similar to: Intermittent T.38 pass through

Hello, I've Googled and done some mailing list searches, but can't figure out the following . When a user on a Windows 2000 machine attempts to change their password, the change gets applied to /etc/passwd, but not to smbpasswd. The error I receive from Windows is: "The system cannot change your password right now because the domain .. Is not available". (The domain is

Hi All, I have 1.4.9.1 setup, with the compiler flags enabled for T38, and have a Mediatrix 2102 and a Linksys SPA 8000-G1. I can pass faxes between devices but can't seem to invoke T38 pt UDPTL. It's enabled in sip.conf [general] and well as the [peer]. I get an error at the CLI: WARNING[3096]: chan_sip.c:14149 handle_request_invite: RTP re-invite after T38 session not handled yet !

Asterisk 1.4.32 (Also 1.4.26, 1.4.33) Broadvox ITSP (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) Linksys 2102 (yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy) Both peers : canreinvite=yes t38pt_udptl = yes I'm having some trouble getting a T.38 fax call established with Broadvox. During negotiation, Asterisk sends a SIP re-invite (T38 switchover) to Broadvox with the Asterisk server's IP address in the Connection Information (c) instead of

Hello all, I recently bought a brand new Dell Precision 7540 laptop.? Before buying I checked the specifications from the RedHat hardware list and they said that it was "fully RedHat 8 Certified" and listed all the hardware that was "certified" to work with that laptop. https://access.redhat.com/ecosystem/hardware/3979771 I have had good results the last few years with

[big snip] > There is a sysfs attribute called "d3cold_allowed" which can be used > for "blocking" D3cold, so can you please retest using that? > Hey-this is almost certainly not the right place in this thread to respond, but this thread has gotten so deep evolution can't push the subject further to the right, heh. So I'll just respond here. I've been

On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 8:52 PM Marc MERLIN <marc_nouveau at merlins.org> wrote: > > Ok, I have an update to this problem. I added the nouveau list because > I can't quite tell if the issue is: > - the PCIe changes that went in 5.6 I think (or 5.5?), referenced below > > - a new issue with thunderbold on thinkpad P73, that seems to be > triggered if I have a USB-C

I am building a tool to identify the file that has a specific LBA. The approach I am using is to search through each inode from number 2 up. This approach works well with UFS1 file systems as then preinitialize all the inodes. However, UFS2 does lazy inode initialization so there are always some that are basically garbage. I have not found any relaiable way to determine from the

Dear all, Anyone get the lastest spandsp with udptl.c and tpkt.c compile in Fedora 3? tpkt.c: In function `accept_thread': tpkt.c:140: error: `TCP_NODELAY' undeclared (first use in this function) tpkt.c:140: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once tpkt.c:140: error: for each function it appears in.) tpkt.c:144: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:48:27AM -0100, fungus wrote: > One the one hand this is a great achievement but on the > other hand normal people aren't going to figure out how > good it is because they'll never push the limits. > Who's going to set "quality 0.5" when they've got a > range from zero up to ten. This is very true. I can easily hear MP3

Hello everyone, Stopped by Best Buy last night and picked up a Rio Karma. Since from-the-trenches reviews seem scarce, I thought I might post some thoughts. The short story: I'm probably returning it, will be buying a different portable player. The software doesn't work, and I don't think I wanna screw with it. The long story: It looks cool, is tiny,

Dear list, I've got the following setup : [FAX-ATA]--[PBX LAN]--[Firewall]--[PBX WAN]-----[upstream SIP] On the PBX's we run Asterisk 1.4.33 with t38pt_udptl=yes in [general]. The FAX ATA is a Teles VoIPBox with T.38 support (that works). On the PBX WAN, i see the following in udptl debug : Sent UDPTL packet to 172.16.0.156:4460 (type 0, seq 184, len 32) Got UDPTL packet from

Hi, I'm trying to download some pictures off my camera and I keep getting an error. This used to work at some point although I can't say when. The camera is a Cannon EOS and I plug it in to a USB port and turn it on and I get a dialog box with a title of "Cannon Digital Camera" saying "You have just inserted a medium with digital photos...blah blah...". When I

Hello, We're trying to receive faxes on the Asterisk server, but for the time being T.38 negotiation fails. The SDP that the Asterisk reINVITE sends contains these lines: ---------------------- m=image 4968 udptl t38 a=T38FaxVersion:0 a=T38MaxBitRate:9600 a=T38FaxFillBitRemoval a=T38FaxTranscodingMMR a=T38FaxTranscodingJBIG a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF a=T38FaxMaxDatagram:1400

Ok, I have an update to this problem. I added the nouveau list because I can't quite tell if the issue is: - the PCIe changes that went in 5.6 I think (or 5.5?), referenced below - a new issue with thunderbold on thinkpad P73, that seems to be triggered if I have a USB-C yubikey in the port. With 5.7, my issues went away if I removed the USB key during boot, showing an interaction

On 09/26/2015 10:08 PM, Meikel wrote: > Hi folks, > > for some time I used a HP 2840 AiO device, connected via LAN, to scan > documents. As scanning application I use xsane. I want to replace that > HP scanner by a CanoScan LiDE 210. > > # LANG="" yum info libsane-hpaio > ... > Installed Packages > Name : libsane-hpaio > Arch : x86_64 >

Calling from my home using Asterisk 1.6.2.1 to an office extension (Asterisk 1.6.1.13) the callerid is not honored: Home: -- Starting simple switch on 'DAHDI/1-1' -- Executing [170 at internal:1] Answer("DAHDI/1-1", "") in new stack -- Executing [170 at internal:2] NoOp("DAHDI/1-1", "Context: office-extensions") in new stack

I'm struggling to get my dialplan to work with a simple analog fax machine. I have TDM400B zaptel card with an FXO and FXS port. I have the FXO port connected to the POTS machine and the FAX machine connected to the FXS port. The FAX machine itself works fine, I can FAX outgoing messages fine. I can also dial the FAX extension from the internal context, the FAX machine answers and I

Gentlemen, I have 3 faxes attached to an Asterisk. Fax - SPA2102 - Asterisk. 0851711201 and 0851711290 is on our WAN, no NAT. 0197673581 is outside our WAN and needs to be NAT'ed. Sending a fax from 0851711201 to 0851711290, no problem, switches to T38 and fax goes through. Sending a from 0197673581 to 0851711201, no problem as long as i dont enable T38 on 0197673581. But, if i enable T38

Hi! I have exactly the same problem on asterisk 1.8.22.0 and also on separate 11.2.1 when sending fax to PSTN. Tryed with spa-3102, spa-2102, Patton Smartnode 4634, and Zoiper softphone. SpanDsp also works without any problem on my box. As I remember it was a bug in 1.8.1.x that the a=T38MaxBitRate paramater was sent as "maxBitRate". Without capital "M". Are you closer to

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Michael Maier wrote: <snip> > > t38modem and asterisk are using > > m=image 35622 udptl t38 > ^^^^^ > > Provider uses > > m=image 35622 UDPTL t38 > ^^^^^ > > Could this be a problem? If I'm sending internal only, it's always > lowercase. Looking at the tests we have we