similar to: Kill invertor on Powercom 1000VA

Hi Johan, The driver is expecting either 'ACK' or no reply at all in case of success and the command itself echoed back in case of errors. On the other hand, your UPS replies '(ACK' in case of success and '(NAK' on failure. So.. when the driver first tries to stop pending shutdowns and you get the 'operation not permitted' error, the driver interprets it as a

Hi, There seems to be a problem turning of the inverter on a Mecer online 1000VA UPS. OS: Debian Wheezy Nut: Installed via apt - version 2.6.4-2.3 Debug output from driver. root at proxmox1:~# /lib/nut/blazer_usb -DDDDD -a mecer -k Network UPS Tools - Megatec/Q1 protocol USB driver 0.08 (2.6.4) 0.000000 send_to_all: SETINFO driver.parameter.port "auto" 0.000023

Hi, They say one should never argue with people that know more than you, so please bear with me. On 2013/10/24 09:47 PM, hyouko at gmail.com wrote: > The driver is expecting either 'ACK' or no reply at all in case of > success and the command itself echoed back in case of errors. > On the other hand, your UPS replies '(ACK' in case of success and > '(NAK' on

Dear Charles and Artem, I've recently bought a new PowerCom Imperial IMD825-AP LCD which identifies itself as 0x0d9f:0x0004. At first glance it seems that usbhid-ups driver works fine. But when I tried to shutdown UPS via DelayBeforeShutdown it started double beeping every couple seconds for indefinite time (the same problem described by Vincenzo Colonnella here:

Hi Charles, > Sigh, I wish the vendors wouldn't change operation without changing identifiers. > > Do you have any recommendations on how the driver should decide whether it is an old 0x0004 or new 0x0004 device? No-no, there is no an old 0x0004 or new 0x0004 device, I guess that we have to handle general case for all 0d9f:0x0004 devices. From PCM_USB_LIST_device2014.pdf attached

Dear Sirs, We appreciate your support and cooperation. Can you please kindly add our new USB-controller with productID 0X04 to NUT compatible list. Updated USB-controller compatible with previous version which is supported by your usbhid-ups driver. Detailed information regarding new POWERCOM communication protocol you could download via link

Dear Sirs, First of all I would like to thank you for support PCM product in your project. Kindly please be informed that POWERCOM launch new USB-controller with productID 0X04. Updated USB-controller compatible with previous version which supported by your usbhid-ups driver. There is added some command and changed idProduct. Vendor ID stay the same 0X0d9f without changes. Detailed information

On Nov 11, 2014, at 3:30 PM, Maksym Bodaniuk <max.bodaniuk at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Charles and Artem, > > I've recently bought a new PowerCom Imperial IMD825-AP LCD which identifies itself as 0x0d9f:0x0004. > At first glance it seems that usbhid-ups driver works fine. But when I tried to shutdown UPS via DelayBeforeShutdown it started double beeping every couple seconds

On Nov 12, 2014, at 3:53 AM, Maksym Bodaniuk <max.bodaniuk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Charles, > >> Sigh, I wish the vendors wouldn't change operation without changing identifiers. >> >> Do you have any recommendations on how the driver should decide whether it is an old 0x0004 or new 0x0004 device? > > No-no, there is no an old 0x0004 or new 0x0004

Hi, I know it's been a topic many times here, but I've searched the archives, googled for days, and I simply don't believe, that there is still no solution to this. I'm using a PowerCom BNT-600AP ups with usb port. I've downloaded the latest version from svn, compiled it, and tried to use it: * megatec(_usb) - no luck, it did not find the UPS (I?ve read in this list, that

Hi Have been trying to get nut and Powercom Vanguard 2000 ups communicating ? in the /lib/udev/rules.d/52-nut-usbups.rules file we have this entry #? PowerCOM VGD - Vanguard? - usbhid-ups ATTR{idVendor}=="0d9f", ATTR{idProduct}=="0004", MODE="664", GROUP="nut" ? In the /etc/ups/ups.conf [UPS] ??????? driver = usbhid-ups ??????? port =

please subscribe to the nut user mailing list ( http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser) and post the output of "/path/to/usbhid-ups -DDDDD -a <your_ups_name_in_ups.conf>" cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer -

Hello. I've been trying to got it work but haven't luck. I'm using NUT 2.6.0-1 under Windows XP with libusb driver installed (USB\VID_0D9F&PID_0004&REV_0001). I had tryed all options with such config: *PWCOM] driver = usbhid-ups port = auto vendorid = 0d9f desc = "Powercom BNT-800AP" type=BNT* * *Here is output from CMD:*

Hi, I have the following setup. Office A - Windows 2003 DC Office B - Samba 3.4.5 domain member I want users in Office B to still be able to access files on the Samba domain member when the link between Office A and Office B does down. I have enabled "winbind offline logon". If I now break the link between Office A and Office B. All work as expected. (I did not test longer than

On Sep 11, 2014, at 2:50 AM, Khokhlov Artem <khokhlov.a at pcm.ru> wrote: > Can you please kindly add our new USB-controller with productID 0X04 to NUT compatible list. Updated USB-controller compatible with previous version which is supported by your usbhid-ups driver. Confused. This commit was added in 2011:

Greetings all, Anyone done any work on these products? I have several (a couple of different models) that are rebranded Ultra in the US. Using explore with usbhid returns some significant quantities of data and I've done some captures with usbsnoop. I've also asked Ultra to get me the HID definition that was used for them, in the hopes I don't have to usbsniff all the setting

Yeah, I have its datasheet (it's a Xantrex XW invertor by the way). I do not know why creating a more-or-less generic driver is an issue. Of course, there are Modbus beasts that can scare everyone but mostly one would need to read either intreger or float numbers out of Modbus registers in order to decide whether or not to start or stop the shutdown process. 24 ???? 2017 ?. 19:25:14

Hello, I would like to run nut 2.6.1 on an embeeded machine ( arm9 ) running linux and uclibc. A working gcc tool chain came with the board. How can I compile and build nut using the cross compiler tool chain ? I know that this is not a very specific question. I have however little experience with cross compiling, and I wonder where to start. A logical point would be the configure script. It

Hello, I've had this same model CyberPower connected to a linux server and a freebsd server. [root at sensor003 menon]# lsusb Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 004: ID 0764:0501 Cyber Power System, Inc. CP1500 AVR UPS Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20070205/5ad69acc/attachment.pgp