similar to: Asterisk variable for SIP context

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Asterisk variable for SIP context"

2005 Jul 28
8
dialplan defenition
Hello list, Im writing my dial plan, in witch every SIP phone begins with 74 and has more 3 numbers (like 74XXX). So, I want to route all 74XXX calls to my sip channel. For this I wrote this line: exten => s,1,Dial(SIP/74118@193.136.252.5,30,r) but this way all calls go to 74118@193.136.252.5 ..... Then I tried: exten => s,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}@193.136.252.5,30,r) but this way, the
2009 Mar 06
1
Parked Calls in 1.4.23.1
I know the call parking feature changed in 1.4.23.1 to fix some serious issues. I'm seeing a major change though which I find disturbing. A person parks a call by transferring it to the parking position (700). When the timeout value is reached, the call is NOT returned to that device, but rather the 's' extension of the phone's registered context (in this case [unrestricted]).
2006 Dec 15
2
Trying to forward calls by using the Callee's context as the forward dial context
I'm simply trying to forward calls to users who have the call forwarding feature enabled (FWD Status and FWD Ph Number kept in the astDB). The problem is that I want users to be able to forward calls to numbers that they would normally be allowed to dial within their own context. (I don't want a local call only person forwarding to a long dist number, for example.) I'm able to
2011 Mar 30
1
VECM with UNRESTRICTED TREND
Dear All, My question is: how can I estimate VECM system with "unrestricted trend" (aka "case 5") option as a deterministic term? As far as I know, ca.jo in urca package allows for "restricted trend" only [vecm <- ca.jo(data, type = "trace"/"eigen", ecdet = "trend", K = n, spec = "transitory"/"longrun")].
2013 Jan 11
3
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
>> I suppose this tradeoff can be evaluated by looking at the delta >> between 4.5 and 4.6 which is actually supported by MSVC 2010 and Clang >> 3.1 > > Makes perfect sense to me. > > -Chris According to http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html, these features are available from 4.6 (language features only): - Null pointer constant - Forward declarations for enums -
2009 Oct 18
4
[OT] DHCP auth&auth software
Does anyone know about some free (as in beer, and maybe as in speech) software which would implement authentication and authorization of a user prior to issuing a valid dhcp lease? I imagine the following scenario: someone walks into my office building with a laptop (a colleague, a visitor, a guest, whoever), and hooks up onto the local net (wired or wireless). The server detects an unknown
2007 Jan 18
1
Passing video calls / bearer capability thru PRI
Hi all, using latest asterisk-svn I want to reflect an video call incoming via an PRI EuroISDN channel to another outgoing PRI channel, and I want the the outgoing channel to have the exact same bearer capability < Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer capability: Unrestricted digital information (8) < Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate:
2013 Sep 22
1
[PATCH] Nested VMX: Expose unrestricted guest feature to guest
From: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com> With virtual unrestricted guest feature, L2 guest is allowed to run with PG cleared. Also, allow PAE not set during virtual vmexit emulation. Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com> --- xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 3 ++- xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git
2005 Jan 27
1
Making digital/data calls through asterisk
Hi! We planing to by some PRI/BRI equipment to replace our existing telephone system. So I am going to try this: ISDN Card Outgoing Digital Call / Capability: Unrestricted digital information -> octobri -> asterisk -> TE410E -> Internet Provider / Receiver for Capability Unrestricted digital information The question is: Is asterisk possible of transmit this digital call to the
2013 Oct 16
2
How to obtain restricted estimates from coxph()?
Hello, I'm trying to use coxph() function to fit a very simple Cox proportional hazards regression model (only one covariate) but the parameter space is restricted to an open set (0, 1). Can I still obtain a valid estimate by using coxph function in this scenario? If yes, how? Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!!! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2009 Feb 10
1
loglik and arima()
All - I am evaluating an arima(2,1,3) and arima(3,1,3) and notice the log-likelihood of the restricted model is higher than the log-likelihood of the unrestricted. Since these are nested models, I thought the unrestricted model would have a log-likelihood at least as large as that of the restricted model. Am I interpreting the "loglik" output incorrectly? Regards, Stephen
2012 Sep 10
3
[PATCH] docs: document "ucode=" hypervisor command line option
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown +++ b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown @@ -785,6 +785,19 @@ Specify the per-cpu trace buffer size in > `= unstable | skewed` ### ucode +> `= <integer>` + +Specify the CPU microcode update blob module index. When positive, this +specifies the n-th module (in the GrUB entry, zero based)
2024 Apr 23
1
System GMM yields identical results for any weighting matrix
A copy of this question can be found on Cross Validated: https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/645362 I am estimating a system of seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR) in R. Each of the equations has one unique regressor and one common regressor. I am using `gmm::sysGmm` and am experimenting with different weighting matrices. I get the same results (point estimates, standard errors and
2013 Aug 27
2
Re: Oracle RAC in libvirt+KVM environment
>> I found that scsicmd can't pass all the scsi3_test but the result of >> sg_inq is the same as it in the host. >> >> I am absolutely confused about this situation. Am I missed some >> information about it? I guess this is caused by the lack of capability. Please check if enough capability was added to kvm process by the following steps. 1. Check the pid of
2010 Dec 06
1
waldtest and nested models - poolability (parameter stability)
Dear All, I'm trying to use waldtest to test poolability (parameter stability) between two logistic regressions. Because I need to use robust standard errors (using sandwich), I cannot use anova. anova has no problems running the test, but waldtest does, indipendently of specifying vcov or not. waldtest does not appear to see that my models are nested. H0 in my case is the the vector of
2024 Apr 23
1
System GMM yields identical results for any weighting matrix
Generally speaking, this sort of detailed statistical question about a speccial package in R does not get a reply on this general R programming help list. Instead, I suggest you either email the maintainer (found by ?maintainer) or ask a question on a relevant R task view, such as https://cran.r-project.org/web/views/Econometrics.html . (or any other that you judge to be more appropriate).
2012 May 04
9
[hybrid]: unable to boot hvm due to eflags.ID
Hi guys, At a loss trying to figure why if (has_eflag(X86_EFLAGS_ID)) returns false in my HVM domU. Standard function has_eflag() in cpucheck.c running in real mode. Works fine on PV dom0, but fails when guest is booting on my hybrid dom0. LMK if any ideas. I''ll keep digging in the manuals, but nothing so far. thanks, Mukesh
2018 Oct 26
2
ip6tables on C7
Working on a script, and to test, I need to shut down ip6tables temporarily. firewalld is running; is there any way to shut down *just* ip6tables? I tried installinf iptables-services, and did a systemctl stop ip6tables, and no joy. mark
2014 Dec 22
2
Contribute to the Wiki
Hello Akemi, I have gone through your mail and provided link and this is my contribution details - the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s) :- Provide technical support to CentOS user - the proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s) :- Pune (India) Thanks & Regards, Gajanan Kankal On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: >
2011 Sep 07
2
reporting ANOVA for nested models
I have the following results for an ANOVA comparing two nested models. I wasn't sure how I am supposed to report this result in the area of psychology. Specifically, am I supposed to report the DF's or just the F ratio? I could manually calculate the degrees of freedoms, but there must be a reason why R does not give this information, i.e. those are not conventionally used in the