Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "dahdi dies with "No more room in scheduler""
2007 Oct 06
9
Unusable performance over WAN (part 2)
Hi all,
Disregard my previous posts, I've consolidated everything here.
I'm having terrible performance issues with samba over a WAN
(point-to-point T1 link).
Doing a copy of a 2MB file from a samba server to a linux client
running smbclient takes over 5 minutes.
SCPing the same file takes seconds.
The server is running samba version 3.0.25c with kernel 2.6.16.18.
I've put up a set
2009 Jun 26
4
T38 Fax Gateway for Asterisk 1.6
Hi,
I remember seeing a T38 Gateway application for Asterisk 1.6 floating
around, but I can't seem to find it again.
Does anyone have any pointers to it? I really want to be able to send
an incoming T38 connection directly to the PSTN.
Thanks.
-- James
2008 Jun 06
2
Bad ringback tone on zap channel
Hi,
I've noticed that sometimes instead of getting a regular ring tone
when calling out on a Zap channel, I get this obnoxious loud noise
which forces me to hang up.
Is this a problem in the Zaptel driver? I seem to recall that ringback
tones are generated by zaptel when dialing out from a SIP phone over a
Zap trunk.
Thanks.
2010 Feb 12
1
PRI Problems with 1.6.0.10
Hi, I have a PRI problem where it appears that my system is not
responding to SETUP messages on a channel.
It seems to be retransmitting a significant number of RELEASE messages
to clear a call that is most likely
to be long gone.
This causes a huge issue because I get a bunch of hangup cause 102s (timeout).
I'm using a TE410P (1st Gen) as my PRI card.
Has anyone seen this at all?
Thanks.
2014 Nov 25
2
High resident memory with 11.14.0 ?
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Matthew Jordan <mjordan at digium.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:12 PM, James Lamanna <jlamanna at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Also, how big does the cache in frame.c grow to?
> > I've recompiled with MALLOC_DEBUG on that server:
> >
> > asterisk -rx "memory show summary"
> >
> > ....
> >
2008 Oct 22
7
Sonicwall potentially causing long ping times to SIP phones
Hi,
I'm having an issue where some phones behind a sonicwall are auto-congesting.
The status on "sip show peer" shows ping times anywhere from 80ms all
the way up to 1100ms.
PCs behind the same firewall have a ping time of about 30ms to the PBX itself.
Does anyone know if the sonicwall is inserting delay into the SIP
signaling path and lagging the OPTIONS messages for qualify?
2011 Dec 30
1
Asterisk 1.4.42 NOTIFY replies ignore NAT setting
Hi,
I've been trying to fix NOTIFY replies (specifically keep-alives) in 1.4.42
(I can't upgrade to 1.8.x at the moment for various reasons).
I've noticed for user agents that have a VIA header with a different
port than the port the NOTIFY was sent from,
the NOTIFY reply will always be sent back to that port, which is incorrect.
(Sonicwalls and other routers love to do this, even
2009 Aug 07
5
Asterisk in VMWare, how does it perform and what is the limit?
Hi,
I'm coming up with ideas about building a cluster of asterisk servers,
and am exploring the virtualization option.
I'm curious to know some real-world data about how many extensions a
VMWare install on good hardware could support.
I've seen stories about how the hypervisor timeslicing can wreak havoc
on call quality at some point.
Is this really the case? If so, what's a
2006 Feb 01
3
Increasing samba performance
Hi.
Between 2 linux (2.6.11 client and 2.6.14 server) machines connected by
a 100Mb link I get samba performance copying a file from the client to
the server through a smbmounted share of around 4.2MB/s
Is this to be expected? Or can it be improved (and if so, how?) I've
tried tweaking SO_(SND/RCV)BUF (after reading numerous articles on
samba performance...), but it doesn't seem to have
2009 Jun 04
6
Phones dropping registration, but asterisk thinks phones are still registered
Hi,
I have a serious problem with Asterisk 1.4.18.
Every so often, usually after Asterisk has been running for a few days
consistently, phones start dropping registrations.
However, when this happens, doing a "sip show peer" on those
extensions shows them as "OK".
Therefore, I have no way to tell this problem is happening until
customers start calling.
The only way to fix it is
2014 Nov 22
2
High resident memory with 11.14.0 ?
>
> Its up to 5.8G of resident memory with 28321 calls processed.
> The OOM killer is going to kill this soon at this rate (8GB RAM machine).
> This seems like a pretty serious problem.
> It looks like I'll need to restart asterisk every night....
Hi the number of cpu cores that you see with top times 512Mbyte is the
level of ram that's needed
e.g. a hp-gen8 with 2 octo
2009 Sep 18
1
No more room in scheduler
Hi,
I running into the following problem on my Asterisk setup:
--snip--
[Sep 3 01:40:59] NOTICE[9170] chan_dahdi.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort
(6) on Primary D-channel of span 3
[Sep 3 01:47:07] ERROR[9170] chan_dahdi.c: No more room in scheduler
[Sep 3 01:47:07] ERROR[9170] chan_dahdi.c: Asked to delete sched id -1???
[Sep 3 01:47:07] ERROR[9170] chan_dahdi.c: No more room in scheduler
[Sep
2008 Dec 05
2
All lines occupied notification from endpoint
Hi,
I've noticed that if I have a multi-line linksys (942 or 962) phone
with the same sip registration mapped to each line key, that if all
the lines are full the phone will accept another call. I would expect
the phone to respond with "busy" so the call would to directly to
voicemail.
Has anyone else experienced this and know of a workaround? I know it
seems like an
2009 Feb 07
2
Minimum version for asterisk and iaxmodem
Hi,
I'm trying to use iaxmodem against a very old version of asterisk
(1.0.7 - its a debian sarge embedded system),
yet when asterisk gets a call from iaxmodem, it says that the "format
for the call is unknown".
Does anyone know if there is a minimum version of asterisk that is
compatible with iaxmodem 1.1.0?
Thanks.
-- James
2009 Jan 28
1
asterisk-users Digest, Vol 54, Issue 94
> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:11:19 -0600
> From: "Danny Nicholas" <danny at debsinc.com>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP Registrations broken on 1.4.22.1?
> To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'"
> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Message-ID: <D32AD473FC574B41AE6A842E46549174 at db0005>
>
2006 Jan 11
2
Changing file permissions in Windows XP with a samba PDC
Question about changing file permissions in Windows XP when running
samba as a PDC.
If you hit Properties and go to the security tab, instead of listing
the proper group/user names it lists the full SID.
Is there a way to get Windows XP to map these to the proper user/group names?
I am using LDAP as a backend with Samba.
Thanks.
-- James
2008 Aug 15
1
Problem with Aastra 480ci and qualify=yes
Hi,
We have a few Aastra 480ci phones and we've noticed that in order to
get the phone to receive a call, qualify must be = no.
Apparently the Aastras do not respond to the qualify message (or
respond in a way Asterisk doesn't understand) and Asterisk thinks the
phone is unreachable.
However, this now prevents MWI from working properly on the phones.
Does anyone know how to get MWI
2014 Nov 24
2
High resident memory with 11.14.0 ?
Also, how big does the cache in frame.c grow to?
I've recompiled with MALLOC_DEBUG on that server:
asterisk -rx "memory show summary"
....
1780466242 bytes (1780181594 cache) in 2352909 allocations in file
frame.c
...
Seems like a ridiculous cache.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:02 AM, James Lamanna <jlamanna at gmail.com> wrote:
> cat /proc/cpuinfo lists 4 cores.
>
2009 Jan 28
2
SIP Registrations broken on 1.4.22.1?
Hi,
I had a Trixbox 1.4.18 that I "yum update"d to 1.4.22.1.
Now, I seem to have a huge problem with phones not staying registered
(registrations worked perfectly at 1.4.18).
I phone will register the first time I plug it in, and then once you
make a call and hangup (or sometimes even during the call)
all the lights will go orange meaning a lost registration. Every so
often the lights
2010 May 05
2
Registering a Cisco 7965 on 1.4.26
Hi,
I'm having a problem trying to get a Cisco 7965 phone registered on
Asterisk 1.4.26.
As we know, Cisco now, for security reasons, has made the phone ports
non-symmetric, in that it sends out UDP requests on a high port and
receives them on a different port.
It seems that, even with 'nat' set to 'no', that Asterisk is not
honoring the Contact header and keeps attempting to