Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "DAHDI 2.2.1, Asterisk 1.6.2.6 - Channel unacceptable (6)"
2010 Jan 13
0
asterisk / NEC2400 / PRI
Hello List
I'm trying to figure out what is wrong between my asterisk and my NEC 2400
pbx
We have been trying to link them with a spare PA-24DTG
from the NEC, I'm able to call an extension on the Asterisk, however the
extension rings, and then immediatly hangs up
I traced it back to the debug of the PRI on the Asterisk...
I would appreciate if anyone could pin point what is wrong
The
2010 May 24
0
zap calls are getting dropped (unexpected disconnect message)
Hello,
I have a problem, and I'm looking for you help.
When I dial certain number my calls are getting dropped.
I initiate the call, I hear IVR, then I am being transfered to
operator, and then suddenly I get ISDN DISCONNECT message.
I had this type of problem some time ago, and I thought it was a
problem on the other end. But now this is a second time it occurred
and I want an expert to
2009 Nov 30
1
DAHDI - BRI - Astribank
Hello List,
it is a very long time since I wrote here.... It has been still in
Zaptel times....
Today I am run into a related problem: I can't get a DAHDI setup to
work 100%. I am configuring an Astribank XR00013 (BRI, two ISDN ports).
At some degree the installation (latest DAHDI drivers, Asterisk
1.6.0.18 on Centos 5.x) works.
I can get incoming calls to the dialplan context that is
2010 Jun 22
0
SMS in landline
Hi all.
I am searching for a way to send SMS via our E1 PRI line.
We are in Portugal and I have seen some Internet/TV/Phone providers (ZON for
those who know it) who install normal phones with SMS support in landline.
So I just found a page from PT (Portugal Telecom) stating that the SMC
number is either 12999 or 129990 (
2010 Apr 12
2
PRI Gurus ONLY - Too complex of an issue
Hi Guys,
Full PRI installed in Canada with Sangoma A101DE and Asterisk 1.4.21.2,
LibPRI 1.4.10.
Placing a call into PRI and then transfering that call out to another
number. Problem is that the call rings out but the moment the other party
pickups both legs of the call are disconnected give Cause code 16.
2010 Apr 10
2
PRI - Native ZAP bridge fails - Is this my patch?
Hi Guys,
I am calling out 416-999-1111 on Channel 1 of PRI and then calling
416-999-2222 on Channel 2 of PRI. When the two channels are going to be ZAP
native bridged, both channels hangup and CLI show PRI cause (16).
Asterisk Verbose *(Channel 1 already connected to party)*:
-- Requested transfer capability: 0x00 - SPEECH
-- Called g0/4169992222
-- Zap/2-1 is proceeding passing it
2008 Sep 01
0
not able to make call to landline no...to mobile works fine
hi all
I have a PRI line which i have connected to my asterisk server. I am able to make calls to mobile no through my asterisk server, while i am not able to make calls to land line nos. This is strange. Where do u think the? problem is , is it from the service provider or? mis configuration of my asterisk. I am from India and using airtel pri lines. Below i am pasting you my configuration file
2010 Apr 13
0
PRI Gurus ONLY - Too complex of an issue - SOLVED
Told you it was too complex of an issue :-) I figured to do this in
zapata.conf and all is fine now:
transfer=no
That was the magic two letter which was sending a request for RLT feature on
the line. Set transfer to "no" and all worries gone.
Thanks for the input everyone.
-Bruce
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:10 PM, bruce bruce <bruceb444 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Futher check
2009 Oct 25
1
some issue with libpri cant go past 1.4.1
I have a working system with asterisk 1.4.26.2 libpri 1.4.1 and zaptel
1.4.12.1
With a digium TE205p.
I am trying to update to libpri 1.4.10.2. When I do, incoming calls work
but outgoing does not.
When I do this I "rm /usr/lib/libpri*" then just install libpri-1.4.10.2
as normal.
I then do a make clean in asterisk and make distclean ,then configure,
make and make install.
I do
2009 Nov 19
1
Type Of Number setting (pridialplan) is not effective
Hello,
I have an Asterisk system in the UK using ISDN service from BT.
My problem is that the called number is always passed to the provider with the Type Of Number declared as ?national? despite pridialplan (and prilocaldialplan) is set to ?unknown?.
My questions are:
- How can I find out what the effective value is for the above two variables without actually making a call? (I have very
2008 Jul 16
0
ISDN Call Droping only for outgoing
I have been trying to sort this out for a while now but with no luck
I have isdn <-> asterisk<-> pabx on a te205
incoming calls work fine
outgoing calls seem to work fine but the call is dropped when answered
I think it is to do with the line
[May 8 17:51:55] WARNING[4762] channel.c: Unexpected control subclass '5'
that is causing the problem but I don't know how to
2007 Nov 21
1
Problem dialing certain numbers with an E1 PRI
I have a server running Asterisk 1.4.14, Zaptel 1.4.6, Libpri-1.4.2 on
a CentOS 5 server. The server has a single TE110 card connected to a
provider called Alestra in Monterrey, Mexico. Since we installed
everything we have been having problems dialing certain numbers, those
numbers always fail when dialed from Asterisk but if you dial from your
cell phone they always go through. I once has a
2007 Jul 12
0
No subject
handled.
So....what do I do?
Thanks,
MD
=1===================================================
!! Invalid Protocol Profile field 0x11
-- Accepting call from '2004000' to '111' on channel 0/23, span 1
-- Executing NoOp("Zap/23-1", "Incoming call from Meridian1") in new
stack
-- Executing NoOp("Zap/23-1", " From number: 2004000|
2007 Jan 18
1
Passing video calls / bearer capability thru PRI
Hi all,
using latest asterisk-svn
I want to reflect an video call incoming via an PRI EuroISDN channel to
another outgoing PRI channel,
and I want the the outgoing channel to have the exact same bearer
capability
< Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer
capability: Unrestricted digital information (8)
< Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate:
2009 Mar 19
1
PRI QSIG Asterisk - Legacy PBX
I have a PRI E1 link between Asterisk 1.4.24 and Alcatel-Lucent OmniPCX Enterprise R9.0.
As EuroISDN it works fine.
However, I need to move to QSIG because of a firmware upgrade on the Alcatel PBX which doesn't support EuroISDN (please don't ask why).
Besides, I've read somewhere that 2 B Channel Transfers "should" work with * 1.4, the latest 1.4 libpri and QSIG.
So this
2010 Mar 29
1
is it possible to connect Digium TE420 and Cisco card?
Hello,
I'm having problem connecting my Asterisk 1.4.29.1 with Digium TE420 to
providers Cisco 2800 with VWIC-1MFT-E1 card.
the same card runs fine with another E1 provider.
TE420 led's lite green.
Message type: RELEASE COMPLETE (90)
< [08 02 80 ac]
< Cause (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) Spare: 0
Location: User (0)
< Ext: 1 Cause:
2009 Mar 26
2
PRI dropping #2
Hey,
I wrote yesterday about PRI dropping, which turned out to just be a
regular reset of unused B-channels. This time there's a real issue. As
noted earlier I have an ISDN-30 connection, a Digium TE-121 with
VPMADT032 echo cancellation. These are my configurations files:
== /etc/zaptel.conf
loadzone=dk
defaultzone=dk
span=1,1,0,css,hdb3,crc4
bchan=1-15
dchan=16
bchan=17-31
==
==
2009 Mar 24
4
PRI dropping
Hello,
I have an ISDN-30 connection and a Digium TE-121 with VPMADT032 echo
cancellation. Every 30-60 minutes I experience PRI dropping.
@@@ /etc/zaptel.conf:
loadzone=dk
defaultzone=dk
span=2,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
bchan=32-46
dchan=47
bchan=48-62
@@@
@@@ /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf
[channels]
switchtype=euroisdn
usecallerid=yes
group=2
signalling=pri_cpe
context=incoming
channel => 32-46
2007 Jul 12
0
No subject
picture. I know the firmware on the Nortel is old, so I'm guessing that
libpri is sending something that the Nortel does not know how to handle.
Is there a way to dumb down what libpri sends? From everything I've read
PRI is an evolving standard - and older devices may struggle with newer
extensions/developments. (This might be very handy for users trying to talk
to old pbx's.)
Is
2009 Jan 16
0
No subject
"RED: Loss of signal (LOS): The equipment shall assume "loss of
signal" when the incoming signal amplitude is, for a time duration of
at least 1 ms, more than 20 dB below the nominal amplitude. The
equipment shall react within 12 ms by issuing AIS."
This sounds like what is happening, and is in order with what one of
the technicians said - I was about 20 dB below their