similar to: AGI problem using mono (.Net)

1.2? 1.4? 1.6? 1.8? Thanks, - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks Inc CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+ Linux+, Network+, Server+ . www.impalanetworks.com P: (505) 327-7300 F: (505) 327-7545

Hi, I currently have some systems on AsteriskNOW 1.7 & have been happy with its clean simplicity & reliability. Are many people here using AsteriskNOW 2.0.x? How do you feel about it? Did Digium stick with their previous philosophy of keeping everything very vanilla & making it clean & simple for someone who understands how to manage CentOS, FreePBX, tftp, ntpd, etc. but

Any ideas on why callers who call into my customer's SIP trunk are not hearing a ringback tone? I had this on one other asterisk system, and wound up needing to set progressinband=yes in the SIP trunk config. I have set this on the current system & restarted asterisk, but to no avail. I am using: AsteriskNOW distro Asterisk build is 1.6 from AsteriskNOW repository:

Hi, We have clients with various security & compliance requirements. Although not required, it would be ideal to have messages encrypted at rest. We already use SSL/TLS to secure the transmission of most email. However, it would be nice to have them encrypted sitting on our server. Is anyone doing this? I think that ideally, rather than full-disk encryption, we should use an encryption that

Hello everyone. I am wondering whether there is a certain technique I should use to identify all log lines in the asterisk/full logfile that are related to a single call. If a user reports that something strange happened with a certain call, I'd like to be able to easily go back and look at the asterisk/full logfile, and look at only the lines that are relevant. I am having some difficulty

This morning on our newly built server, the following was logged twice: auth: Error: pam(username,127.0.0.1): pam_authenticate() failed: Authentication failure (/etc/pam.d/dovecot missing?) This also happened to be during a time of 100+ imap-login processes, where we were seeing: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped The initial error

Hello all, I have been running asterisk systems since summer of 2008. I do not claim to be an expert. But I have worked through many issues during this period. I have setup & manage 5 systems, which serve 6 companies total (and of course process calls for all of the people they do business with). I have always been happy with asterisk (well, obviously less happy during the problem times...

Now that we've hashed out some thoughts on the most stable version of asterisk, I'd like to ask the question as to why I should NOT use 1.8? What are specific reasons? For instance a few days back I was speaking with James at Rhino Equipment. He said that he has "no real data" on why I shouldn't use 1.8. They just follow a practice of not jumping on the newest version. But I

I just had a user report that they called out to someone on a cell phone this morning, and after a short conversation, the call was dropped/lost. The person on the cell phone says that this is very rare, and would not suspect the dropped/lost call to be on their side. I have looked at the asterisk/full log as thoroughly as I can, and have pasted the lines which seem relevant to that call below.

Today I found out we are having users w/ problems because: Mar 3 09:57:33 jlgray dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped Mar 3 09:58:42 jlgray dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped Mar 3 10:02:51 jlgray dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login):

Today I found our dovecot 2.x gracefully logged: dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped I am confident that we had the very same problem on our previous dovecot 1.x box. Of course with dovecot 1.x, the same relative setting is login_max_processes_count. I believe that I turned up all dovecot logging & debugging to the max

n active project, than a dead one. Otherwise who is going to patch vulnerab= ilities? Not me. I'm not a software developer. - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks P: 505.327.7300 . From: Steve Totaro [mailto:stotaro at totarotechnologies.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:11 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] What

with an active project, than a dead one. Otherwise who is going to patch vulnerabilities? Not me. I'm not a software developer. - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks P: 505.327.7300 . From: Steve Totaro [mailto:stotaro at totarotechnologies.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:11 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users]

I am wondering if anyone knows of a way to do this, as it would be much more meaningful for our CDR reports. We use FreePBX under the Elastix distro. We are able to set the CALLER's CID on inbound calls by using the "Asterisk Phonebook" module in FreePBX, then configure the Inbound Route settings to use it for CID. I haven't seen anything like this to apply those same rules to

1. Does "Wrap-Up-Time" apply to all queue agents/extensions that just rang,= or only the one who actually answered the call (I assume the latter)? 2. Does the "Member Delay" delay the ringing of new calls to agents, or onl= y come into play AFTER the agent answers the ringing call? Any other suggestions for how I can resolve this issue? I am wondering whet= her "Agent

Every so often, I have an asterisk 1.4.22-4 system that goes into an endless loop with the following: [Jun 1 13:30:44] VERBOSE[13160] logger.c: -- Playing 'dir-nomatch' (escape_digits=) (sample_offset 0) [Jun 1 13:30:44] WARNING[13160] file.c: Failed to write frame [Jun 1 13:30:44] WARNING[13160] file.c: Failed to write frame [Jun 1 13:30:44] VERBOSE[13160] logger.c: -- Playing

What are the pros and cons of both? Especially in regards to performance, stability, management & maintenance? I really appreciate feedback. We're on a time-crunch to migrate from a debian 5 box w/ dovecot 1.1 to a debian 6 box w/ dovecot 2.0.9 (built from source). Thanks, - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks Inc CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+ Linux+, Network+, Server+ .

On 28.09.2014 22:22, flavio wrote: > I follow your tutorial untill this instruction: > > wget "http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/libusb/libusb-1.0/libusb- > 1.0.18/libusb-1.0.18.tar.bz2? > r=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.libusb.org%2F&ts=1404210716&use_mirror=softlayer-ams" > -O libusb-1.0.18.tar.bz2 > > in my opiniono there are 2 " that are not needed and

Anybody have any thoughts on the Linux+ certification?

On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Kristian Rasmussen <kristian_rasmussen at fastmail.co.uk> wrote: > The entire command should be on one continuous line, and the double > quotes need to stay. I probably should have posted this as a pastebin link to retain carriage returns and such. Mailing lists have a way of mangling stuff like this. :-) Try this: http://pastebin.com/2hTBU8XF