similar to: Telemarketer Torture....

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Telemarketer Torture...."

2007 May 05
3
asterisk telemarketer torture sound files
Hi, I have some annoying telemarketer calling me on a recurring basis, but I'd like to discourage them a bit and have some fun. I found this: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+AEL+Telemarketer+Torture but the link to download the sound files is dead (wyoming.e-tools.com is NXDOMAIN). Anyone have a copy of these? -Adam
2003 Dec 09
2
Telemarketer Torture
Hello-- I submitted of extensions.conf that contains my "telemarketer torture" menus, last week sometime to the mailing list. I got back a note from the mailing list machinery, stating that it was too big, and would be subject to approval. No such approval came, I guess. Either I missed it, or it didn't rate, or the moderator just plain hasn't gotten around to it yet. So, I
2008 Mar 16
0
Telemarketer Torture.... (was: Re: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 44, Issue 49)
You could accept as the "passcode" the caller punching in their own phone#, then checking that against your whitelist. Lets associates get past the challenge when using someone else's phone, without their remembering some arbitrary passcode. And strangers or barred old associates who abuse it can get an earful about how you're suing them for wire fraud. Preferably after you
2003 Jun 12
2
Telemarketer GSM?
does anyone have a recorder GSM file that emulates the Telco's "if you are a telemarketer please hangup now" recording? I don't see one in the sounds dir. the ZapATEller works great for computerized callers but if a human hears this message asking them to go away they have to. Isn't that right? Dave
2004 Aug 23
4
Telemarketer screening
I have been bugging by a telemarketer who does not take any cue at all. So I look up the Asterisk Handbook and send his call with the respect caller id to my voicemail. Has any one implemented any of this feature with database for more caller ids to be included?? David Kwok
2004 Sep 15
2
Results of 13 month study on reducing telemarketing calls
Hello-- I've been playing with the privacy options on my home/home-office system since August last year, and have some results, gleaned from my CDR records, which over the last 13 months, number a total of 8672, which includes incoming, as well as outgoing calls. Before I start spitting out numbers, let me note that with the current setup, I haven't had to tell a single telemarketer
2007 Dec 13
2
How do I do this?
I have 2 asterisk servers - serverA and serverC - connected via IAX2. On serverA, I have a "telemarketer hold" extension which, if I transfer a caller into it, loops around playing music & "please wait" messages, until they give up & hang up the phone. Also on serverA, I have a custom devstate, which lights a lamp on a phone connected to serverA, which tells me if
2005 Jan 09
5
telemarketing application
Hi, I have the following requirements I'd like to implement with asterisk: 1. Asterisk notifies interested PC's on the network that there's an incoming call so that the telemarketing app can bring up the customer automagically 2. If a telemarketer makes a call and the customer isn't there and they arrange a callback, the callback is diverted to the originating telemarketers phone
2007 May 09
6
List of telemarketers??
Does anyone know if there is a known list of telemarketers? Something like http://whocalled.us/ with an easier access? We could all benefit if there was such a thing :-) If there is enough interest, I could put up a database that everyone can benefit from. I just need some suggestions on: (1) Adding new numbers based on community responses (some rule to sanity check) (2) Method that everyone
2008 Jun 13
1
PRI crashing Asterisk
I have a user who's system crashes on pri hangup request. Tried 1.4.19.1 and 1.4.20 as well as the latest libpri no change Progress is as follows...... < Supervisory frame: < SAPI: 00 C/R: 0 EA: 0 < TEI: 000 EA: 1 < Zero: 0 S: 0 01: 1 [ RR (receive ready) ] < N(R): 025 P/F: 1 < 0 bytes of data -- ACKing all packets from 24 to (but not including) 25 -- Since
2008 Feb 20
2
Skype Users
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 found this today, I am not a skype user but have read on chan_skype and don't like aspects of how it is implemented. My thoughts on it are only theoretical as I haven't used it I just cringe at adding X to a server. Anyhow there is a new project called sippyskype that appears to do a similar sort of thing with a couple differences. 1. Its
2007 May 10
1
Redirecting an existing channel?
Hi all, There's been a few posts looking for telemarketer torture scripts so I figured that I would write one using a SQLite db. Handling an incoming call that is flagged from the database is pretty simple. My problem is that I would like the callee on an established channel to be able to redirect the caller to a specific context where my AGI is called and handles the call by first
2006 Nov 15
7
Do Not Call List
The US has a Do Not Call list to which people can subscribe to prevent being called by advertisers. Federal laws (strengthened by some state and more local laws) assign penalties for calling people/phones on the DNCL. Is there a query gateway that Asterisk (or an app using Asterisk) can filter through to ensure a number is OK to call (not on the list) before calling it? -- (C) Matthew Rubenstein
1999 Jul 18
0
2.0.5-pre3: torture.c doesn't compile on rh60
rh60/2.2.10-ac10 Compiling utils/torture.c utils/torture.c: In function `run_browsetest': utils/torture.c:929: invalid type argument of `->' utils/torture.c:934: invalid type argument of `->' utils/torture.c: In function `create_procs': utils/torture.c:1118: warning: initialization discards `volatile' from pointer target type utils/torture.c:1118: warning: passing arg 1
2004 May 24
1
Build Errors, torture tests 3.0.x/HP-UX 11i
I get the following errors when building the torture suite under HP-UX 11i with HP AnsiC. They are actually somewhat similar to the errors that I get trying to build the whole package with gcc: Compiling torture/torture.c In file included from include/includes.h:109, from torture/torture.c:23: /usr/include/sys/socket.h:484: error: parse error before "sendfile"
2005 Jan 28
2
Direct MP3 channel Black Hole?
I'm curious is it possible to direct a call to an extension that takes you straight to music on hold, but NOT the standard music on hold. The boss suggested something he wondered if it was possible. Example: Someone calls (Telemarketer), we answer tell them to hold while we 'redirect' them to extension (Someone Important) 666 which is a separate music on hold pool of mp3's from
2009 Jun 12
0
[LLVMdev] ARM backend failures from (gcc) c torture suite
I don't have a target in front of me to run these tests at the moment, but walking manually through va-arg-1.c, it's pretty clear that there's some disconnect between the register spilling that happens in LowerFORMAL_ARGUMENTS and what happens in LowerVASTART in ARMISelLowering.cpp. deep On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:45 AM, robert muth<robert at muth.org> wrote: > I wrote a few
2009 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] ARM backend failures from (gcc) c torture suite
I wrote a few scripts to run llvm/arm against the gnu c torture test suite which consists of over 900 smallish tests. There were quite a few failures with llvm/arm which I hereby want to report (see attached tarball for the actual failing testsc). Most of the failures are related to vararg/stdarg. I think I saw a bug files for this but cannot find it anymore. Is somebody on this? Finally, I
2009 Jul 24
0
[LLVMdev] ARM backend failures from (gcc) c torture suite
Can you file a bug? Thanks. Evan On Jul 22, 2009, at 8:30 AM, robert muth wrote: > I have run the torture test again svn head rev 76522 (2009/07/20) > there are now > 2 compilation and 23 runtime failure. A tarball with reproducers is > attached. > Most problems are still vargs related. > > Robert > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Sandeep Patel
2003 Mar 04
1
Torture tests
Hi, all. I've been so impressed with Dovecot, I'm in the process of moving my mail over to it. In fact, one of my mailboxes got SO huge, it'll likely literally take more than a day to move it all over (in excess of 19,000 mails, about 140 megabytes). So far, the IMAP server shows absolutely no sign of crapping out yet. It should also be noted that I'm moving all this mail