\]: 554 <[._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\]>:

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.62 Severity: normal File: /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-ssh Somewhere between etch and now, ssh stopped reporting failed passwords as "error: PAM: Authentication failure for foo", and switched to "Failed password for foo", similar to what it already did for unknown users, but without the "invalid user" part.

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.63 Severity: normal Given that violations.d/logcheck has been emptied by 2394562ab4a13c4510c671f01ffc8f35e97f1cd3, shouldn't most of violations.ignore.d be moved to one of ignore.d.*? AIUI, all of these are currently rendered useless. (I'll gladly lend a hand; I just want to make sure this is the right thing to do.) -- System Information: Debian

<nitpickyness> To avoid possible confusion, shouldn't this be named logcheck-pureftpd, or logcheck-pure-ftpd (instead of logcheck-pureftp)? Or is there a reason (that I've missed) it's this way? </nitpickyness> -j -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This

**OFF TOPIC** but perhaps of interest to some on this list. I apologize in advance to those who may be offended. The byline: ******************************** "ChatGPT's odds of getting code questions correct are worse than a coin flip But its suggestions are so annoyingly plausible" ************************************* from here:

Package: xen-system-amd64 Version: 4.6.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I installed fresh from ALPHA5, no UEFI, with two disks. Each disk got a partition for /boot and one for /, joined each by RAID 1. Then I just installed "xen-system-amd64", nothing more. After rebooting, selecting on grub to boot XEN, it hangs on mdadm: no devices

Hi I couldn''t figure out, how to create a drop-down list with Markaby. How would I create something like this: <select name="character"> <option value="marvin">Marvin the paranoid Android</option> <option value="arthur">Arthur Dent</option> <option value="zaphod">Zaphod