Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Asterisk 1.4 reliability problems"
2008 Apr 03
6
ztdummy
What does it take to get ztdummy to work correctly?
I have a new laptop HP HDX9200. I am running asterisk 1.4.19 and zaptel
1.4.9.2
Zaptel compiles fine. asterisk compiles fine. ztdummy loads asterisk runs.
Problem is playback() does not work. So then I stop zaptel, asterisk
runs and playback() now
works. However, meetme()'s dont work. I need ztdummy I'm pretty sure for
that.
I am
2008 Oct 12
5
One Way Audio Problem
Hello all,
I've been lobbying for some time at the #asterisk IRC channel. Until
now, I still can't find a solution to my one way audio problem. I
rebuilt the Asterisk-1.4.21.2 from the Debian Testing repository on my
Debian Etch. I got a Digium TDM400P with 1 FXO (channel 4) and 1 FXS
(channel 1). My SIP extension phone located inside the LAN is a SNOM
300 IP phone.
This one way audio
2008 Mar 19
6
Hardphone SIP phone costs
I'm trying to understand something that just doesn't seem to compute.
How can companies like Cisco justify selling their hard phones for as
much as they do? I know there is a matter of recouping R&D costs but
when you look at the iPhone with all its amazing features for less than
$500.00 it just doesn't make sense. Am I the only one that thinks this?
Roy Anciso
Director of
2008 Mar 19
2
Is Asterisk ready for Prime-Time?
On Mar 19, 2008, at 1:00 PM, asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com
wrote:
> Am I expecting too much?
Perhaps.
I think the hardware on which we run Asterisk can be much more
reliable than the software, which is often the case. We have a bunch
of HP servers with RAID and have never lost anything. A HD may fail,
but the RAID keeps it going until we pop a new drive in there. A
2003 Feb 19
5
codecs
Hello,
can i use different audio codecs when i calling between sip devices (
snom phones ) and different when i making call from isdn to sip or from
sip to isdn ?
best regards
Marian
--
SUNTEQ s. r. o.
Bojnicka cesta 35 # Prievidza # 971 04 # Slovak republic
Tel: +421-46-5430 754 # Fax: +421-46-5439 144
http://www.sunteq.sk/
------------------------------------------------------------
A
2005 Mar 04
4
Difference between Snom 190 & Elmeg 290?
Hi list!
While looking for the Snom 190 I found another phone, the Elmeg IP 290
(www.elmeg.de).
Looking at the pictures & the specs they seem to be very similar beasts
but the firmware is supposedly not interchangeable.
Does anyone know the difference between the 2, do they work with Asterisk?
The weird thing is that Elmeg has similar phones with the Snom look but
they are ISDN only (no
2006 Oct 26
10
ECHO Cancellation in SIP Calls
Hi,
i am from Germany, so excuse my School English.
I use Asteriks 1.2.12.1, zaptel 1.2.9 and mISDN Rc25 - since my update
of Asterisk 2 wooks ago, Echos accure in my SIP Calls.
I use SNOM 360, sometimes there is no echo (for example if i call myself
via SIP->Asterisk->SIPProvider->TELEKOM->ISDN)
but if i call other people there occures Echo many times. The Routing is
always the
2007 Jul 18
3
Redundancy / Failover
I've been evaluating Asterisk for a while, and things seem to be
going very well. The issue of redundancy and automatic fail-over is
now on my mind. I searched the archives and googled for solutions,
but didn't really come up with much.
We'll be using queues (modified), which precludes some of the
standard redundancy solutions, since the queue needs to know all the
agents
2004 Sep 22
7
Some photos from Astricon 2004
These taken tonight (9/22/2004) at the Expo and Reception
Enjoy. http://photos.tropiano.org/gallery/astricon-2004
Lenny
2004 May 17
2
Problems w. chan_capi + ztdummy
Hi Everybody
I've got a weird problem. I am running one Asterisk system on a dual
processor box. This box mostly do VoIP only but it has a Fritz PCI ISDN
card installed with latest drivers. Dialing out through the ISDN cards from
an internal Snom phone works fine and so does dialing in. Except - if I
load the ztdummy module (for IAX channels) the capi drivers starts acting
up. It is hard
2004 May 19
1
using iLBC
I want use iLBC and have following in mind, please help me is it possible ?
ISDN <-----(ALAW)-----> * <-----(ALAW)-----> SNOM
SIP??<-----(iLBC)----->?*?<-----(ALAW)----->?SNOM
1. ISDN incoming codec is ALAW SNOM codec should be ALAW (can't be iLBC
because a lack of codec).
2. SIP incoming codec should be iLBC (snom is ALAW).
3. SIP outgoing codec should be iLBC /snom
2006 Jun 22
1
Routing inboud from ISDN to second * server.
Hi All,
I have setup 2 asterisk servers using AAH 2.8. I have configured a IAX2
trunk between the 2 servers using the guide on dumbme. Trunk is not using
register string and no authentication.
In my dial plan I have 7XX numers on server B and 6xx numbers on Server A.
Calls from my SNOM phones are ok between the extensions on the 2 servers.
In server A I have a eicon 4 port BRI card connected.
2009 Jan 08
2
Could you compile mISDN 1.1.8 on Lenny ?
Hi,
Before diving into this, I would very pleased to know if someone could yes
or no, successfully compile mISDN 1.1.8 on Lenny (latest RC1 or beta2
version) ?
Regards
After a fresh install on Lenny, I can reproduce at will :
apt-get install build-essential linux-headers-2.6.26-1-686
cd /usr/src
wget http://www.misdn.org/downloads/mISDN.tar.gz
tar xvf mISDN.tar.gz
cd mISDN-1_1_8
make
....
2006 Nov 20
7
Snom 360 Multiple calls on hold help
Hi everyone,
Ive just installed a bunch of Snom 360s, and now having a NIGHTMARE of
problems! Ive got a receponist phone with a extra sidecar on it. And when
she gets 2+ calls and puts them on hold, when she goes to transfer them out
the calls on hold get merged together. Somehow the calls on hold get merged
and not to the extension needed!! Any help on this would be great guys, that
would be
2005 Aug 05
4
Snom 360 and firmware 4.0 problem
I have a pair of snom 360s at a customer and they were giving me Low Memory
errors. The distributor suggested updating the firmware. I did that, to the
one just below 4.0 (which wasn't released yet). One of the phones is still
giving the Low Memory error every 3-4 days. The other one had a broken
display that was just RMA'd, so it' hasn't been up long enough to know if the
2005 Jun 13
2
SNOM, Asterisk and Attended transfer (bug?)
Hi,
I am using a number of snom190 phones, and an asterisk "gateway"
server, and recently started experimenting with call transfers. The
snom phones provide support for attended and un-attended call
transfer, so I would rather use that than call-parking.
I have found that un-attended transfer works fine, and that attended
transfer works fine if the originating phone call is NON-SIP
2003 Dec 30
3
A Head Check
Hello,
I have been retained by a Building Management Company to install a
combined Voice/Data solution for a Tennated Office Space. This space will
rent offices, with telephone and internet service to inviduals or small
groups of individuals. As fate would have it, the service will be
provided in a building where we have a major Pop, with a DS-3 worth of
ISDN PRI circuits, 345 megs of
2005 Jun 25
2
* fax reliability between ISDN PRI and FXS ports
Hi,
I am building for a customer an * solution that will use 2 Digium cards.
1 x TE110P (T1 ISDN PRI)
1 x TDM40B (4 analog ports, 2 for faxes, 2 for extensions)
The system will be connected to the PSTN through the T1 ISDN PRI interface.
All customer extensions will be SIP phones except 2 fax machines that will
use the analog FXS ports on the TDM40B card.
I have been investigating on this
2004 May 20
8
I have put iLBC at the top
I want use iLBC and have following in mind, please help me is it possible ?
ISDN <-----(ALAW)-----> * <-----(ALAW)-----> SNOM
SIP??<-----(iLBC)----->?*?<-----(ALAW)----->?SNOM
1. ISDN incoming codec is ALAW SNOM codec should be ALAW (can't be iLBC
because a lack of codec).
2. SIP incoming codec should be iLBC (snom is ALAW).
3. SIP outgoing codec should be iLBC /snom
2003 Aug 21
2
Re: Some questions about Asterisk and reliability
Gabe Bourque wrote:
> Hello Anton Tinchev,
>
> I'm writing to you in hopes you can answer a few questions regarding
> Asterisk/Digium and it's reliability. I saw your posting in the
> Asterisk mailing list (Re: [Asterisk-Users] Is Asterisk ready for "real"
> use?) and decided to write directly to you. The reason being that you
> are one of only a few